Implementation and validation of an implant-based coordinate system for RSA migration calculation.

An in vitro radiostereometric analysis (RSA) phantom study of a total knee replacement was carried out to evaluate the effect of implementing two new modifications to the conventional RSA procedure: (i) adding a landmark of the tibial component as an implant marker and (ii) defining an implant-based coordinate system constructed from implant landmarks for the calculation of migration results. The motivation for these two modifications were (i) to improve the representation of the implant by the markers by including the stem tip marker which increases the marker distribution (ii) to recover clinical RSA study cases with insufficient numbers of markers visible in the implant polyethylene and (iii) to eliminate errors in migration calculations due to misalignment of the anatomical axes with the RSA global coordinate system. The translational and rotational phantom studies showed no loss of accuracy with the two new measurement methods. The RSA system employing these methods has a precision of better than 0.05 mm for translations and 0.03 degrees for rotations, and an accuracy of 0.05 mm for translations and 0.15 degrees for rotations. These results indicate that the new methods to improve the interpretability, relevance, and standardization of the results do not compromise precision and accuracy, and are suitable for application to clinical data.

[1]  Aivars Berzins,et al.  Accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in the measurement of THR femoral component translations: human and canine in vitro models , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  Xunhua Yuan,et al.  Comparison of two digital radiostereometric analysis methods in the determination of femoral head penetration in a total hip replacement phantom , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  L Ryd,et al.  Digital automated RSA compared to manually operated RSA. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Evaluation of micromotion in cemented vs uncemented knee arthroplasty in osteoarthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Randomized study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. , 1991, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  P. Herberts,et al.  The effect of a stem on the tibial component of knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of uncemented tibial components in the Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  The use of Roentgen stereophotogrammetry to study micromotion of orthopaedic implants , 2002 .

[7]  C. Spoor,et al.  Model-based RSA of a Femoral Hip Stem Using Surface and Geometrical Shape Models , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Niclas Börlin,et al.  Experimental assessment of precision and accuracy of radiostereometric analysis for the determination of polyethylene wear in a total hip replacement model , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  L Ryd,et al.  Migration of the tibial component in successful unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A clinical, radiographic and roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. , 1983, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[10]  L Ryd,et al.  Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. , 1999, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  E R Valstar,et al.  Model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetry of orthopaedic implants. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  D W Murray,et al.  Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis for Assessing Migration of Total Hip Replacement Femoral Components , 1995, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[13]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[14]  Niclas Börlin,et al.  Validation of a low-dose hybrid RSA and fluoroscopy technique: Determination of accuracy, bias and precision. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  B. Stoel,et al.  Clinical Validation of Model-based RSA for a Total Knee Prosthesis , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  E R Valstar,et al.  A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Gunnar Flivik,et al.  Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[19]  J. Challis A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  L Ryd,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of prosthetic fixation in the hip and knee joint. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[22]  HighWire Press,et al.  The journal of bone and joint surgery - British volume , 1948 .

[23]  H. Aro,et al.  Accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in the measurement of three‐dimensional micromotion in a fracture model of the distal radius , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  G. Selvik Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[25]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.