Exploring Over: The Presumed Identity of Emerging Technology

While scientists are stepping up their efforts to develop new technologies, the ability of firms to determine the value of their technologies by identifying potential applications has become a major challenge. This article focuses on a particular phase of technology development: the emergence phase. When a promising new technology first sees the light of day in a fundamental research laboratory, its target markets often seem plentiful but are ill-defined. The inability to produce prototypes or to identify potential users makes it difficult to explore potential commercial applications. On the basis of four micro-nanotechnologies case-studies conducted within a multi-partner innovation project, this article aims to theoretically explain why the identification of applications from emerging technologies is not a trivial problem. That research analyses how technologists and non-experts interact during creative investigations on new applications. It shows that the technologists are victims of a form of cognitive fixation effect. Indeed, their beliefs and activities are guided by a stable cognitive representation of their technology: the presumed identity of technology. Based on a recent design framework, C-K Design Theory, the technological exploration process followed in our four case-studies is modeled and mechanisms to dismantle the presumed identity and to design an extended identity of technology are provided.

[1]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[2]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Collaborative Research in Organizations , 2004 .

[3]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Towards Design Theory and expandable rationality : The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. 1 , 2003 .

[4]  KA Thleen,et al.  Building Theories from Case Study , 2007 .

[5]  Gary Garrison,et al.  Understanding users' behaviors regarding supply chain technology: Determinants impacting the adoption and implementation of RFID technology in South Korea , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[6]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Management of "technology push" development projects , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[7]  Markus Glaser,et al.  Triz for Reverse Inventing in Market Research: A Case Study from Wittenstein AG, Identifying New Areas of Application of a Core Technology , 2009 .

[8]  Lisa C . Troy,et al.  Cross-Functional Integration and New Product Success: An Empirical Investigation of the Findings , 2008 .

[9]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: casting and improving ASIT within C–K theory , 2012 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The Emergence of Emerging Technologies , 2002 .

[11]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Strategic Management of Innovation and Design , 2010 .

[12]  D. Langley,et al.  Exploring the market for breakthrough technologies , 2007 .

[13]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Managing Experimentation in the Design of New Products , 1998 .

[14]  Alexander Brem,et al.  Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management—Insights from the German software industry , 2009 .

[15]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  Extending the C–K design theory: A theoretical background for personal design assistants , 2005 .

[16]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[17]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[18]  William E. Souder,et al.  Improving Productivity Through Technology Push , 1989 .

[19]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  What Scientific Thinking Reveals About the Nature of Cognition , 2000 .

[20]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Towards holistic front ends in new product development , 1998 .

[21]  R. Fair,et al.  Electrowetting-based actuation of droplets for integrated microfluidics. , 2002, Lab on a chip.

[22]  Pascal Le Masson,et al.  The Value of a 'Failed' R&D Project: An Emerging Evaluation Framework for Building Innovative Capabilities , 2009 .

[23]  Scott L. Newbert,et al.  Defining the Relationship among Founding Resources, Strategies, and Performance in Technology‐Intensive New Ventures: Evidence from the Semiconductor Silicon Industry** , 2007 .

[24]  K. Crowley,et al.  Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings. , 2001 .

[25]  Michael Heiss,et al.  The technology tree concept-an evolutionary approach to technology management in a rapidly changing market , 2001, IEMC'01 Proceedings. Change Management and the New Industrial Revolution. IEMC-2001 (Cat. No.01CH37286).

[26]  Mauro Caetano,et al.  Roadmapping for technology push and partnership: A contribution for open innovation environments , 2011 .

[27]  S. R. Rosenthal,et al.  Towards holistic front ends in new product development , 1998 .

[28]  J. Landau,et al.  Conformity to Experimenter‐Provided Examples: Will People use an Unusual Feature? , 2004 .

[29]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Differentiating market strategies for disruptive technologies , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[30]  Thomas Gillier,et al.  Managing Innovation Fields in a Cross‐Industry Exploratory Partnership with C–K Design Theory* , 2010 .

[31]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  Creating Value with Science and Technology , 2001 .

[32]  Blanche Segrestin,et al.  Towards a New Logic for Front End Management: From Drug Discovery to Drug Design in Pharmaceutical R&D , 2007 .

[33]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products , 1988 .

[34]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model , 2004 .

[35]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change , 1993 .

[36]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network , 1995 .

[37]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[38]  Ghislaine M. Lawrence The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology , 1989, Medical History.

[39]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  A theory of innovation for process-based innovations such as nanotechnology , 2008 .

[41]  Finn Schou 14th International Conference on Management of Technology , 2005 .

[42]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  The Innovation Algorithm:TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity , 1999 .

[43]  Sihem Ben Mahmoud-Jouini,et al.  Enhancing Discontinuous Innovation through Knowledge Combination: The Case of an Exploratory Unit within an Established Automotive Firm , 2008 .

[44]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Management of "technology push" development projects , 2004, International Journal of Technology Management.

[45]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  Roland Valori,et al.  Improving productivity , 2010, Frontline Gastroenterology.

[47]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Using Evolved Analogies to Overcome Creative Design Fixation , 2011 .

[48]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach , 2009 .

[49]  Jochen Runde,et al.  On the Identity of Technological Objects and User Innovations in Function , 2009 .

[50]  Beat Birkenmeier,et al.  Management Principles for Evaluating and Introducing Disruptive Technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology in Switzerland , 2003 .

[51]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A NEW APPROACH OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN : AN INTRODUCTION TO C-K THEORY. , 2003 .

[52]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[53]  Christine M. Shea Future management research directions in nanotechnology: A case study , 2005 .

[54]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  Identifying Technology Applications Using an Adaptation of the Lead User Method , 2010 .

[55]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[56]  G. Lynn,et al.  Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process , 1996 .

[57]  Rodney L. Custer,et al.  Examining the dimensions of technology , 1995 .

[58]  Martin G. Moehrle,et al.  TRIZ-based technology-roadmapping , 2004 .

[59]  Denis Cavallucci,et al.  Linking Contradictions and Laws of Engineering System Evolution within the Triz Framework , 2009 .

[60]  Thomas Gillier,et al.  CO-DESIGNING BROAD SCOPE OF TECHNOLOGY-BASED APPLICATIONS IN AN EXPLORATORY PARTNERSHIP , 2008 .

[61]  Henrique Rozenfeld,et al.  Integrating technology roadmapping and portfolio management at the front-end of new product development , 2010 .

[62]  Steve Caplin,et al.  Principles Of Design , 2011 .

[63]  H. Barrett,et al.  Functional Fixedness in a Technologically Sparse Culture , 2005, Psychological science.

[64]  A. Shani,et al.  Collaborative research in organizations : foundations for learning, change, and theoretical development , 2003 .

[65]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Exploring the Contributions of Involving Ordinary Users in Ideation of Technology‐Based Services* , 2009 .

[66]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[67]  Semyon Savransky,et al.  Engineering of Creativity: Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving , 2000 .

[68]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[69]  B. Segrestin Partnering to explore: The Renault–Nissan Alliance as a forerunner of new cooperative patterns , 2005 .

[70]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[71]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Action research for operations management , 2002 .

[72]  H. A. Lingstone,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .