Spike Frequency Adaptation Implements Anticipative Tracking in Continuous Attractor Neural Networks

To extract motion information, the brain needs to compensate for time delays that are ubiquitous in neural signal transmission and processing. Here we propose a simple yet effective mechanism to implement anticipative tracking in neural systems. The proposed mechanism utilizes the property of spike-frequency adaptation (SFA), a feature widely observed in neuronal responses. We employ continuous attractor neural networks (CANNs) as the model to describe the tracking behaviors in neural systems. Incorporating SFA, a CANN exhibits intrinsic mobility, manifested by the ability of the CANN to support self-sustained travelling waves. In tracking a moving stimulus, the interplay between the external drive and the intrinsic mobility of the network determines the tracking performance. Interestingly, we find that the regime of anticipation effectively coincides with the regime where the intrinsic speed of the travelling wave exceeds that of the external drive. Depending on the SFA amplitudes, the network can achieve either perfect tracking, with zero-lag to the input, or perfect anticipative tracking, with a constant leading time to the input. Our model successfully reproduces experimentally observed anticipative tracking behaviors, and sheds light on our understanding of how the brain processes motion information in a timely manner.

[1]  Andreas V. M. Herz,et al.  A Universal Model for Spike-Frequency Adaptation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[2]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Theory of orientation tuning in visual cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R U Muller,et al.  Comparisons of head direction cell activity in the postsubiculum and anterior thalamus of freely moving rats , 1998, Hippocampus.

[4]  Si Wu,et al.  Neural Information Processing with Feedback Modulations , 2012, Neural Computation.

[5]  P. Bressloff Spatiotemporal dynamics of continuum neural fields , 2012 .

[6]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping in a Continuous Attractor Neural Network Model , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[8]  Si Wu,et al.  A Moving Bump in a Continuous Manifold: A Comprehensive Study of the Tracking Dynamics of Continuous Attractor Neural Networks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[9]  P. E. Sharp,et al.  Angular velocity and head direction signals recorded from the dorsal tegmental nucleus of gudden in the rat: implications for path integration in the head direction cell circuit. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[10]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex. , 1993, Science.

[11]  C. Koch,et al.  A brief history of time (constants). , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  J. Bullier,et al.  Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[13]  H. T. Blair,et al.  Anticipatory head direction signals in anterior thalamus: evidence for a thalamocortical circuit that integrates angular head motion to compute head direction , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  K. Zhang,et al.  Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  D. Touretzky,et al.  Modeling attractor deformation in the rodent head-direction system. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Edward J Golob,et al.  Passive movements of the head do not abolish anticipatory firing properties of head direction cells. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Si Wu,et al.  Compensating time delays with neural predictions: are predictions sensory or motor? , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Si Wu,et al.  Dynamical Synapses Enhance Neural Information Processing: Gracefulness, Accuracy, and Mobility , 2011, Neural Computation.

[19]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[20]  A. Compte,et al.  Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Si Wu,et al.  Delay Compensation with Dynamical Synapses , 2012, NIPS.

[22]  Boris S. Gutkin,et al.  Spike frequency adaptation , 2014, Scholarpedia.

[23]  Joël Tabak,et al.  Spike-Frequency Adaptation , 2014, Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience.