Decision-Making Using Random Boolean Networks In The El Farol Bar Problem

In our daily lives we often face binary decisions where we seek to take either the minority or the majority side. One of these binary decision scenarios is the El Farol Bar Problem, which has been used to study how agents achieve coordination. Previous works have shown that agents may reach appropriate levels of coordination, mostly by looking at their own individual strategies that consider the complete history of the bar attendance. No structure of the network of players has been explicitly considered. Here we use the formalism of random boolean networks to help agents to make decisions considering a network of other decision-makers. This is especially useful because random boolean networks allow the mapping of actions of K other agents (hence not based on complete history) to the decision-making of each single individual. Therefore a contribution of this work is the fact that we consider agents as participants of a social network. In the original proposition for this problem, strategies would change within time and eventually would lead agents to, collectively, decide on a efficient attendance, at each time step. Hence there was no explicit modeling of such a social network. Our results using random boolean networks show a similar pattern of convergence to an efficient attendance, provided agents do experimentation with the number of boolean functions, have a good update strategy, and a certain number of neighbors is considered.

[1]  Andrzej Bargiela,et al.  A model of granular data: a design problem with the Tchebyschev FCM , 2005, Soft Comput..

[2]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Resource allocation games with changing resource capacities , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[3]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[4]  M. R. Irving,et al.  Observability Determination in Power System State Estimation Using a Network Flow Technique , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Andrzej Bargiela,et al.  Fuzzy fractal dimensions and fuzzy modeling , 2003, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Yicheng Zhang,et al.  On the minority game: Analytical and numerical studies , 1998, cond-mat/9805084.

[7]  Terence C. Fogarty,et al.  Co-evolutionary classifier systems for multi-agent simulation , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[8]  Kagan Tumer,et al.  A Survey of Collectives , 2004 .

[9]  Rafael H. Bordini,et al.  Wayward agents in a commuting scenario (personalities in the minority game) , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[10]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Gossip, Sexual Recombination and the El Farol bar: modelling the emergence of heterogeneity , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[12]  W. Rand,et al.  MACHINE LEARNING MEETS AGENT-BASED MODELING : WHEN NOT TO , 2022 .

[13]  Kagan Tumer,et al.  Collective Intelligence for Control of Distributed Dynamical Systems , 1999, ArXiv.

[14]  Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al.  Emergence of cooperation and organization in an evolutionary game , 1997 .

[15]  W. Arthur Inductive Reasoning, Bounded Rationality and the Bar Problem , 1994 .

[16]  Andrzej Bargiela,et al.  Granular prototyping in fuzzy clustering , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[17]  P. M. Hui,et al.  Volatility and agent adaptability in a self-organizing market , 1998, cond-mat/9802177.