Study of tracheal collapsibility, compliance and stress by considering its asymmetric geometry.

The shape of tracheal cartilage has been widely treated as symmetric in analytical and numerical models. However, according to both histological images and in vivo medical image, tracheal cartilage is of highly asymmetric shape. Taking the cartilage as symmetric structure will induce bias in calculation of the collapse behavior, as well as compliance and muscular stress. However, this has been rarely discussed. In this paper, tracheal collapse is represented by considering its asymmetric shape. For comparison, the symmetric shape, which is reconstructed by half of the cartilage, is also presented. A comparison of cross-sectional area, compliance of airway and stress in the muscular membrane, determined by asymmetric shape and symmetric shape is made. The result indicates that the symmetric assumption brings a small error, around 5% in predicting the cross-sectional area under loading conditions. The relative error of compliance is more than 10%. Particularly when the pressure is close to zero, the error could be more than 50%. The model considering the symmetric shape results in a significant difference in predicting stress in muscular membrane by either under- or over-estimating it. In conclusion, tracheal cartilage should not be treated as a symmetric structure. The results obtained in this study are helpful in evaluating the error induced by the assumption in geometry.

[1]  J. Bert,et al.  A method for estimating the Young's modulus of complete tracheal cartilage rings. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  C. Delpuech,et al.  A finite-element model of tracheal collapse. , 1988, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  C. Gans,et al.  Biomechanics: Motion, Flow, Stress, and Growth , 1990 .

[4]  T. Shaffer,et al.  Influence of smooth muscle tone and longitudinal tension on the collapsibility of immature airways , 1988, Pediatric pulmonology.

[5]  Liu Bao-yu,et al.  p-V Relationship and Limit Flow for Collapsible Trachea , 2001 .

[6]  Y C Fung,et al.  Residual strains in porcine and canine trachea. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  J. Petruccelli,et al.  Local Maximal Stress Hypothesis and Computational Plaque Vulnerability Index for Atherosclerotic Plaque Assessment , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  G B Fiore,et al.  A numerical and experimental study of compliance and collapsibility of preterm lamb tracheae. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  J L Bert,et al.  Ultrastructure and tensile properties of human tracheal cartilage. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. A. Bea,et al.  Nonlinear mechanical property of tracheal cartilage: a theoretical and experimental study. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Fufeng Li,et al.  Study on cartilaginous and muscular strains of rat trachea , 2004, Science in China Series C: Life Sciences.

[12]  G B Fiore,et al.  A model of neonatal tidal liquid ventilation mechanics. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  U Holzhäuser,et al.  Analysis of tracheal mechanics and applications. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  R. Ogden Non-Linear Elastic Deformations , 1984 .

[15]  Martin J Graves,et al.  Stress analysis of carotid plaque rupture based on in vivo high resolution MRI. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  J L Bert,et al.  Mechanical properties of human tracheal cartilage. , 1992, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  Sheng-dong Huang,et al.  Does PGA external stenting reduce compliance mismatch in venous grafts? , 2007, Biomedical engineering online.

[18]  T. Shaffer,et al.  Developmental Changes in Tracheal Structure , 1991, Pediatric Research.