Fine‐scale spatial ecology drives kin selection relatedness among cooperating amoebae

Cooperation among microbes is important for traits as diverse as antibiotic resistance, pathogen virulence, and sporulation. The evolutionary stability of cooperation against “cheater” mutants depends critically on the extent to which microbes interact with genetically similar individuals. The causes of this genetic social structure in natural microbial systems, however, are unknown. Here, we show that social structure among cooperative Dictyostelium amoebae is driven by the population ecology of colonization, growth, and dispersal acting at spatial scales as small as fruiting bodies themselves. Despite the fact that amoebae disperse while grazing, all it takes to create substantial genetic clonality within multicellular fruiting bodies is a few millimeters distance between the cells colonizing a feeding site. Even adjacent fruiting bodies can consist of different genotypes. Soil populations of amoebae are sparse and patchily distributed at millimeter scales. The fine‐scale spatial structure of cells and genotypes can thus account for the otherwise unexplained high genetic uniformity of spores in fruiting bodies from natural substrates. These results show how a full understanding of microbial cooperation requires understanding ecology and social structure at the small spatial scales microbes themselves experience.

[1]  J. Strassmann,et al.  In the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, density, not farming status, determines predatory success on unpalatable Escherichia coli , 2014, BMC Microbiology.

[2]  François Taddei,et al.  Genetic information transfer promotes cooperation in bacteria , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  W. Loomis,et al.  Cell signaling during development of Dictyostelium. , 2014, Developmental biology.

[4]  Sam P. Brown,et al.  War and peace: social interactions in infections , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Fruiting bodies of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum increase spore transport by Drosophila , 2014, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[6]  G. Kowalchuk,et al.  Impact of Matric Potential and Pore Size Distribution on Growth Dynamics of Filamentous and Non-Filamentous Soil Bacteria , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  S. West,et al.  Cooperation, Quorum Sensing, and Evolution of Virulence in Staphylococcus aureus , 2013, Infection and Immunity.

[8]  Jeff Gore,et al.  Bacterial cheating drives the population dynamics of cooperative antibiotic resistance plasmids , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[9]  Keenan M. L. Mack,et al.  Spatial Population Expansion Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation in an Experimental Prisoner’s Dilemma , 2013, Current Biology.

[10]  Manoshi Sen Datta,et al.  Range expansion promotes cooperation in an experimental microbial metapopulation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Roland R. Regoes,et al.  Stabilization of cooperative virulence by the expression of an avirulent phenotype , 2013, Nature.

[12]  A. Gardner,et al.  Quorum Sensing and the Confusion about Diffusion , 2022 .

[13]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Structured growth and genetic drift raise relatedness in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2012, Biology Letters.

[14]  J. Strassmann,et al.  High relatedness in a social amoeba: the role of kin-discriminatory segregation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  A. Griffin,et al.  The Dynamics of Cooperative Bacterial Virulence in the Field , 2012, Science.

[16]  J. Strassmann,et al.  High Relatedness Is Necessary and Sufficient to Maintain Multicellularity in Dictyostelium , 2011, Science.

[17]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Kin discrimination and cooperation in microbes. , 2011, Annual review of microbiology.

[18]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Self-Recognition in Social Amoebae Is Mediated by Allelic Pairs of Tiger Genes , 2011, Science.

[19]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Evolution of cooperation and control of cheating in a social microbe , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  THE CONCURRENT EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION AND THE POPULATION STRUCTURES THAT SUPPORT IT , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  J. Wolf,et al.  A Simple Mechanism for Complex Social Behavior , 2011, PLoS biology.

[22]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  D. Portnoy,et al.  A Generalization of Hamilton’s Rule for the Evolution of Microbial Cooperation , 2010, Science.

[24]  Carey D. Nadell,et al.  Emergence of Spatial Structure in Cell Groups and the Evolution of Cooperation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  Andy Gardner,et al.  Ecological drivers of the evolution of public-goods cooperation in bacteria. , 2010, Ecology.

[26]  M. Vos,et al.  Social Conflict in Centimeter-and Global-Scale Populations of the Bacterium Myxococcus xanthus , 2009, Current Biology.

[27]  Freya Harrison,et al.  Viscous medium promotes cooperation in the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  K. Holsinger,et al.  Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting FST , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  A. Griffin,et al.  Density Dependence and Cooperation: Theory and a Test with Bacteria , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  Jason B. Wolf,et al.  Quantification of Social Behavior in D. discoideum Reveals Complex Fixed and Facultative Strategies , 2009, Current Biology.

[31]  J. Bever,et al.  Kin competition and the evolution of cooperation. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Polymorphic Members of the lag Gene Family Mediate Kin Discrimination in Dictyostelium , 2009, Current Biology.

[33]  Stanislas Leibler,et al.  Simpson's Paradox in a Synthetic Microbial System , 2009, Science.

[34]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Kin Discrimination Increases with Genetic Distance in a Social Amoeba , 2008, PLoS biology.

[35]  Michael E Hochberg,et al.  The coevolution of cooperation and dispersal in social groups and its implications for the emergence of multicellularity , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[36]  E. Greenberg,et al.  Genetic Determinants of Self Identity and Social Recognition in Bacteria , 2008, Science.

[37]  Anup Parikh,et al.  Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae , 2008, Nature.

[38]  Andy Gardner,et al.  Resource supply and the evolution of public-goods cooperation in bacteria , 2008 .

[39]  D. Nelson,et al.  Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  A. Griffin,et al.  The Social Lives of Microbes , 2007 .

[41]  Kevin R Foster,et al.  High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  A. Gardner,et al.  Cooperation Peaks at Intermediate Disturbance , 2007, Current Biology.

[43]  G. Shaulsky,et al.  Social evolution: Kin preference in a social microbe , 2006, Nature.

[44]  R. MacLean,et al.  Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast , 2006, Nature.

[45]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Adaptive Evolution of Social Traits: Origin, Trajectories, and Correlations of Altruism and Mobility , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[46]  Jean YH Yang,et al.  Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics , 2004, Genome Biology.

[47]  D. Greig,et al.  The Prisoner's Dilemma and polymorphism in yeast SUC genes , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  H. B. Suthers Ground-feeding migratory songbirds as cellular slime mold distribution vectors , 1985, Oecologia.

[49]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Co‐occurrence in nature of different clones of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[50]  B. Finlay Global Dispersal of Free-Living Microbial Eukaryote Species , 2002, Science.

[51]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Altruism and social cheating in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2000, Nature.

[52]  J. Pepper,et al.  Relatedness in trait group models of social evolution. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[53]  D. Knecht,et al.  Variables controlling the expression level of exogenous genes in Dictyostelium. , 1999, Plasmid.

[54]  D. Francis,et al.  Genetic structure of a natural population of Dictyostelium discoideum, a cellular slime mould , 1993, Molecular ecology.

[55]  D. Queller,et al.  A GENERAL MODEL FOR KIN SELECTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  M. J. Huss Dispersal of Cellular Slime Molds by two Soil Invertebrates , 1989 .

[57]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[58]  David R. Waddel The spatial pattern of aggregation centres in the cellular slime mould , 1982 .

[59]  R. Eisenberg Two‐Dimensional Microdistribution or Cellular Slime Molds in Forest Soil , 1976 .

[60]  K. Raper,et al.  THE ACRASIEAE IN NATURE. II. FOREST SOIL AS A PRIMARY HABITAT. , 1965, American journal of botany.

[61]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.