The gap between rod and frame influences the rod-and-frame effect with small and large inducing displays

The role of the spatial separation between the ends of a rod and a frame’s inner edge (gap) in modulating the rod-and-frame effect (RFE) has been studied here with frames subtending either large or small retinal angles. With a large frame, rod settings were always in the direction of frame tilt (direct effects) and varied inversely with gap size. With a small frame, rod settings were in the direction of frame tilt for tilts between 7.5° and 15°; with larger frame tilts, rod settings in the direction opposite that of the frame were observed (indirect effects). Increasing gap size produced a tendency toward negativity (away from frame tilt). Consequently, direct effects were larger for small gaps, while the opposite was true for indirect effects. Overall, these results point to the importance of gap size in modulating the RFE, for both large and small displays.

[1]  M Flannagan,et al.  Subjective Estimates of Body Tilt and the Rod-and-Frame Test , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  A. Hartley,et al.  The roles of axes of symmetry in orientation illusions , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Two-Dimensional Tilt Illusions Induced by Orthogonal Plaid Patterns: Effects of Plaid Motion, Orientation, Spatial Separation, and Spatial Frequency , 1989, Perception.

[4]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  Spatial and Orientation Specific Integration in the Tilt Illusion , 1989, Perception.

[5]  Eric Sigman,et al.  A cognitive-style conception of the field-dependence dimension , 1985 .

[6]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  Determinants of the rod-and-frame effect: Role of organization and subjective contour , 1980 .

[7]  D. Spinelli,et al.  The role of frame size on vertical and horizontal observers in the rod-and-frame illusion. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Eric Sigman,et al.  Instructions, Illusory Self-Tilt and the Rod-and-Frame Test , 1979 .

[9]  Sheldon M. Ebenholtz,et al.  The rod and frame effect and induced head tilt as a function of observation distance , 1977 .

[10]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  Absence of depth processing in the large-frame rod-and-frame effect , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Depth adjacency and the rod-and-frame illusion , 1975 .

[12]  P K Oltman,et al.  Orientation contrast effects in the rod-and-frame test , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  P. Wenderoth.  The Distinction between the Rod-and-Frame Illusion and the Rod-and-Frame Test , 1974, Perception.

[14]  S. Coren,et al.  An orientation illusion analog to the rod and frame: Relational effects in the magnitude of the distortion , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  D. Goodenough,et al.  Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus , 1979, Vision Research.

[16]  Norbert Bischof,et al.  Optic-Vestibular Orientation to the Vertical , 1974 .

[17]  K. Koffka.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[18]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  Absence of relational determination in the rod-and-frame effect , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.