Students taking notes and creating summaries together (or not)

Two collaborative elearning projects using cloud-based productivity tools were undertaken in a large first-year common-core business information systems and technology unit at an Australian university. The first project involved collaborative synchronous and asynchronous note taking and the second project involved collaborative synchronous and asynchronous summarising of unit materials. Enrolment was optional and very low (less than 3 per cent of approximately 600 students) and active participation even lower (even with considerable support provided). Results seem to indicate students need strong motivation to actively participate (especially when lurking can provide seemingly similar results). Students who did actively participate suggest active participation is probably more useful than the collaboration and somewhat resented students lurking. Collaborative elearning offers many rewards for students, teachers, and organisations, and the technology is available to facilitate this, even in very large classes, but it seems significantly harder to achieve than anticipated.

[1]  James P. Cross,et al.  Cross-Cultural Perspectives of Knowledge Sharing for Different Virtual Classroom Environments: A Case Study of Thai Students in Thai and Australian Universities , 2008 .

[2]  Gregor Kennedy,et al.  Using wikis for collaborative learning: Assessing collaboration through contribution , 2010 .

[3]  Elena Novak,et al.  The educational use of social annotation tools in higher education: A literature review , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  Susan A. Brown Seeing Web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[5]  Doina Olaru,et al.  Behavioural Clusters in Online Learning , 2010 .

[6]  Oded Nov,et al.  What motivates Wikipedians? , 2007, CACM.

[7]  Alexandre Ardichvili,et al.  Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers , 2008 .

[8]  Max Mühlhäuser,et al.  Collaborative Paper-based Annotation of Lecture Slides , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[9]  G. Kennedy,et al.  Web 2.0 and user-created content: Students negotiating shifts in academic authority , 2008 .

[10]  David Lester Neumann,et al.  The Effects of Using a Wiki on Student Engagement and Learning of Report Writing Skills in a University Statistics Course. , 2009 .

[11]  Steve Wheeler,et al.  The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  Hamish Coates,et al.  A model of online and general campus‐based student engagement , 2007 .

[13]  David Jones,et al.  Indicators of engagement , 2010 .

[14]  Che-Jen Su,et al.  An Empirical Study on the Effect of Individual Factors on Knowledge Sharing by Knowledge Type , 2007 .