The Different Role of Working Memory in Open-Ended Versus Closed-Ended Creative Problem Solving: A Dual-Process Theory Account

This study examined how working memory plays different roles in open-ended versus closed-ended creative problem-solving processes, as represented by divergent thinking tests and insight problem-solving tasks. With respect to the analysis of different task demands and the framework of dual-process theories, the hypothesis was that the idea generation in a divergent thinking test relies more on associative, effortless system 1 processing, but insight problem solving requires rule-based, resource-limited system 2 processing, in addition to system 1 processing. Since system 1 was suggested to be more active in resource deprivation conditions, Experiment 1 adopted the dual-task paradigm, which increased participants' working memory load. The results showed that divergent thinking performance was enhanced and insight problem-solving performance was hindered. Experiment 2 using the individual differences approach found that individuals' working memory capacity correlated with insight problem solving but not with divergent thinking performance, indicating a possible involvement of system 2 processing in insight problem solving. These findings suggested that open-ended and closed-ended creative problem solving involve different processes and helped to clarify some past inconsistencies when considering the relationship of factors with creativity.

[1]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  The nature of restructuring in insight: An individual-differences approach , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  FEATURED ARTICLE: The Creative Process in Picasso's Guernica Sketches: Monotonic Improvements versus Nonmonotonic Variants , 2007 .

[3]  P. Wason.  On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task , 1960 .

[4]  C. Martindale.  Creativity and connectionism. , 1995 .

[5]  M. Chi.  Creativity: Shifting across ontological categories flexibly. , 1997 .

[6]  Dean Keith Simonton.  Psychology of science: Chance-configuration theory of scientific creativity , 1989 .

[7]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[8]  Joseph Kasof,et al.  Creativity and Breadth of Attention , 1997 .

[9]  William C. Ward,et al.  Creativity and environmental cues in nursery school children. , 1969 .

[10]  David D. Tukey.  A Philosophical and Empirical Analysis of Subjects’ Modes of Inquiry in Wason's 2–4–6 Task , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[11]  David Rawlings,et al.  Psychoticism, creativity and dichotic shadowing , 1985 .

[12]  R. Logie,et al.  Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[13]  L. Vandervert,et al.  How Working Memory and the Cerebellum Collaborate to Produce Creativity and Innovation , 2007 .

[14]  Dennis R. Brophy.  Understanding, Measuring, and Enhancing Individual Creative Problem-Solving Efforts , 1998 .

[15]  Geir Kaufmann,et al.  Expanding the Mood-Creativity Equation , 2003 .

[16]  Kevin M. Brooks,et al.  Thoughts beyond words : When language overshadows insight , 1993 .

[17]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A Resource Account of Inhibition , 1995 .

[18]  S. Ohlsson.  Restructuring revisited: II. An information processing theory of restructuring and insight. , 1984 .

[19]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  E. Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[21]  D. Perkins.  In the Country of the Blind An Appreciation of Donald Campbell's Vision of Creative Thought , 1998 .

[22]  J. Glover,et al.  Handbook of creativity. , 1989 .

[23]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving , 1999 .

[24]  Yunn-Wen Lien,et al.  From falsification to generating an alternative hypothesis: Exploring the role of the new-perspective hypothesis in successful 2-4-6 task performance , 2011 .

[25]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  D. Campbell.  Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. , 1960, Psychological review.

[27]  Russell A. Matthews,et al.  The relationships of working memory, secondary memory, and general fluid intelligence: working memory is special. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  J. Tippin,et al.  Depression in multiple sclerosis: relationship to working memory capacity. , 1999 .

[29]  A. Mcghie,et al.  A Comparative Study of Attentional Strategies of Schizophrenic and Highly Creative Normal Subjects , 1976, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[30]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[31]  Paul H. Blaney,et al.  The Effects of Musical Mood Induction on Creativity. , 1995 .

[32]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Problem Solving , 1967, Nature.

[33]  K. Gilhooly,et al.  Differentiating insight from non-insight problems , 2005 .

[34]  Jonathan Evans.  Hypothetical Thinking: Dual Processes in Reasoning and Judgement , 2007 .

[35]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[36]  D. Simonton.  Darwin as Straw Man: Dasgupta's (2004) Evaluation of Creativity as a Darwinian Process , 2005 .

[37]  Colin G. DeYoung,et al.  Cognitive Abilities Involved in Insight Problem Solving: An Individual Differences Model , 2008 .

[38]  M. Runco.  Creativity: Theories and Themes: Research, Development, and Practice , 2006 .

[39]  John F. Wakefield.  Creativity and cognition some implications for arts education , 1989 .

[40]  D. Gilbert,et al.  On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. , 1988 .

[41]  Robert W. Weisberg,et al.  COMMENTARIES: We Are All Partly Right: Comment on Simonton , 2007 .

[42]  Ryan D. Tweney,et al.  Strategies of Rule Discovery in an Inference Task , 1980 .

[43]  Jessica I. Fleck,et al.  Working memory demands in insight versus analytic problem solving , 2008 .

[44]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[45]  J. Guilford.  The structure of intellect. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning , 2005 .

[47]  N. Chater,et al.  Another look at eliminative and enumerative behaviour in a conceptual task , 1994 .

[48]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A model of heuristic judgment , 2005 .

[49]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Cognition: An Introduction , 1973 .

[50]  Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity-Intelligence Distinction. , 1966 .

[51]  HU Min-zhong,et al.  On Creative Cognition , 2005 .

[52]  L. Gabora.  Revenge of the “Neurds”: Characterizing Creative Thought in Terms of the Structure and Dynamics of Memory , 2010, 1308.5037.

[53]  R. Sternberg.  Enhancing Creativity , 2022, Creativity.

[54]  Jonathan Evans.  In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Robert W. Weisberg,et al.  Case studies of creative thinking: Reproduction versus restructuring in the real world. , 1995 .

[56]  P. Wason.  >On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses...< – A Second Look , 1968 .

[57]  C. Martindale,et al.  Creativity and Inductive Reasoning: The Relationship between Divergent Thinking and Performance on Wason's 2—4—6 Task , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[58]  E. Torrance.  The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. , 1988 .