STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation.

[1]  Bruce Budowle,et al.  NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[2]  John M Butler,et al.  NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX05 and MIX13): Variation observed and lessons learned. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  P A Barrio,et al.  GHEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mixture profiles (GHEP-MIX06). Reporting conclusions: Results and evaluation. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  Duncan A. Taylor,et al.  A sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of STRmix™ with respect to laboratory calibration. , 2018, Forensic Science International: Genetics.

[5]  Duncan A. Taylor,et al.  Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[6]  Catherine M. Grgicak,et al.  A large-scale dataset of single and mixed-source short tandem repeat profiles to inform human identification strategies: PROVEDIt. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[7]  C Champod,et al.  Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US-A commentary on the PCAST report. , 2017, Forensic science international.

[8]  Jo-Anne Bright,et al.  Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. , 2017, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[9]  Jo-Anne Bright,et al.  Population data on the expanded CODIS core STR loci for eleven populations of significance for forensic DNA analyses in the United States. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[10]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[11]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Investigating a common approach to DNA profile interpretation using probabilistic software. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[12]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  A series of recommended tests when validating probabilistic DNA profile interpretation software. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  Jo-Anne Bright,et al.  The variability in likelihood ratios due to different mechanisms. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[14]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Interpreting forensic DNA profiling evidence without specifying the number of contributors. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[15]  Jo-Anne Bright,et al.  The effect of the uncertainty in the number of contributors to mixed DNA profiles on profile interpretation. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[16]  P Gill,et al.  Euroforgen-NoE collaborative exercise on LRmix to demonstrate standardization of the interpretation of complex DNA profiles. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[17]  James Curran,et al.  Searching mixed DNA profiles directly against profile databases. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[18]  L. Calandro,et al.  Principles, Practice, and Evolution of Capillary Electrophoresis as a Tool for Forensic DNA Analysis. , 2012, Forensic science review.