Effects of the Periodic Administration of Odor or Vibration on a 3-hr. Vigilance Task

The present study examined performance during 3 hr. of simulated sentry duty with and without the intermittent administration of low-level sensory stimuli (odor or vibration). For odor and control conditions, target-detection latency increased steadily over the course of the 3-hr. session. Administration of a tactile stimulus reduced the increase in detection latency compared to that found in odor and control conditions. For all conditions, there were no significant differences in target-detection frequency, shot accuracy, or friend–foe discrimination. Across all conditions, restlessness (motor activity) increased significantly the first hour and remained elevated for the rest of the session. Subjective measures of workload (NASA-TLX) indicated that the 3-hr. task rated high on physical demand, mental demand, frustration, and overall workload. These findings suggest that the intermittent delivery of a clearly detectable tactile stimulus can reduce reaction-time decrements that occur as time on task increases.

[1]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  A Whiff of Reality: Empirical Evidence Concerning the Effects of Pleasant Fragrances on Work‐Related Behavior1 , 1994 .

[2]  Richard F. Johnson,et al.  Friend-Foe Discrimination, Caffeine, and Sentry Duty , 1999 .

[3]  E C Poulton.  Increased vigilance with vertical vibration at 5 Hz: an alerting mechanism. , 1978, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation Technology and Human Performance: Current Research and Trends , 1999 .

[5]  William N. Dember,et al.  VIGILANCE AND WORKLOAD IN AUTOMATED SYSTEMS. , 1996 .

[6]  S M Soliday,et al.  Pilot and Observer Performance in Simulated Low Altitude High Speed Flight , 1965, Human factors.

[7]  Susan G. Hill,et al.  Workload Assessment of a Remotely Piloted Vehicle (RPV) System , 1988 .

[8]  J. Lecomte.  [The common chemical sense]. , 1963, Revue medicale de Liege.

[9]  R. Baron,et al.  Effects of a Pleasant Ambient Fragrance on Simulated Driving Performance: The Sweet Smell of … Safety? , 1996 .

[10]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation and Human Performance : Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[11]  Donna J. Merullo,et al.  Effects of Caffeine and Gender on Vigilance and Marksmanship , 1996 .

[12]  C. Wickens,et al.  Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance. , 1993 .

[13]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[14]  Richard F. Johnson,et al.  Target Detection, Rifle Marksmanship, and Mood during Three Hours of Simulated Sentry Duty , 1989 .

[15]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Effects of olfactory stimulation on performance and stress in a visual sustained attention task , 1991 .

[16]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Effects of a Pleasant Ambient Fragrance on Simulated Driving Performance , 1998 .

[17]  G. Neil Martin,et al.  'A good odour to breathe?' The effect of pleasant ambient odour on human visual vigilance , 2001 .

[18]  Richard F. Johnson.  Statistical Measures of Marksmanship , 2001 .

[19]  Richard F. Johnson,et al.  Antihistamines and Sentry Duty: Effects of Terfenadine and Diphenhydramine on Target Detection and Rifle Markmanship , 1987 .

[20]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Psychophysical Determinants of Stress in Sustained Attention , 1993, Human factors.