Quantum proof systems for iterated exponential time, and beyond

We show that any language solvable in nondeterministic time exp( exp(⋯exp(n))), where the number of iterated exponentials is an arbitrary function R(n), can be decided by a multiprover interactive proof system with a classical polynomial-time verifier and a constant number of quantum entangled provers, with completeness 1 and soundness 1 − exp(−Cexp(⋯exp(n))), where the number of iterated exponentials is R(n)−1 and C>0 is a universal constant. The result was previously known for R=1 and R=2; we obtain it for any time-constructible function R. The result is based on a compression technique for interactive proof systems with entangled provers that significantly simplifies and strengthens a protocol compression result of Ji (STOC’17). As a separate consequence of this technique we obtain a different proof of Slofstra’s recent result on the uncomputability of the entangled value of multiprover games (Forum of Mathematics, Pi 2019). Finally, we show that even minor improvements to our compression result would yield remarkable consequences in computational complexity theory and the foundations of quantum mechanics: first, it would imply that the class MIP* contains all computable languages; second, it would provide a negative resolution to a multipartite version of Tsirelson’s problem on the relation between the commuting operator and tensor product models for quantum correlations.

[1]  Zheng-Feng Ji,et al.  Compression of quantum multi-prover interactive proofs , 2016, STOC.

[2]  A. Steane Multiple-particle interference and quantum error correction , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Shor,et al.  Good quantum error-correcting codes exist. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[4]  M. Junge,et al.  Connes' embedding problem and Tsirelson's problem , 2010, 1008.1142.

[5]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  The Quantum Moment Problem and Bounds on Entangled Multi-prover Games , 2008, 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[6]  William Slofstra,et al.  THE SET OF QUANTUM CORRELATIONS IS NOT CLOSED , 2017, Forum of Mathematics, Pi.

[7]  Y. Lafont Word Problem , 2019, 99 Variations on a Proof.

[8]  Sanjeev Arora,et al.  Probabilistic checking of proofs: a new characterization of NP , 1998, JACM.

[9]  William Slofstra,et al.  Tsirelson’s problem and an embedding theorem for groups arising from non-local games , 2016, Journal of the American Mathematical Society.

[10]  John Watrous,et al.  Quantum Computational Complexity , 2008, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[11]  T. Fritz TSIRELSON'S PROBLEM AND KIRCHBERG'S CONJECTURE , 2010, 1008.1168.

[12]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  Test for a large amount of entanglement, using few measurements , 2018, Quantum.

[13]  Steane,et al.  Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[14]  Narutaka Ozawa,et al.  About the Connes embedding conjecture , 2013 .

[15]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation , 2004, 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[16]  Vincent Russo,et al.  Extended non-local games and monogamy-of-entanglement games , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  O G Harlampovič,et al.  A FINITELY PRESENTED SOLVABLE GROUP WITH UNSOLVABLE WORD PROBLEM , 1982 .

[18]  Rahul Jain,et al.  QIP = PSPACE , 2011, JACM.

[19]  H. Nagaoka,et al.  A new proof of the channel coding theorem via hypothesis testing in quantum information theory , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory,.

[20]  Andrea Coladangelo,et al.  Robust self-testing for linear constraint system games , 2017, 1709.09267.

[21]  Tsuyoshi Ito,et al.  A Multi-prover Interactive Proof for NEXP Sound against Entangled Provers , 2012, 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[22]  A. Connes,et al.  Classification of Injective Factors Cases II 1 , II ∞ , III λ , λ 1 , 1976 .

[23]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  Hardness amplification for entangled games via anchoring , 2017, STOC.

[24]  Carsten Lund,et al.  Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols , 2005, computational complexity.

[25]  Mikhail N. Vyalyi,et al.  Classical and Quantum Computation , 2002, Graduate studies in mathematics.

[26]  Peter Høyer,et al.  Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies , 2004, Proceedings. 19th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2004..

[27]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  A three-player coherent state embezzlement game , 2018, Quantum.

[28]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  Low-degree testing for quantum states , 2018 .

[29]  Yaoyun Shi Both Toffoli and controlled-NOT need little help to do universal quantum computing , 2003, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[30]  Thomas Vidick,et al.  Three-Player Entangled XOR Games Are NP-Hard to Approximate , 2013, 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[31]  Anand Natarajan,et al.  A quantum linearity test for robustly verifying entanglement , 2017, STOC.

[32]  Michael J. Fischer,et al.  Relations Among Complexity Measures , 1979, JACM.

[33]  M. Wolf,et al.  Undecidability of the spectral gap , 2015, Nature.

[34]  Joseph Fitzsimons,et al.  A Multiprover Interactive Proof System for the Local Hamiltonian Problem , 2014, ITCS.

[35]  Tsuyoshi Ito,et al.  Quantum interactive proofs with weak error bounds , 2010, ITCS '12.

[36]  A. Acín,et al.  A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations , 2008, 0803.4290.

[37]  Carsten Lund,et al.  Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems , 1992, Proceedings., 33rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[38]  Matthew Coudron,et al.  Complexity lower bounds for computing the approximately-commuting operator value of non-local games to high precision , 2019, CCC.

[39]  Anand Natarajan,et al.  Low-Degree Testing for Quantum States, and a Quantum Entangled Games PCP for QMA , 2018, 2018 IEEE 59th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[40]  Anand Natarajan,et al.  Two-player entangled games are NP-hard , 2018, Computational Complexity Conference.

[41]  Zheng-Feng Ji,et al.  Classical verification of quantum proofs , 2015, STOC.