Optimization of automotive diesel engine calibration using genetic algorithm techniques

Abstract Although the advancements in automotive diesel engines in the last two decades have resulted in the possibility of achieving better performance with lower pollutant emissions and fuel consumption, the increased complexity of the system and the high number of control parameters require the solution of optimization problems of high dimensionality. It is of crucial importance to identify suitable methodologies, which allow achieving the full exploitation of the potential of these powertrains. In this paper, an original methodology for optimizing the latest generation of common rail automotive diesel engines has been presented. Random optimization methods along with surrogate models were firstly used to generate a population of engine calibrations, which then served as an initial population to a specifically conceived Genetic Algorithm (GA) based optimizer, which was finally applied on a real data set for a particular engine operating point. The results were compared with a calibration optimized using a traditional local approach method. A simultaneous reduction of about 20% in NOX and 1% in Brake Specific Fuel Consumption was achieved, with no significant increase in other emissions. The methodology described in the paper has the potential to reduce the calibration time and effort by half, while obtaining better calibrations.

[1]  Wolfgang Salber,et al.  Accelerated Powertrain Development Through Model Based Calibration , 2006 .

[2]  Walter Knecht,et al.  Diesel engine development in view of reduced emission standards , 2008 .

[3]  Ilya V. Kolmanovsky,et al.  Control of variable geometry turbocharged diesel engines for reduced emissions , 2000, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[4]  S. K. Chen,et al.  Simultaneous Reduction of NOx and Particulate Emissions by Using Multiple Injections in a Small Diesel Engine , 2000 .

[5]  Bekir Cirak,et al.  An Application of Artificial Neural Network for Predicting Engine Torque in a Biodiesel Engine , 2014 .

[6]  A. J. Martyr,et al.  19 – The pursuit and definition of accuracy: statistical analysis of test results , 2007 .

[7]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[8]  Roger Fletcher,et al.  A Rapidly Convergent Descent Method for Minimization , 1963, Comput. J..

[9]  F. Chaudoye,et al.  Comparison of Engine Calibration Methods Based on Design of Experiments (DoE) , 2008 .

[10]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[11]  Federico Millo,et al.  Experimental investigation on the effect of multiple injection strategies on emissions, noise and brake specific fuel consumption of an automotive direct injection common-rail diesel engine , 2003 .

[12]  Benoist Thirouard,et al.  Using Multiple Injection Strategies in Diesel Combustion: Potential to Improve Emissions, Noise and Fuel Economy Trade-Off in Low CR Engines , 2008 .

[13]  Quang Huy Tran,et al.  Optimization for engine calibration , 2008 .

[14]  Christopher M. Atkinson,et al.  Using Model-Based Rapid Transient Calibration to Reduce Fuel Consumption and Emissions in Diesel Engines , 2008 .

[15]  Evangelos G. Giakoumis,et al.  Light-Duty Vehicles , 2017 .

[16]  Boris Lohmann,et al.  Analysing Gaussian Processes for Stationary Black-Box Combustion Engine Modelling , 2011 .

[17]  Carlo Beatrice,et al.  Injection parameter optimization by DoE of a light-duty diesel engine fed by Bio-ethanol/RME/diesel blend , 2014 .

[18]  Christopher M. Atkinson,et al.  Dynamic Model-Based Calibration Optimization: An Introduction and Application to Diesel Engines , 2005 .

[19]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .