Concerning the Epistemology of Design: The Role of the Eco-Cognitive Model of Abduction in Pragmatism

Design has usually been linked to art and applied in scenarios related to everyday life. Even when design has, on occasion, made its way into the world of academia, it has always been closely linked to art and scenarios related everyday life. At last, however, the idea of design has reached the field of epistemology: an area within the very heart of philosophy that has always focused, in theory, on the foundations of knowledge. Consequently, design is being studied from different approaches interested in the foundation of knowledge, theoretical and practical. This is one of the reasons why abduction and pragmatism have been considered relevant from a design perspective. This paper first shows the main features of abduction and pragmatism, describes their evolution and considers their mutual implications. Second, the epistemology of design is analysed considering its most relevant characteristics. Third, the connection between abduction and, on the one hand, pragmatism and, on the other, design epistemology is addressed. Finally, the role of abductive inference in grounding a real epistemology for design theory from the naturalised cognitive perspective of abduction is outlined. The central proposition is that this approach is essential as a methodological innovation, as it allows us to analyse both the inquiry process and the design process as interdependent when dealing with practical problems of a social and cultural nature. This approach allows us to analyse how human actions determine changes in the theoretical framework from which we make our inquiry. In short, the world is an open-ended project that humans design through our daily inquiry.

[1]  A. Adúriz-Bravo,et al.  Abduction as a Mode of Inference in Science Education , 2022, Science & Education.

[2]  Embodied, Extended, Ignorant Minds , 2022, Synthese Library.

[3]  Handbook of Abductive Cognition , 2022 .

[4]  Alger Sans Pinillos Neglected Pragmatism: Discussing Abduction to Dissolute Classical Dichotomies , 2021 .

[5]  L. Magnani,et al.  Language: The “Ultimate Artifact” to Build, Develop, and Update Worldviews , 2021, Topoi.

[6]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  Computational domestication of ignorant entities , 2020, Synthese.

[7]  Philosophical and Methodological Debates in Public Health , 2019 .

[8]  Alger Sans Pinillos El lado epistemológico de las abducciones: La creatividad en las verdades-proyectadas , 2017 .

[9]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  The Abductive Structure of Scientific Creativity - An Essay on the Ecology of Cognition , 2017, Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics.

[10]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Dimensions of Creative Evaluation: Distinct Design and Reasoning Strategies for Aesthetic, Functional and Originality Judgments , 2016 .

[11]  Donna E. West,et al.  Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit , 2016 .

[12]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  The eco-cognitive model of abduction: Ἀπαγωγή now: Naturalizing the logic of abduction , 2015, J. Appl. Log..

[13]  Woosuk Park,et al.  On classifying abduction , 2015, J. Appl. Log..

[14]  Peter Dalsgaard,et al.  Pragmatism and Design Thinking , 2014 .

[15]  I. Said,et al.  The Roles of Cultural Spaces in Malaysia's Historic Towns: The Case of Kuala Dungun and Taiping☆ , 2013 .

[16]  Anna,et al.  The Stabilizing Role of Material Structure in Scientific Practice , 2012 .

[17]  Dino Karabeg,et al.  Design Epistemology , 2012, Inf..

[18]  Kees Dorst,et al.  The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application , 2011 .

[19]  T. Higgins,et al.  Ask the posts of our house: using cultural spaces to encourage quality learning in higher education , 2011 .

[20]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  Chances, affordances, and cognitive niche construction: the plasticity of environmental situatedness , 2010, Int. J. Adv. Intell. Paradigms.

[21]  C. Misak The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy , 2010 .

[22]  Jon Kolko,et al.  Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis , 2010, Design Issues.

[23]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  Abductive Cognition - The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning , 2009, Cognitive Systems Monographs.

[24]  Michelle Murphy,et al.  Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality , 2009 .

[25]  Murray Shanahan,et al.  Perception as Abduction: Turning Sensor Data Into Meaningful Representation , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  J. Brewer Imagining The Sociological Imagination: the biographical context of a sociological classic. , 2004, British Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Lorenzo Magnani,et al.  Logical and Computational Aspects of Model-Based Reasoning , 2002 .

[28]  A. Estany The Thesis of Theory-Laden Observation in the Light of Cognitive Psychology , 2001, Philosophy of Science.

[29]  L. Magnani Abduction, Reason, and Science. Process of Discovery and Explanation , 2001 .

[30]  R. Brandom Articulating Reasons , 2000 .

[31]  Theo A.F. Kuipers,et al.  Abduction aiming at empirical progress or eventruth approximationleading to a challenge for computational modelling , 1999 .

[32]  S. Haack Precis of Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology@@@Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. , 1996 .

[33]  I. Niiniluoto The aim and structure of applied research , 1993 .

[34]  K. Korb Explaining Science* , 1991, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[35]  Paolo Mancarella,et al.  Abductive Logic Programming , 1992, LPNMR.

[36]  P. Thagard,et al.  Computational Philosophy of Science , 1988 .

[37]  K. T. Fann Peirce's theory of abduction , 1970 .