EMIT: EXPLICIT MODELING OF INTERACTIVE-ENGAGEMENT TECHNIQUES: for Physics Graduate Teaching Assistants and the Impact on Instruction and Student Performance in Calculus-Based Physics

EMIT: Explicit Modeling of Interactive-Engagement Techniques for Physics Graduate Teaching Assistants and the Impact on Instruction and Student Performance in Calculus-based Physics. (December 2004) Cathy Mariotti Ezrailson, B.S., Ashland University; M.S., University of Houston Co-Chairs of Advisory Committee: Dr. Cathleen C. Loving Dr. G. Donald Allen This study measures the effect of a model of explicit instruction (EMIT) on the: 1) physics graduate teaching assistants’ adherence to reformed teaching methods, 2) impact of the instructional model on GTAs’ beliefs about the nature of physics and physics problem solving and 3) undergraduate physics students’ understanding and performance in an introductory calculus-based physics course. Methods included explicit modeling for the treatment group GTAs of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and assessment of treatment and control GTAs and their students throughout the semester. Students’ understanding was measured using the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and Flash-mediated Force and Motion Concept Inventory (FMCA). Students were surveyed about performance of GTAs using the Student Survey (SS). Results indicated changes were tied to individual GTAs’ beliefs about the nature of physics. Student conceptual understanding reflected a two-fold Hake gain compared to the control group. General application of the EMIT model presupposes explicit instruction of the model for GTAs.

[1]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery , 1999, Springer US.

[2]  David Hammer,et al.  Students' beliefs about conceptual knowledge in introductory physics , 1994 .

[3]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[4]  K. McGilly,et al.  Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. , 1994 .

[5]  Cathleen C. Loving.  The Scientific Theory Profile: A Philosophy of Science Model for Science Teachers. , 1991 .

[6]  James O. Carey,et al.  The systematic design of instruction , 1978 .

[7]  C. Palau,et al.  ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION , 2015 .

[8]  Pamela A. Kraus,et al.  THE TEACHING AND LEARNING OF PHYSICS , 2001 .

[9]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change , 1999 .

[10]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Developing Models in Science Education , 2000 .

[11]  Richard Gunstone,et al.  Teachers' attitudes about physics classroom practice , 1998 .

[12]  Philip Scott,et al.  The Force Concept Inventory: A Tool for Monitoring Student Learning. , 2002 .

[13]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Using Models to Represent Reality , 1999 .

[14]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Case study of the physics component of an integrated curriculum , 1999 .

[15]  P. J. Brancazio.  The nature of physics , 1975 .

[16]  D J Evans,et al.  Parallel processing , 1986 .

[17]  Ronald N. Giere,et al.  Understanding Scientific Reasoning , 1979 .

[18]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[19]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[20]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[21]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning Project. , 1993 .

[22]  S. Ian Robertson,et al.  Problem-solving , 2001, Human Thinking.

[23]  Andrea A. Disessa,et al.  Students' construction of qualitative physics knowledge: learning about velocity and acceleration in a computer microworld , 1991 .

[24]  Juan R. Burciaga.  A Love of Discovery: Science Education—The Second Career of Robert Karplus , 2007 .

[25]  E. L. Jossem.  Resource Letter EPGA-1: The Education of Physics Graduate Assistants. , 2000 .

[26]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1998: Building a Science of Teaching Physics , 1999 .

[27]  M. McCloskey.  Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[28]  J. Dewey.  Logic, the theory of inquiry , 1938 .

[29]  Sheila Tobias.  Rethinking Science As a Career , 1995 .

[30]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[31]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[32]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching , 1990 .

[33]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups , 1992 .

[34]  H. W. Smith,et al.  Strategies of social research , 1975 .

[35]  J. Epstein,et al.  School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring for the Children We Share , 2010 .

[36]  J. Green,et al.  Affect In Language Learning , 2002 .

[37]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[38]  Ronald K. Thornton.  Conceptual dynamics: Following changing student views of force and motion , 2008 .

[39]  J. Roschelle.  Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[40]  C. Geertz.  Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture , 1973 .

[41]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[42]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Making Sense of How Students Make Sense of Mechanical Waves , 1999, physics/0207092.

[43]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[44]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Concepts, Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions: Changing Perspectives in Science Education , 1983 .

[45]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[46]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[47]  David E. Brown,et al.  Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: factors influencing understanding in a teaching experiment , 1989 .

[48]  Andrée Tiberghien,et al.  Connecting Research in Physics Education with Teacher Education , 2001 .

[49]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[50]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Knowledge in pieces : An evolving framework for understanding knowing and learning , 1988 .

[51]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[52]  D. Westgate,et al.  Investigating classroom talk , 1987 .