Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes of Primary Pulmonary Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Simple Summary Pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is a recognized variant of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) that has unique histological patterns. Comprehensively clinical studies and pathological analyses on IMAs have been limited because IMA is rarely diagnosed compared with other subtypes. We compared the clinical characteristics, pathological features, and survival outcomes of 77 IMA patients with 520 non-IMA-type ADC patients. Currently, IMAs lack a simple pathological prognostic grading system to predict survival. We therefore proposed a simple two-tier grading system, which was modified from the low- and high-grade PanIN grading system, to evaluate its prognostic value. We found that IMAs have more distinct clinicopathological characteristics compared to non-IMA-type ADCs. For patients with stage I–IIIA IMA, a new two-tier grading system might be useful in predicting recurrence-free survival. We demonstrated that stage I and II IMAs have better overall survival compared with non-IMA-type ADCs. Abstract Pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) has unique histological patterns. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and survival outcomes of IMAs. We retrospectively identified 77 patients with pulmonary IMA and reviewed their clinical and pathological features. Another 520 patients with non-IMA-type ADC were retrieved for comparison with patients with IMA. A new two-tier grading system (high-grade and low-grade IMAs) modified from the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia classification system was used for survival analyses. Compared to patients with non-IMA-type ADC, patients with IMA tended to have never smoked (p = 0.01) and had early-stage IMA at initial diagnosis (p < 0.001). For stage I–II diseases, the five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 76% in IMAs and 50% in non-IMA-type ADCs, and a longer OS was observed in patients with IMA (p = 0.002). KRAS mutations were the most commonly detected driver mutations, which occurred in 12 of the 28 (43%) patients. High-grade IMAs were associated with a shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) for stage I–IIIA diseases (p = 0.010) than low-grade IMAs but not for OS. In conclusion, patients with stage I and II IMA had better OS than those with non-IMA-type ADC. A new two-tier grading system might be useful for predicting RFS in stage I–IIIA IMAs.

[1]  R. Govindan,et al.  Sotorasib for Lung Cancers with KRAS p.G12C Mutation. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  A. Addeo,et al.  KRAS G12C Mutations in NSCLC: From Target to Resistance , 2021, Cancers.

[3]  Ho Yun Lee,et al.  Spread through air spaces (STAS) in invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung: Incidence, prognostic impact, and prediction based on clinicoradiologic factors , 2020, Thoracic cancer.

[4]  A. Drilon,et al.  NRG1 fusion-driven tumors: biology, detection and the therapeutic role of afatinib and other ErbB-targeting agents. , 2020, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  A. Nicholson,et al.  A Grading System for Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: A Proposal From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee , 2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

[6]  K. Tsuta,et al.  Prognostic impact of mucin spread, tumor cell spread, and invasive size in invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung. , 2020, Lung cancer.

[7]  Xueqin Chen,et al.  Clinical management of lung adenocarcinoma patients with HER2 V659E mutation. , 2020 .

[8]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Prognostic Impact of Histopathologic Features in Pulmonary Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinomas. , 2020, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  M. Tsuboi,et al.  Optimal method for measuring invasive size that predicts survival in invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung , 2020, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Zhan,et al.  Analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics, genetic phenotypes, and prognostic of pure mucinous adenocarcinoma , 2019, Cancer medicine.

[11]  M. Tsuboi,et al.  Proportion of goblet cell is associated with malignant potential in invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung , 2019, Pathology international.

[12]  W. Nie,et al.  Comparing clinicopathological features and prognosis of primary pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma based on computed tomography findings , 2019, Cancer Imaging.

[13]  J. Shih,et al.  Validation of Immunohistochemistry for the Detection of BRAF V600E-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinomas , 2019, Cancers.

[14]  S. Choi,et al.  Effect of invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma on lung cancer-specific survival after surgical resection: a population-based study. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[15]  Anjia Han,et al.  Acinar-Predominant Pattern Correlates With Poorer Prognosis in Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Lung , 2018, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  Vamsidhar Velcheti,et al.  HER2 Transmembrane Domain (TMD) Mutations (V659/G660) That Stabilize Homo‐ and Heterodimerization Are Rare Oncogenic Drivers in Lung Adenocarcinoma That Respond to Afatinib , 2017, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[17]  H. Lee,et al.  Clinical course of stage IV invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung. , 2016, Lung cancer.

[18]  M. Antoine,et al.  NRG1 fusion in a French cohort of invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinoma , 2016, Cancer medicine.

[19]  H. You,et al.  Oncogenic function and clinical implications of SLC3A2-NRG1 fusion in invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung , 2016, Oncotarget.

[20]  J. Choi,et al.  Prognosis in Resected Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinomas of the Lung: Related Factors and Comparison with Resected Nonmucinous Adenocarcinomas , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[21]  Soohyun Hwang,et al.  ALK-rearranged adenocarcinoma with extensive mucin production can mimic mucinous adenocarcinoma: clinicopathological analysis and comprehensive histological comparison with KRAS-mutated mucinous adenocarcinoma. , 2016, Pathology.

[22]  G. Scagliotti,et al.  Retrospective Multicenter Study Investigating the Role of Targeted Next‐Generation Sequencing of Selected Cancer Genes in Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Lung , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[23]  L. Macconaill,et al.  KRAS and NKX2‐1 Mutations in Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Lung , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[24]  P. Wei,et al.  Detection of lung adenocarcinoma with ROS1 rearrangement by IHC, FISH, and RT-PCR and analysis of its clinicopathologic features , 2015, OncoTargets and therapy.

[25]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Introduction to The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus, and Heart. , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[26]  Maristela L Onozato,et al.  Unique Genetic and Survival Characteristics of Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Lung , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[27]  P. Kim,et al.  VAMP2–NRG1 Fusion Gene is a Novel Oncogenic Driver of Non–Small-Cell Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[28]  Prasad S Adusumilli,et al.  Associations Between Mutations and Histologic Patterns of Mucin in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Invasive Mucinous Pattern and Extracellular Mucin Are Associated With KRAS Mutation , 2014, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[29]  Yih-Leong Chang,et al.  Multidriver mutation analysis in pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma in Taiwan: identification of a rare CD74-NRG1 translocation case , 2014, Medical Oncology.

[30]  Y. Shim,et al.  Reliability of small biopsy or cytology for the diagnosis of pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma , 2014, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[31]  Koji Tsuta,et al.  Druggable Oncogene Fusions in Invasive Mucinous Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[32]  I. Petersen,et al.  CD74-NRG1 fusions in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[33]  A. Yoshizawa,et al.  Validation of the IASLC/ATS/ERS Lung Adenocarcinoma Classification for Prognosis and Association with EGFR and KRAS Gene Mutations: Analysis of 440 Japanese Patients , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[34]  Charles A Powell,et al.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma: executive summary. , 2011, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[35]  T. Nishimura,et al.  Frequency of EGFR and KRAS Mutations in Japanese Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma with Features of the Mucinous Subtype of Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[36]  G. Rossi,et al.  A Single Institution-Based Retrospective Study of Surgically Treated Bronchioloalveolar Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: Clinicopathologic Analysis, Molecular Features, and Possible Pitfalls in Routine Practice , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[37]  R. Govindan,et al.  Trends in Stage Distribution for Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A National Cancer Database Survey , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[38]  R H Hruban,et al.  Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A New Nomenclature and Classification System for Pancreatic Duct Lesions , 2001, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[39]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[40]  Jesse S. Voss,et al.  Pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma and mixed invasive mucinous/nonmucinous adenocarcinoma-a clinicopathological and molecular genetic study with survival analysis. , 2018, Human pathology.

[41]  A. Tsao,et al.  ROS1 Rearrangements Define a Unique Molecular Class of Lung Cancers , 2012 .