Social Consumer Neuroscience: Neurophysiological Measures of Advertising Effectiveness in a Social Context

The application of neurophysiological methods to study the effects of advertising on consumer purchase behavior has seen an enormous growth in recent years. However, little is known about the role social settings have on shaping the human brain during the processing of advertising stimuli. To address this issue, we first review previous key findings of neuroscience research on advertising effectiveness. Next, we discuss traditional advertising research into the effects social context has on the way consumers experience advertising messages and explain why marketers, who aim to predict advertising effectiveness, should place participants in social settings, in addition to the traditional ways of studying consumer brain responses to advertising in social isolation. This article contributes to the literature by offering advertising researchers a series of research agendas on the key indicators of advertising effectiveness (attention, emotion, memory, and preference). It aims to improve understanding of the impact social context has on consumers' neurophysiological responses to advertising messages.

[1]  José-Domingo Mora Social context and advertising effectiveness: a dynamic study , 2016 .

[2]  Steven Tompson,et al.  Functional brain imaging predicts public health campaign success. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[3]  F. Paulus,et al.  Mentalizing and the Role of the Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus in Sharing Others' Embarrassment. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  William H. Hampton,et al.  Predicting Advertising success beyond Traditional Measures: New Insights from Neurophysiological Methods and Market Response Modeling , 2015 .

[5]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Merely Being with you Increases My Attention to Luxury Products: Using EEG to Understand Consumers’ Emotional Experience with Luxury Branded Products , 2015 .

[6]  Ariel Telpaz,et al.  Using EEG to Predict Consumers’ Future Choices , 2015 .

[7]  S. C. Boerman,et al.  Using Eye Tracking to Understand the Effects of Brand Placement Disclosure Types in Television Programs , 2015 .

[8]  S. C. Boerman,et al.  The Power of Direct Context As Revealed by Eye Tracking , 2015, Journal of Advertising Research.

[9]  Edith G. Smit,et al.  提携研究機関誌からの論文紹介 The Advertising Research Foundation 『Journal of Advertising Research』より The Power of Direct Context As Revealed by Eye Tracking : A Model Tracks Relative Attention To Competing Editorial and Promotional Content , 2015 .

[10]  K. Kasai,et al.  The future of real-world neuroscience: Imaging techniques to assess active brains in social environments , 2015, Neuroscience Research.

[11]  Sylvia A. Morelli,et al.  The neural bases of feeling understood and not understood. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[12]  E. Fehr,et al.  The neurobiology of rewards and values in social decision making , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  John S. Johnson,et al.  Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing , 2014, Nature Communications.

[14]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  “I am resting but rest less well with you.” The moderating effect of anxious attachment style on alpha power during EEG resting state in a social context , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  L. Astolfi,et al.  Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: Past, present and future , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[16]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect , 2013 .

[17]  Tomer Bakalash,et al.  Exploring Ad-Elicited Emotional Arousal and Memory for the Ad Using fMRI , 2013 .

[18]  Joseph W. Kable,et al.  The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value , 2013, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Ritson,et al.  Everyday Advertising Context: An Ethnography of Advertising Response in the Family Living Room , 2013 .

[20]  S. Puntoni,et al.  Advertising-Induced Embarrassment , 2013 .

[21]  W. Klimesch Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  P. Neijens,et al.  Program-Involvement Effects on commercial Attention and Recall of Successive and Embedded Advertising , 2012 .

[23]  Emily B. Falk,et al.  From Neural Responses to Population Behavior , 2012, Psychological science.

[24]  L. Parra,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Correlated Components of Ongoing Eeg Point to Emotionally Laden Attention – a Possible Marker of Engagement? , 2022 .

[25]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice , 2012 .

[26]  S. Garrod,et al.  Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  How coviewing reduces the effectiveness of TV advertising , 2012 .

[28]  Yadin Dudai,et al.  Following the Crowd: Brain Substrates of Long-Term Memory Conformity , 2011, Science.

[29]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Social Influence Modulates the Neural Computation of Value , 2011, Psychological science.

[30]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Spectral EEG frontal asymmetries correlate with the experienced pleasantness of TV commercial advertisements , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[31]  Jakob Heinzle,et al.  Flow of affective information between communicating brains , 2011, NeuroImage.

[32]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  The Influence of Friends on Consumer Spending: The Role of Agency–Communion Orientation and Self-Monitoring , 2010 .

[33]  R. Dolan,et al.  How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects , 2010, Current Biology.

[34]  O. Jensen,et al.  Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  Joseph C. Nunes,et al.  Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence , 2010 .

[36]  D. Ariely,et al.  Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  D. Dwyer,et al.  Being liked activates primary reward and midline self‐related brain regions , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[38]  F. Cincotti,et al.  Changes in Brain Activity During the Observation of TV Commercials by Using EEG, GSR and HR Measurements , 2010, Brain Topography.

[39]  Kosha Ruparel,et al.  Reduced prefrontal and temporal processing and recall of high “sensation value” ads , 2009, NeuroImage.

[40]  Steven J. Stanton,et al.  Endogenous testosterone levels are associated with amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex responses to anger faces in men but not women , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[41]  R. Hari,et al.  Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. , 2009, Physiological reviews.

[42]  Nelson J Klahr,et al.  Mapping a multidimensional emotion in response to television commercials , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[43]  P. Kenning,et al.  What they see is what they get? An fMRI‐study on neural correlates of attractive packaging , 2008 .

[44]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  Taking Another Person's Perspective Increases Self-Referential Neural Processing , 2008, Psychological science.

[45]  N. Sadato,et al.  Processing of Social and Monetary Rewards in the Human Striatum , 2008, Neuron.

[46]  Richard B. Silberstein,et al.  Brain activity correlates of consumer brand choice shift associated with television advertising , 2008 .

[47]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Self-conscious emotions: Embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt. , 2008 .

[48]  R. Pieters,et al.  A Review of Eye-Tracking Research in Marketing , 2008 .

[49]  K. Fliessbach,et al.  Social Comparison Affects Reward-Related Brain Activity in the Human Ventral Striatum , 2007, Science.

[50]  F. Cincotti,et al.  High Resolution EEG Hyperscanning During a Card Game , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[51]  R. Terlutter,et al.  Consumers' response to offensive advertising: a cross cultural study , 2007 .

[52]  A. Tamhane,et al.  The Effects of Media Context Experiences On Advertising Effectiveness , 2007 .

[53]  R. Pieters,et al.  Goal Control of Attention to Advertising: The Yarbus Implication , 2007 .

[54]  J. Kelso,et al.  From the Cover : The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination , 2007 .

[55]  Stefano Puntoni,et al.  Social Context and Advertising Memory , 2007 .

[56]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Neural Predictors of Purchases , 2007, Neuron.

[57]  Tim Ambler,et al.  What can advertisers learn from neuroscience? , 2007 .

[58]  Petter Johansson,et al.  How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[59]  Rajagopal Raghunathan,et al.  Is Happiness Shared Doubled and Sadness Shared Halved? Social Influence on Enjoyment of Hedonic Experiences , 2006 .

[60]  Georg Northoff,et al.  Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self , 2006, NeuroImage.

[61]  K. Poels,et al.  How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing 20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising , 2006 .

[62]  C. Neil Macrae,et al.  The Link between Social Cognition and Self-referential Thought in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  A. Herrmann,et al.  The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs , 2005 .

[64]  S. Quartz,et al.  Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange , 2005, Science.

[65]  R. Fisher,et al.  Gender Differences in Responses to Emotional Advertising: A Social Desirability Perspective , 2005 .

[66]  Tetsuya Matsuda,et al.  Brain activation associated with evaluative processes of guilt and embarrassment: an fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[67]  R. Davidson What does the prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[68]  Alan Gevins,et al.  Attention and Brain Activity While Watching Television: Components of Viewer Engagement , 2004 .

[69]  Rik Pieters,et al.  Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects , 2004 .

[70]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[71]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[72]  Sriram Kalyanaraman,et al.  AROUSAL, MEMORY, AND IMPRESSION-FORMATION EFFECTS OF ANIMATION SPEED IN WEB ADVERTISING , 2004 .

[73]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Exploring the role of self- and customer-provoked embarrassment in personal selling , 2003 .

[74]  Maggie Geuens,et al.  Media Context and Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Context Appreciation and Context/Ad Similarity , 2002 .

[75]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity , 2001 .

[76]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  Memory-Based Measures for Assessing Advertising Effects: A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Memory Effects , 2001 .

[77]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  Brain-Imaging Detection of Visual Scene Encoding in Long-term Memory for TV Commercials , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[78]  V. Mittal,et al.  Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics , 2001 .

[79]  D. Ariely,et al.  Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed , 2000 .

[80]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings , 2000 .

[81]  Gerald Zaltman,et al.  Consumer Researchers: Take a Hike! , 2000 .

[82]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual Attention to Repeated Print Advertising: A Test of Scanpath Theory , 1999 .

[83]  Scot Burton,et al.  Exposure to sales flyers and increased purchases in retail supermarkets , 1999 .

[84]  Richard L. Hazlett,et al.  Emotional response to television commercials: Facial EMG vs. self-report , 1999 .

[85]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Wouldn't it be nice? Predicting future feelings. , 1999 .

[86]  Rowland S. Miller Embarrassment: Poise and Peril in Everyday Life , 1996 .

[87]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Brand Equity, Brand Preference, and Purchase Intent , 1995 .

[88]  R. Fisher Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning , 1993 .

[89]  Michael A. Kamins,et al.  Two-Sided versus One-Sided Celebrity Endorsements: The Impact on Advertising Effectiveness and Credibility , 1989 .

[90]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Hemispherically Lateralized EEG as a Response to Television Commercials , 1988 .

[91]  R. Goldstein,et al.  EEG ACTIVITY AND THE PROCESSING OF TELEVISION COMMERCIALS , 1986 .

[92]  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  Television and the Rest of Life: A Systematic Comparison of Subjective Experience , 1981 .

[93]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .