Client–vendor knowledge transfer in IS offshore outsourcing: insights from a survey of Indian software engineers

We use knowledge‐based theory to develop and test a model of client–vendor knowledge transfer at the level of the individual offshore information systems engineer. We define knowledge transfer in this context in terms of mechanisms by which an offshore engineer employed by a vendor can (a) gain understanding of their onshore client; and (b) utilize their knowledge for the benefit of the client. Over large geographic, cultural and institutional distances, effective knowledge transfer is difficult to achieve, although it is central to the success of many offshore outsourcing contracts. Our empirical test consists of a survey of vendor software engineers physically located in India but working on development projects for clients in Europe and the United States. The findings support predictions regarding engineer exposure to explicit and tacit knowledge: We find client–vendor knowledge transfer to the offshore vendor engineer to be positively associated with formal training and client embedment. We also test whether an offshore vendor engineer's inappropriate reliance on informal discussions in the offshore location hinders effective client–vendor knowledge transfer. Our result for this is mixed. Finally, we show differences between offshore engineers who have had previous onshore experience and those who have not. Client embedment is a potent driver of knowledge transfer when the offshore engineer has had previous onshore placement, while it acts to reduce inappropriate reliance on informal discussions for those that have not had an onshore placement.

[1]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[2]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[3]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[4]  Prescott C. Ensign,et al.  Innovation in the multinational firm with globally dispersed r&d: Technological knowledge utilization and accumulation , 1999 .

[5]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[6]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[7]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  Trust and Performance in Cross-Border Marketing Partnerships: A Behavioral Approach , 1996 .

[8]  J. Henley.  Outsourcing the Provision of Software and IT-Enabled Services to India: Emerging Strategies , 2006 .

[9]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[10]  Florian Taübe,et al.  When outsourcing is not an option: International relocation of investment bank research -- Or isn't it? , 2007 .

[11]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[13]  Alice Lam.  Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures , 1997 .

[14]  Arvind Parkhe.  International outsourcing of services: Introduction to the special issue , 2007 .

[15]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[16]  R CarlilePaul.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries , 2002 .

[17]  S. Pan,et al.  Knowledge transfer and organizational learning in IS offshore sourcing , 2008 .

[18]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[19]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[20]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  From Application Outsourcing to Infrastructure Management:: Extending the Offshore Outsourcing Service Portfolio , 2005 .

[21]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[22]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[23]  Ulrike de Brentani,et al.  Corporate Culture and Commitment: Impact on Performance of International New Product Development Programs , 2004 .

[24]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[25]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[26]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[27]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[28]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings , 1998 .

[29]  C. Chow,et al.  Cultural Influences On Adaptation To Fluid Workgroups And Teams , 2000 .

[30]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Managing Codified Knowledge , 1999 .

[32]  K. Lagerström,et al.  Creating and sharing knowledge within a transnational team—the development of a global business system , 2003 .

[33]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[34]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[35]  T. Kostova.  Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective , 1999 .

[36]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers , 2004 .

[37]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[38]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[39]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[40]  D. Robey,et al.  Foreword: special issue on information systems in developing countries , 2007 .

[41]  I. Nonaka,et al.  A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm , 2000 .

[42]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Learning, knowledge acquisition, and strategic alliances , 1998 .

[43]  Kannan Ramaswamy,et al.  Offshoring knowledge and service work: A conceptual model and research agenda , 2008 .

[44]  Peter Meso,et al.  Towards a model of consumer use of mobile information and communication technology in LDCs: the case of sub‐Saharan Africa , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[45]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure? , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[46]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Innovating or Doing as Told? Status Differences and Overlapping Boundaries in Offshore Collaboration , 2008, MIS Q..

[47]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Advancing formative measurement models , 2008 .

[48]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[50]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[51]  Aija Leiponen,et al.  Managing Knowledge for Innovation: The Case of Business‐to‐Business Services* , 2006 .

[52]  Pamela Abbott,et al.  Why 'nearshore' means that distance matters , 2007, CACM.

[53]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success , 2001, MIS Q..

[54]  Arie Y. Lewin,et al.  The globalization of white collar work - Facts and fallout of next generation offshoring , 2006 .

[55]  Mcdp Mathieu Weggeman,et al.  The Effect of IT and Co-location on Knowledge Dissemination , 2007 .

[56]  G. Hedlund.  A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[57]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[58]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Transformational Technologies and the Creation of New Work Practices: Making Implicit Knowledge Explicit in Task-based Offshoring , 2008, MIS Q..

[59]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  THE DOMINANT LOGIC: RETROSPECTIVE AND EXTENSION , 1995 .

[60]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[61]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in International Acquisitions , 1999 .

[62]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[63]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firm , 1995 .

[64]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[65]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Inside a software design team: knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration , 1993, CACM.

[66]  Narayan Ramasubbu,et al.  Work Dispersion, Process-Based Learning, and Offshore Software Development Performance , 2008, MIS Q..

[67]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  A qualitative study of information technology adoption: how ten organizations adopted Web‐based training , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[68]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.