Investigation of the effects of gender and preparation on quality of communication in Internet support groups

Abstract The present study examined communication among males and females participating in Internet support groups. Previous qualitative research on Internet support groups has suggested that female cancer patients exhibit higher levels of emotional expression than males, and male cancer patients use Internet support groups for information exchange. We developed a laboratory-based protocol for investigating gender differences in online communication, testing the hypothesis that preparation for the online groups would increase levels of disclosure. One hundred and sixty-seven undergraduates were enrolled in same-gender support groups to discuss the shared experience of having a loved one with cancer. Participants were randomized to one of three preparation groups: minimal instruction, detailed instruction with social modeling, and detailed instruction with social modeling and practice. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count was used to measure levels of emotional and cognitive expression in messages sent to the group. Participants used increasing levels of emotional and cognitive expression over time; this pattern was not altered by preparation and did not differ between males and females. The levels of emotional and cognitive expression during Internet communication suggest that the Internet may be a viable medium for the provision of psychosocial services to people in need of supportive care, such as cancer patients.

[1]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Forming a story: the health benefits of narrative. , 1999, Journal of clinical psychology.

[2]  S. Shoptaw,et al.  Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient. , 1986, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  C. Whalen,et al.  Effects of Role and Gender Mix on Verbal Communication Modes. , 1977 .

[4]  P. Houts,et al.  Preparation of patients for group therapy. A controlled study. , 1967, Archives of general psychiatry.

[5]  C. Whalen Effects of a Model and Instructions on Group Verbal Behaviors. , 1969 .

[6]  Martha E. Francis,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Linguistic Predictors of Adaptive Bereavement , 2022 .

[7]  J. Pennebaker Writing About Emotional Experiences as a Therapeutic Process , 1997 .

[8]  N. Weinberg,et al.  Therapeutic Factors: Their Presence in a Computer-Mediated Support Group , 1995 .

[9]  B. Allen Gender and computer-mediated communication , 1995 .

[10]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  A Social Stage Model of Collective Coping: The Loma Prieta Earthquake and The Persian Gulf War , 1993 .

[11]  J. Snibbe,et al.  A Comparison of Computer-Assisted Psychotherapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Groups , 1998, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings.

[12]  Martha E. Francis,et al.  Cognitive, Emotional, and Language Processes in Disclosure , 1996 .

[13]  A. D’augelli,et al.  Interpersonal skills and pretraining: implications for the use of group procedures for interpersonal learning and for the selection of nonprofessional mental health workers. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  M. Gatz,et al.  Credibility and desirability of positive and negative structured feedback in groups. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[15]  J. Epstein,et al.  From Eliza to Internet: a brief history of computerized assessment , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  P. Schwartz,et al.  Psychosocial benefits of a cancer support group , 1986, Cancer.

[17]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Feedback. II. The "credibility gap": delivery of positive and negative and emotional and behavioral feedback in groups. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  J. Finn Computer-Based Self-Help Groups , 1995 .

[19]  Feedback III: Sequence Effects , 1975 .

[20]  H. Strupp,et al.  Preparing lower-class patients for group psychotherapy: development and evaluation of a role-induction film. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  Stanley Schachter,et al.  The Psychology of Affiliation: Experimental Studies of the Sources of Gregariousness , 1959 .

[22]  P. Klemm,et al.  Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. , 1999, Computers in nursing.

[23]  L. Adrianson,et al.  Gender and computer-mediated communication: group processes in problem solving , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  B. F. Sharf Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. , 1997, Women & health.

[25]  C. Classen,et al.  Group Therapy For Cancer Patients: A Research-based Handbook Of Psychosocial Care , 2000 .

[26]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[27]  J. Pennebaker Putting stress into words: health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. , 1993, Behaviour research and therapy.