Chapter 32 – Science-Based Conservation of Amur Tigers in the Russian Far East and Northeast China

Publisher Summary It was into this chaos that the American team arrived with a simple objective: collect the best possible information on the ecology and population dynamics of Amur tigers as a basis for implementing effective conservation actions. Today, conservation activities focused on the Amur tiger are multi-faceted, broad-based, and implemented by a variety of organizations, both governmental and non-governmental. Some of the most successful programs are predicated on credible science and effective monitoring to inform the conservation process. This chapter explores the relationships and explains how research has informed and guided Amur tiger conservation over a 15-year period. The “traditional” approach to conservation used by many large organizations and donors is to collect initial information as a basis for developing and implementing conservation strategies. Surveys that provide fundamental knowledge about changes in abundance of tiger populations can guide conservation efforts. Conservation planning has become a highly developed process, and there have been numerous algorithms and in-depth research to identify priority landscapes for biodiversity conservation. There is a need for research and conservation to evolve in close alliance, in which the necessities of conservation define the research priorities, and the findings of the research inform and guide the conservation actions.

[1]  Chris R. Shepherd,et al.  Nowhere to hide : the trade in Sumatran tiger , 2004 .

[2]  J. Nichols,et al.  Tigers and their prey: Predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  John M. Goodrich,et al.  Effects of Roads and Human Disturbance on Amur Tigers , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  E. Check Conservation biology: The tiger's retreat , 2006, Nature.

[5]  Peter Jackson,et al.  Wild cats status survey and conservation action plan , 1996 .

[6]  M. Sunquist,et al.  Ecology behaviour and resilience of the tiger and its conservation needs , 1999 .

[7]  E. Sanderson,et al.  A conceptual model for conservation planning based on landscape species requirements , 2002 .

[8]  D. G. Pikunov,et al.  A SURVEY OF AMUR (SIBERIAN) TIGERS IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST, 2004-2005 , 2007 .

[9]  D. G. Pikunov,et al.  1999 SURVEY OF AMUR TIGERS AND FAR EASTERN LEOPARDS IN EASTERN HEILONGJIANG PROVINCE, CHINA AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THEIR CONSERVATION , 2009 .

[10]  C. Carroll,et al.  Spatial viability analysis of Amur tiger Panthera tigris altaica in the Russian Far East: the role of protected areas and landscape matrix in population persistence , 2006 .

[11]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves , 1997 .

[12]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Science deficiency in conservation practice: the monitoring of tiger populations in India , 2003 .