Tumor slice culture system to assess drug response of primary breast cancer

BackgroundThe high incidence of breast cancer has sparked the development of novel targeted and personalized therapies. Personalization of cancer treatment requires reliable prediction of chemotherapy responses in individual patients. Effective selection can prevent unnecessary treatment that would mainly result in the unwanted side effects of the therapy. This selection can be facilitated by characterization of individual tumors using robust and specific functional assays, which requires development of powerful ex vivo culture systems and procedures to analyze the response to treatment.MethodsWe optimized culture methods for primary breast tumor samples that allowed propagation of tissue ex vivo. We combined several tissue culture strategies, including defined tissue slicing technology, growth medium optimization and use of a rotating platform to increase nutrient exchange.ResultsWe could maintain tissue cultures for at least 7 days without losing tissue morphology, viability or cell proliferation. We also developed methods to determine the cytotoxic response of individual tumors to the chemotherapeutic treatment FAC (5-FU, Adriamycin [Doxorubicin] and Cyclophosphamide). Using this tool we designated tumors as sensitive or resistant and distinguished a clinically proven resistant tumor from other tumors.ConclusionThis method defines conditions that allow ex vivo testing of individual tumor responses to anti-cancer drugs and therefore might improve personalization of breast cancer treatment.

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[2]  A. Green,et al.  Short-term primary culture of epithelial cells derived from human breast tumours. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  A. Meyer,et al.  A new and reliable culture system for superficial low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder , 2007, World Journal of Urology.

[4]  R. Consolini,et al.  The Challenge of Culturing Human Colorectal Tumor Cells: Establishment of a Cell Culture Model by the Comparison of Different Methodological Approaches , 2009, Tumori.

[5]  J. Aten,et al.  Measurement of co‐localization of objects in dual‐colour confocal images , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  Valerie Speirs,et al.  Breast cancer cell lines: friend or foe? , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[7]  Saumyadipta Pyne,et al.  Preclinical model of organotypic culture for pharmacodynamic profiling of human tumors , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Long-term expansion of epithelial organoids from human colon, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and Barrett's epithelium. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[9]  B. Mohanti,et al.  Taxane and anthracycline based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: institutional experience. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[10]  A. Ruíz,et al.  Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus FAC followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: results from the GEICAM/2003-02 study. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  I. Bechmann,et al.  Slice cultures from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a novel test system for drug susceptibility and mechanisms of resistance , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  C. Dabrosin,et al.  Estradiol increases VEGF in human breast studied by whole-tissue culture , 2006, Cell and Tissue Research.

[13]  A. Hutcheon,et al.  A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. , 2003, Breast.

[14]  S. Dairkee,et al.  Selective cell culture of primary breast carcinoma. , 1995, Cancer research.

[15]  Humberto Sánchez,et al.  SFMetrics: an analysis tool for scanning force microscopy images of biomolecules , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Pathological non-response to chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting of breast cancer: an inter-institutional study , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[17]  P. Fritz,et al.  Short term culture of breast cancer tissues to study the activity of the anticancer drug taxol in an intact tumor environment , 2006, BMC Cancer.

[18]  E. Winer,et al.  Hormonal Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer , 2003, Oncology.

[19]  A. Sieuwerts,et al.  Functional Ex Vivo Assay to Select Homologous Recombination–Deficient Breast Tumors for PARP Inhibitor Treatment , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  H. Fiebig,et al.  Development of three human small cell lung cancer models in nude mice. , 1985, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[21]  R. Medema,et al.  Positivity of the proliferation marker Ki-67 in noncycling cells. , 1998, American journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  P. Houghton,et al.  Chemotherapy of childhood rhabdomyosarcomas growing as xenografts in immune-deprived mice. , 1982, Cancer research.

[23]  B. Greenwald The institutional experience , 2017 .

[24]  V. Speirs,et al.  The practicalities of using tissue slices as preclinical organotypic breast cancer models , 2012, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[25]  Q. Chu,et al.  The utility of a tissue slice model system to determine breast cancer infectivity by oncolytic adenoviruses. , 2010, The Journal of surgical research.

[26]  F. Kousar,et al.  Evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as a neoadjuvant therapy in patients with inoperable breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[27]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  Patient-derived xenograft models: an emerging platform for translational cancer research. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[28]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.