An analysis of sentiments on facebook during the 2016 U.S. presidential election

Social networking sites (SNS), such as Facebook and Twitter, are important spaces for political engagement. SNS have become common elements in political participation, campaigns, and elections. However, little is known about the dynamics between candidate posts and commentator sentiment in response to those posts on SNS. This study enriches computational political science by studying the 2016 U.S. elections and how candidates and commentators engage on Facebook. This paper also examines how online activity might be connected to offline activity and vice versa. We extracted 9,700 Facebook posts by five presidential candidates (Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, Ted Cruz, and John Kasich) from their official Facebook pages and 12,050,595 comments on those posts. We employed topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and trends detection using wavelet transforms to discover topics, trends, and reactions. Our findings suggest that Republican candidates are more likely to share information on controversial events that have taken place during the election cycle, while Democratic candidates focus on social policy issues. As expected, commentators on Republican candidate pages express negative sentiments toward current public policies as they seldom support decisions made by the Obama administration, while commentators on democratic candidate pages are more likely to express support for continuation or advancement of existing policies. However, the significance (strong/weak) and nature (positive/negative) of sentiments varied between candidates within political parties based on perceived credibility of the candidate's degree of credibility on a given issue. Additionally, we explored correlation between online trends of comments/sentiment and offline events. When analyzing the trend patterns, we found that changes in online trends are driven by three factors: 1) popular post, 2) offline debates, and 3) candidates dropping out of the race.

[1]  B. Wellman.  An electronic group is virtually a social network. , 1997 .

[2]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Community Networks: Where Offline Communities Meet Online , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. presidential election , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[4]  P. Howard,et al.  Opening Closed Regimes: What Was the Role of Social Media During the Arab Spring? , 2011 .

[5]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series , 2010, ICWSM.

[6]  Petr Sojka,et al.  Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora , 2010 .

[7]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement , 2011, Commun. Res..

[8]  Juliet E. Carlisle,et al.  Is Social Media Changing How We Understand Political Engagement? An Analysis of Facebook and the 2008 Presidential Election , 2013 .

[9]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections , 2013, New Media Soc..

[10]  W. Bennett,et al.  The Personalization of Politics , 2012 .

[11]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[12]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  What is a Social Network Worth? Facebook and Vote Share in the 2008 Presidential Primaries , 2008 .

[13]  Robert L. Bertini,et al.  OBSERVATIONS AT A FREEWAY BOTTLENECK , 1999 .

[14]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank , 2013, EMNLP.

[15]  Sounman Hong,et al.  Which candidates do the public discuss online in an election campaign?: The use of social media by 2012 presidential candidates and its impact on candidate salience , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  Digital government , 2010, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  P. Metaxas,et al.  Social Media and the Elections , 2012, Science.

[18]  R. Gibson,et al.  Does Cyber‐Campaigning Win Votes? Online Communication in the 2004 Australian Election , 2005 .

[19]  G. Enli,et al.  PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS , 2013 .

[20]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[21]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? , 2011, ePart.

[22]  C. Williams,et al.  Facebook Grows Up: An Empirical Assessment of its Role in the 2008 Congressional Elections , 2009 .

[23]  M. Cassidy,et al.  Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks , 1999 .

[24]  Srinivasa Srivatsav Kandala,et al.  Analysis of Freeway Bottlenecks , 2014 .