Best Practices Kits for the ICT Governance Process within the Secretariat of State-Owned Companies of Brazil and Regarding these Public Companies

This article introduces an Information and Communication Technology Governance Kit to be used by the Brazilian Secretariat of Coordination and Governance of State Enterprises (in Portuguese, Secretaria de Coordenacao e Governanca das Empresas Estatais—SEST) in regards to its governed companies. The proposed kit is an instrument of targeting, which presents a set of best practices and conditioning aimed at the development and implementation of improvements in the management of ICT resources by Brazilian state-owned companies that are controlled by SEST. The proposed kit comprises three situation scenarios and four maturity levels. For each proposed process, the artifacts and templates are presented for the controlled companies to implement their respective processes so that these companies guide the improvements in their ICT governance maturity level. Considering that SEST is the principal entity in this governance structure, the main contribution of the proposed kits is to facilitate, guide and improve the maturity level of all Brazilian state-owned enterprises.

[1]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  IT Governance in Global Enterprises: Managing in Asia , 2008, ICIS.

[2]  Marie-Soleil Tremblay,et al.  Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises: Relevance for science and society and interdisciplinary research perspectives , 2015 .

[3]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Design principles for essentially digital governance , 2015 .

[4]  Edna Dias Canedo,et al.  Elements that Orient the Regulatory Compliance Verification Audits on ICT Governance , 2017, Digital Government Research.

[5]  L. Diamond.  IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .

[6]  S. Xia.  E-Governance and Political Modernization: An Empirical Study Based on Asia from 2003 to 2014 , 2017 .

[7]  Rogério Patricio Chagas do Nascimento,et al.  Public ICT Governance: A Quasi-systematic Review , 2017, ICEIS.

[8]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[9]  Luis Villanueva,et al.  THE NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE? EMERGING PERSPECTIVES ON THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF PUBLIC GOVERNANCE , 2015 .

[10]  José MATIAS-PEREIRA.  A GOVERNANÇA CORPORATIVA APLICADA NO SETOR PÚBLICO BRASILEIRO , 2010 .

[11]  Cláudio Márcio Campos de Mendonça,et al.  Governança de tecnologia da informação: um estudo do processo decisório em organizações públicas e privadas , 2013 .

[12]  Steven De Haes,et al.  Enterprise Governance of Information Technology , 2019, Management for Professionals.

[13]  Mauricio Solar,et al.  Correlation Between ICT Investment and Technological Maturity in Public Agencies , 2017, EGOV.

[14]  A. C. Fernando,et al.  Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies and Practices , 2009 .

[15]  Elaine Venson,et al.  Storytelling on the implementation of a Decentralized Model for Software Development in a Brazilian Government Body , 2016, DG.O.

[16]  Mukund Chaudhary,et al.  CMMI for Development , 2017 .

[17]  Mario Piattini,et al.  A Governance and Management Framework for Green IT , 2017 .

[18]  Maurice Yolles,et al.  Decoding the XXI Century's Marketing Shift: An Agency Theory Framework , 2016, Syst..

[19]  Bo Dahlbom.  The Digital Revolution , 2017 .