Comparison of 3D-OP-OSEM and 3D-FBP reconstruction algorithms for High-Resolution Research Tomograph studies: effects of randoms estimation methods

The High-Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) is a dedicated human brain positron emission tomography (PET) scanner. Recently, a 3D filtered backprojection (3D-FBP) reconstruction method has been implemented to reduce bias in short duration frames, currently observed in 3D ordinary Poisson OSEM (3D-OP-OSEM) reconstructions. Further improvements might be expected using a new method of variance reduction on randoms (VRR) based on coincidence histograms instead of using the delayed window technique (DW) to estimate randoms. The goal of this study was to evaluate VRR in combination with 3D-OP-OSEM and 3D-FBP reconstruction techniques. To this end, several phantom studies and a human brain study were performed. For most phantom studies, 3D-OP-OSEM showed higher accuracy of observed activity concentrations with VRR than with DW. However, both positive and negative deviations in reconstructed activity concentrations and large biases of grey to white matter contrast ratio (up to 88%) were still observed as a function of scan statistics. Moreover 3D-OP-OSEM+VRR also showed bias up to 64% in clinical data, i.e. in some pharmacokinetic parameters as compared with those obtained with 3D-FBP+VRR. In the case of 3D-FBP, VRR showed similar results as DW for both phantom and clinical data, except that VRR showed a better standard deviation of 6-10%. Therefore, VRR should be used to correct for randoms in HRRT PET studies.

[1]  R D Badawi,et al.  Randoms variance reduction in 3D PET. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Variance Reduction on Randoms from delayed coincidence histograms for the HRRT , 2005 .

[3]  C. Comtat,et al.  OSEM-3D reconstruction strategies for the ECAT HRRT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[4]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Variance reduction on randoms from coincidence histograms for the HRRT , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[5]  J. Logan Graphical analysis of PET data applied to reversible and irreversible tracers. , 1999, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[6]  M. Teras,et al.  Quantitative brain imaging using the new, fast iterative histogram-mode reconstruction for the HRRT PET scanner , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[7]  E. Hoffman,et al.  3-D phantom to simulate cerebral blood flow and metabolic images for PET , 1990 .

[8]  N. Volkow,et al.  Distribution Volume Ratios without Blood Sampling from Graphical Analysis of PET Data , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[9]  H.W.A.M. de Jong,et al.  Quantitative Experimental Comparison of HRRT versus HR+ PET Brain Studies , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[10]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Characteristics of a new fully programmable blood sampling device for monitoring blood radioactivity during PET , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[12]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Evaluation of Basis Function and Linear Least Squares Methods for Generating Parametric Blood Flow Images Using 15O-Water and Positron Emission Tomography , 2005, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[13]  Vincent J. Cunningham,et al.  Parametric Imaging of Ligand-Receptor Binding in PET Using a Simplified Reference Region Model , 1997, NeuroImage.

[14]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Optimization algorithms and weighting factors for analysis of dynamic PET studies , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 4. Effect of Accidental Coincidences , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  G Muehllehner,et al.  Constrained Fourier space method for compensation of missing data in emission computed tomography. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[18]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  A study of bias for various iterative reconstruction methods in PET , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[19]  Gert Luurtsema,et al.  Optimizing an online SPE-HPLC method for analysis of (R)-[11C]1-(2-chlorophenyl)-N-methyl-N-(1-methylpropyl)-3-isoquinolinecarboxamide [(R)-[11C]PK11195] and its metabolites in humans. , 2005, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[20]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Simplified Reference Tissue Model for PET Receptor Studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  Floris H. P. van Velden,et al.  Gap Filling Strategies for 3-D-FBP Reconstructions of High-Resolution Research Tomograph Scans , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  PPET: A software tool for kinetic and parametric analyses of dynamic PET studies , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high resolution research tomograph , 2000 .

[24]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[26]  Z. H. Cho,et al.  Ultra Fast Symmetry and SIMD-Based Projection-Backprojection (SSP) Algorithm for 3-D PET Image Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.