Holistic approach to machine tool data analytics

Abstract Recent developments across all phases of the knowledge discovery process in the machine tool data analytics process call for a paradigm shift regarding how to combine the different analytics objectives. Several machine tool data analytics processes are carried out individually by different departments. They are highly dependent on the specific analytics objectives of the individual department. All these individual tasks make use of the data coming from the same source – the machine tool controller and connected sensors. One result of today’s rather diverse machine tool data analytics landscape in many manufacturing companies is that we exhibit several pockets of expertise and large numbers of individual dedicated solutions. Hence, processes and structures tend be inefficient, e.g., exhibit redundant processes, and the exchange between the different domains is difficult. Manufacturers face heavy competition for manufacturing experts, interested and qualified in data analytics. Therefore, it is in their best interest to utilizing this scarce resource as efficiently and effectively as possible. In this paper, we discuss the current situation exhibited in machine tool data analytics in manufacturing. Based on these insights, we propose a holistic approach to machine tool data analytics in order to tackle some of the identified shortcomings of current practices. We propose combining the tasks and bundling up analytics objectives across different departments and/or functions at the production line, factory or even the supply chain level. To evaluate our proposed approach, we provide selected implementation examples following the identified analytics objectives, including cross-domain analytics that focus on the interface between domains. Following, we critically discuss our proposed approach focused on the associated potential benefits, challenges and limitations. Lastly, we conclude the paper and provide an outlook on further research.

[1]  Andres F. Clarens,et al.  A Review of Engineering Research in Sustainable Manufacturing , 2013 .

[2]  Volker Stich,et al.  Big data implementation for the reaction management in manufacturing systems , 2015, 2015 XXV International Conference on Information, Communication and Automation Technologies (ICAT).

[3]  Klaus-Dieter Thoben,et al.  "Industrie 4.0" and Smart Manufacturing - A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples , 2017, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[4]  Sami Kara,et al.  Towards Energy and Resource Efficient Manufacturing: A Processes and Systems Approach , 2012 .

[5]  Dazhong Wu,et al.  A fog computing-based framework for process monitoring and prognosis in cyber-manufacturing , 2017 .

[6]  Jin Wang,et al.  Statistical process monitoring as a big data analytics tool for smart manufacturing , 2017, Journal of Process Control.

[7]  Jin Cui,et al.  Multi-bearing remaining useful life collaborative prediction: A deep learning approach , 2017 .

[8]  Hannu Kärkkäinen,et al.  Role of Openness in Industrial Internet Platform Providers' Strategy , 2017, PLM.

[9]  Jin Jiang,et al.  Erratum to: State-of-the-art methods and results in tool condition monitoring: a review , 2005 .

[10]  Soundar R. T. Kumara,et al.  Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing , 2016 .

[11]  David Romero,et al.  Smart manufacturing: Characteristics, technologies and enabling factors , 2019 .

[12]  Juergen Lenz,et al.  Wear Prediction of Woodworking Cutting Tools based on History Data , 2017 .

[13]  Yingfeng Zhang,et al.  A big data analytics architecture for cleaner manufacturing and maintenance processes of complex products , 2017 .

[14]  Fernando Deschamps,et al.  Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[15]  David Dornfeld,et al.  Energy Consumption Characterization and Reduction Strategies for Milling Machine Tool Use , 2011 .

[16]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Smart manufacturing must embrace big data , 2017, Nature.

[17]  Lihui Wang,et al.  Big Data Analytics for Scheduling and Machining , 2018 .

[18]  R. Keith Mobley,et al.  An introduction to predictive maintenance , 1989 .

[19]  Lihui Wang,et al.  Condition monitoring and control for intelligent manufacturing , 2006 .

[20]  Juergen Lenz,et al.  Energy Efficiency in Machine Tool Operation by Online Energy Monitoring Capturing and Analysis , 2017 .

[21]  Allison Barnard Feeney,et al.  Reference architecture to integrate heterogeneous manufacturing systems for the digital thread. , 2017, CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology.

[22]  Peter Butala,et al.  Interpretative identification of the faulty conditions in a cyclic manufacturing process , 2017 .

[23]  Alain Bernard,et al.  Accessing enterprise knowledge: A context-based approach , 2016 .

[24]  Ying Wah Teh,et al.  Big data reduction framework for value creation in sustainable enterprises , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[25]  Stephen C.-Y. Lu,et al.  Machine learning approaches to knowledge synthesis and integration tasks for advanced engineering , 1990 .

[26]  Andrea Matta,et al.  Energy Efficient Control Strategy for Machine Tools with Stochastic Arrivals and Time Dependent Warm-up , 2014 .

[27]  Athulan Vijayaraghavan,et al.  Automated energy monitoring of machine tools , 2010 .

[28]  Jim Davis,et al.  Cybersecurity for Manufacturers: Securing the Digitized and Connected Factory , 2017 .

[29]  Jaap Schaveling,et al.  The Value Creation Model , 2018 .

[30]  Hyunbo Cho,et al.  NIST/OAGi Workshop: Drilling down on Smart Manufacturing Enabling Composable Apps , 2017 .

[31]  Anders Skoogh,et al.  Data quality problems in discrete event simulation of manufacturing operations , 2018, Simul..

[32]  Axel Tuma,et al.  Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Sami Kara,et al.  Methodology for Monitoring Manufacturing Environment by Using Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and the Internet of Things (IoT) , 2017 .

[34]  Makoto Fujishima,et al.  A study on energy efficiency improvement for machine tools , 2011 .

[35]  J. Banks,et al.  Cost Benefit Analysis for Asset Health Management Technology , 2007, 2007 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[36]  Remzi Seker,et al.  Big Data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: A survey of the current status and future outlook , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[37]  Armando Fox,et al.  Improving Machine Tool Interoperability Using Standardized Interface Protocols: MT Connect , 2008 .

[38]  David C. Chou,et al.  Cloud computing: A value creation model , 2015, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[39]  Sangkee Min,et al.  Development of an energy consumption monitoring procedure for machine tools , 2012 .

[40]  A. Davies,et al.  Handbook of Condition Monitoring , 1998 .

[41]  Klaus-Dieter Thoben,et al.  Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications , 2016 .

[42]  Ichiro Inasaki,et al.  Tool Condition Monitoring (TCM) — The Status of Research and Industrial Application , 1995 .

[43]  Justinian Rosca,et al.  Manufacturing apps and the Dynamic House of Quality: Towards an industrial revolution , 2017 .

[44]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[45]  Ray Y. Zhong,et al.  Big Data Analytics for Physical Internet-based intelligent manufacturing shop floors , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[46]  Christian Brecher,et al.  Industrial Internet of Things and Cyber Manufacturing Systems , 2017 .

[47]  I. S. Jawahir,et al.  Model-based Approach for Assessing Value Creation to Enhance Sustainability in Manufacturing , 2014 .