Learning environment, attitudes and conceptual development associated with innovative strategies in middle-school mathematics

This study of middle-school students in California focused on the effectiveness of using innovative teaching strategies for enhancing the classroom environment, students’ attitudes and conceptual development. A sample of 661 students from 22 classrooms in four inner city schools completed modified forms of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES), What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) questionnaire and Test of Mathematics Related Attitudes (TOMRA). Data analyses supported the factor structure, internal consistency reliability, discriminant validity and the ability to distinguish between different classes for these questionnaires when used with middle-school mathematics students in California. The effectiveness of the innovative instructional strategy was evaluated in terms of classroom environment and attitudes to mathematics for the whole sample, as well as for mathematics achievement for a subgroup of 101 students. A comparison of an experimental group which experienced the innovative strategy with a control group supported the efficacy of the innovative teaching methods in terms of learning environment, attitudes and mathematics concept development. Also associations were found between perceptions of classroom learning environment and students’ attitudes to mathematics and conceptual development.

[1]  Bruce Thompson,et al.  Book Reviews , 1998 .

[2]  Campbell J. McRobbie,et al.  Associations Between Student Outcomes and Psychosocial Science Environment , 1993 .

[3]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments , 1997 .

[4]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Environment--Attitude Associations in the Chemistry Laboratory Classroom , 1996 .

[5]  Myint Swe Khine,et al.  Studies In Educational Learning Environments: An International Perspective , 2002 .

[6]  Sharon H. Harwell,et al.  Technology Integration and the Classroom Learning Environment: Research for Action , 2001 .

[7]  Jill M. Aldridge,et al.  Constructivist learning environments in a crossnational study in Taiwan and Australia , 2000 .

[8]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Using Environmental Assessments to Make Better Classrooms. , 1981 .

[9]  Jill M. Aldridge,et al.  Investigating Classroom Environments in Taiwan and Australia With Multiple Research Methods , 1999 .

[10]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  CLASSROOM CLIMATE AND INDIVIDUAL LEARNING. , 1968 .

[11]  Dorit Maor,et al.  Use of classroom environment perceptions in evaluating inquiry‐based computer‐assisted learning , 1996 .

[12]  B. Fraser,et al.  Evaluation of a K–5 Mathematics Program Which Integrates Children’s Literature: Classroom Environment and Attitudes , 2005 .

[13]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Assessment and Investigation of Constructivist Science Learning Environments in Korea , 1999 .

[14]  Jeffrey P. Dorman,et al.  Cross-National Validation of the What is Happening in this Class? (WIHIC) Questionnaire using Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2003 .

[15]  Jill M. Aldridge,et al.  Using teacher action research to promote constructivist learning environments in South Africa , 2004 .

[16]  B. Fraser.  Science Learning Environments: Assessment, Effects and Determinants , 1998 .

[17]  LEARNING ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH IN INDONESIA , 2002 .

[18]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[19]  John C. Happs,et al.  Using Grade Eight Students' Existing Knowledge to Teach About Parallel Lines , 1992 .

[20]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Classroom Environment and Teacher Interpersonal Behaviour in Secondary Science Classes in Korea , 2000 .

[21]  Bruce Thompson,et al.  Five Methodology Errors in Educational Research: The Pantheon of Statistical Significance and Other Faux Pas. , 1998 .

[22]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  An evaluation of computer‐assisted learning in terms of achievement, attitudes and classroom environment , 1994 .

[23]  David B. Zandvliet,et al.  Physical and Psychosocial Environments Associated with Networked Classrooms , 2005 .

[24]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Qualitative and Quantitative Landscapes of Classroom Learning Environments , 1998 .

[25]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Predicting Students’ Outcomes from Their Perceptions of Classroom Psychosocial Environment , 1982 .

[26]  Edison J. Trickett,et al.  Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. , 1973 .

[27]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Evaluating an Integrated Science Learning Environment Using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey , 2005 .

[28]  Art Johnson,et al.  Guiding children's learning of mathematics , 1984 .

[29]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Evaluation of an Innovative Mathematics Program in Terms of Classroom Environment, Student Attitudes, and Conceptual Development , 2005 .

[30]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[31]  Jeffrey P. Dorman,et al.  Associations Between Classroom Environment and Academic Efficacy , 2001 .

[32]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  Classroom Environment Instruments: Development, Validity and Applications , 1998 .