Academic database systems are vitally important tools for enabling researchers to find relevant, useful articles. Identifying how researchers select documents from search results is an extremely useful measure for improving the functions or interfaces of academic retrieval systems. This study aims to reveal which elements are checked, and in what order, when researchers select from among search results. It consists of two steps: an observational study of search sessions performed by researchers who volunteered, and a questionnaire to confirm whether extracted elements and patterns are used. This article reports findings from the observational study and introduces questions we developed based on the study. In the observational study we obtained data on nine participants who were asked to search for documents using information retrieval systems. The search sessions were recorded using a voice recorder and by capturing screen images. The participants were also asked to state which elements they checked in selecting documents, along with the reasons for their selections. Three patterns of order of checking were found. In pattern 1, seven researchers used titles and abstracts as the primary elements. In pattern 2, the others used titles and then accessed the full text before making a decision on their selection. In pattern 3, one participant searched for images and accessed the full text from the link in those pictures. We also found participants used novel elements for selecting. We subsequently developed items for a questionnaire reflecting the findings.
[1]
Ann Blandford,et al.
From physical to digital: a case study of computer scientists’ behaviour in physical libraries
,
2003,
International Journal on Digital Libraries.
[2]
Yoichi Tomiura,et al.
An Experiment to Identify How Researchers Select Documents from Search Results
,
2015
.
[3]
Iris Xie,et al.
Search result list evaluation versus document evaluation: similarities and differences
,
2013,
J. Documentation.
[4]
Dejan Pajic,et al.
Browse to search, visualize to explore: Who needs an alternative information retrieving model?
,
2014,
Comput. Hum. Behav..
[5]
Hamid R. Jamali,et al.
The Use, Users, and Role of Abstracts in the Digital Scholarly Environment
,
2007
.
[6]
Christine Ros,et al.
How do scientists select articles in the PubMed database? An empirical study of criteria and strategies
,
2012
.
[7]
Peiling Wang,et al.
A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. document selection
,
1998
.
[8]
Frank M. Shipman,et al.
Patterns of reading and organizing information in document triage
,
2007,
ASIST.
[9]
A. Noorhidawati,et al.
How graduate students seek for information: Convenience or guaranteed result?
,
2014
.