Atypical and typical (idiopathic) slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Reconfirmation of the age-weight test and description of the height and age-height tests.

BACKGROUND The age-weight test was described to aid the clinician in defining demographic predictors of an atypical slipped capital femoral epiphysis. We wished to retest the accuracy and applicability of the age-weight test and height differences in children with atypical and typical slipped capital femoral epiphyses. METHODS A retrospective review of the records for all children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis from 1998 through 2003 was performed. Gender, race, chronological age, weight, height, the duration of symptoms, and the laterality of the slip were recorded. The slip angle was classified as mild (< 30 degrees), moderate (30 to 50 degrees), or severe (> 50 degrees). Statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS The study included 105 children (thirty-eight girls and sixty-seven boys) with 141 slipped capital femoral epiphyses; ten children had fifteen atypical slipped capital femoral epiphyses, and ninety-five children had 126 typical slipped capital femoral epiphyses. Sixty-nine children had unilateral involvement, and thirty-six had bilateral involvement. The average age at the time of presentation for the first slipped capital femoral epiphysis was 12.1 +/- 2.0 years. The average duration of symptoms was 3.7 +/- 5.5 months. In the group of 128 slipped capital femoral epiphyses for which the slip angle was known, there were ninety-three mild, twenty-seven moderate, and eight severe slips. The average slip angle was 24 degrees +/- 18 degrees. The age-weight test demonstrated a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value of 33%, and a negative predictive value of 94%. The age-height test, involving the same definition as the age-weight test except that the percentiles apply to height and not weight, demonstrated a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 73%, a positive predictive value of 30%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. The height test, which was defined as positive if the child's height was at or below the tenth percentile for age and as negative if it was above the tenth percentile, demonstrated a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 97%, a positive predictive value of 75%, and a negative predictive value of 97%. CONCLUSIONS The present study reaffirmed the accuracy and applicability of the age-weight test for differentiating between typical and atypical slipped capital femoral epiphyses, and it further defined the age-height and height tests. If the height of a child can be obtained, the height test is likely to be most useful for differentiating between typical and atypical slipped capital femoral epiphysis. When height is not known, the age-weight test will result in a similar negative predictive value but with a lower sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  M. Kocher,et al.  Prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Brian G Smith,et al.  Prophylactic Pinning of the Contralateral Hip in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Evaluation of Long-Term Outcome for the Contralateral Hip with Use of Decision Analysis , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  S. Weinstein ICOE welcomes JBJS and OREF as partners. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  R. Loder,et al.  Clinical Characteristics of Children With Atypical and Idiopathic Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Description of the Age–Weight Test and Implications for Further Diagnostic Investigation , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[5]  B. Alman,et al.  Short stature as a screening test for endocrinopathy in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  H. Grasemann,et al.  Serum insulin-like growth factors IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. , 1999, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[7]  R. Hensinger,et al.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with radiation therapy. , 1998, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[8]  R. Szabo Principles of epidemiology for the orthopaedic surgeon. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  R. Szabo Current Concepts Review Principles of Epidemiology for the Orthopaedic Surgeon , 1998 .

[10]  R. Hensinger,et al.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with renal failure osteodystrophy. , 1997, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[11]  P. Stasikelis,et al.  Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis. Prediction of Contralateral Involvement* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  R. Loder,et al.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with endocrine disorders. , 1995, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[13]  T. Roe,et al.  Review of slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with endocrine disease. , 1993, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[14]  R. Hensinger,et al.  Narrow Window of Bone Age in Children with Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses , 1993, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[15]  R. Loder,et al.  Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stability. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  E. Millar,et al.  Skeletal Disorders in a Pediatric Renal Transplant Population , 1989, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[17]  I. Brenkel,et al.  Hormone status in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  D. Mann,et al.  Hormonal Studies in Patients with Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Without Evidence of Endocrinopathy , 1988, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[19]  N. Carroll,et al.  Clubfoot Analysis with Three‐Dimensional Computer Modeling , 1988, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[20]  R. Hensinger,et al.  Thick lips, bumpy tongue, and slipped capital femoral epiphysis--a deadly combination. , 1988, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[21]  I. Brenkel,et al.  Thyroid Hormone Levels in Patients with Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis , 1988, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[22]  I. Barrett Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Following Radiotherapy , 1985, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[23]  P. McAfee,et al.  ENDOCRINOLOGIC AND METABOLIC FACTORS IN ATYPICAL PRESENTATIONS OF SLIPPED CAPITAL FEMORAL EPIPHYSIS. REPORT OF FOUR CASES AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 1984 .

[24]  P. McAfee,et al.  Endocrinologic and metabolic factors in atypical presentations of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Report of four cases and review of the literature. , 1983, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[25]  A. Alter,et al.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: Long term follow-up study of one-hundred and twenty-one patients , 1981 .

[26]  W M Moore,et al.  Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles. , 1979, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[27]  Alex F. Roche,et al.  Worldwide Variation in Human Growth , 1978 .

[28]  D. Weiner,et al.  Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  B. Weiner,et al.  Discoid medial meniscus: association with bone changes in the tibia. A case report. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  C. Razzano,et al.  Growth hormone levels in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  W. Southwick,et al.  Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. , 1967, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  Acheson Rm,et al.  The Oxford method of assessing skeletal maturity. , 1957 .

[33]  R. Acheson,et al.  The Oxford method of assessing skeletal maturity. , 1957, Clinical orthopaedics.