Improved Detection Performance for Passive Radars Exploiting Known Communication Signal Form

In this letter, we address the problem of target detection in passive multiple-input multiple-output radar networks. A generalized likelihood ratio test is derived, assuming prior knowledge of the signal format used in the noncooperative transmit stations. The performance of the generalized likelihood ratio test in the known signal format case is often significantly more favorable when compared to the case that does not exploit this information. Further, the performance improves with increasing number of samples per symbol and for a sufficiently large number of samples per symbol, the performance closely approximates that of an active radar with a known transmitted signal.

[1]  Alexander M. Haimovich,et al.  Noncoherent MIMO Radar for Location and Velocity Estimation: More Antennas Means Better Performance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  H. Mattila,et al.  WCDMA uplink modulation scheme evolution and transmitter implementation , 1999, Gateway to 21st Century Communications Village. VTC 1999-Fall. IEEE VTS 50th Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36324).

[3]  Umang R. Mori,et al.  Performance comparison of different modulation schemes in advanced technologies WiMAX and LTE , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC).

[4]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Two Target Detection Algorithms for Passive Multistatic Radar , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Multistatic passive detection with parametric modeling of the IO waveform , 2017, Signal Process..

[6]  Qian He,et al.  MIMO Radar Moving Target Detection in Homogeneous Clutter , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Signal detection with noisy reference for passive sensing , 2015, Signal Process..

[8]  Michael A. Saville,et al.  Centralized Passive MIMO Radar Detection Without Direct-Path Reference Signals , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  Yuan Wang,et al.  Canonical correlations for target detection in a passive radar network , 2016, 2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[10]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Target detection for passive radar with noisy reference channel , 2014, 2014 IEEE Radar Conference.

[11]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  The Significant Gains From Optimally Processed Multiple Signals of Opportunity and Multiple Receive Stations in Passive Radar , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  Zhansheng Duan,et al.  Adaptive Generalized Eigen-Pairs Extraction Algorithms and Their Convergence Analysis , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Multistatic Detection for Passive Radar With Direct-Path Interference , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  Fulvio Gini,et al.  Ambiguity function and Cramer-Rao bounds for universal mobile telecommunications system-based passive coherent location systems , 2012 .

[15]  Yuan Wang,et al.  Passive Detection of Correlated Subspace Signals in Two MIMO Channels , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Stephen J. Searle,et al.  DVB-T Passive Radar Signal Processing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.