Micro-calcification detection in digital tomosynthesis mammography

A novel technique for the detection and enhancement of microcalcifications in digital tomosynthesis mammography (DTM) is presented. In this method, the DTM projection images are used directly, instead of using a 3D reconstruction. Calcification residual images are computed for each of the projection images. Calcification detection is then performed over 3D space, based on the values of the calcification residual images at projection points for each 3D point under test. The quantum, electronic, and tissue noise variance at each pixel in each of the calcification residuals is incorporated into the detection algorithm. The 3D calcification detection algorithm finds a minimum variance estimate of calcification attenuation present in 3D space based on the signal and variance of the calcification residual images at the corresponding points in the projection images. The method effectively detects calcifications in 3D in a way that both ameliorates the difficulties of joint tissue/microcalcification tomosynthetic reconstruction (streak artifacts, etc.) and exploits the well understood image properties of microcalcifications as they appear in 2D mammograms. In this method, 3D reconstruction and calcification detection and enhancement are effectively combined to create a calcification detection specific reconstruction. Motivation and details of the technique and statistical results for DTM data are provided.

[1]  Steven Kay,et al.  Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing , 2001 .

[2]  Mj Berger,et al.  Photon cross sections database. NIST Standard Reference Database 8 (XGAM) , 1998 .

[3]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Normalization of local contrast in mammograms , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[5]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[7]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized Detection of Mass Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images Using Two- and Three Dimensional Radial Gradient Index Segmentation , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[9]  Arthur E. Burgess Effect of detector element size on signal detectability in digital mammography , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Maria Rifqi,et al.  Fuzzy Techniques in Mammographic Image Processing , 2000 .

[12]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[13]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Reconstruction-Independent 3D CAD for Calcification Detection in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using Fuzzy Particles , 2005, CIARP.

[14]  Jeffrey W. Eberhard,et al.  New method for 3D reconstruction in digital tomosynthesis , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Serge Muller,et al.  Preference Study of Reconstructed Image Quality in Mammographic Tomosynthesis , 2003 .

[16]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Stochastic model for automated detection of calcifications in digital mammograms , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..