Delayed maturation of auditory-evoked responses in growth-restricted fetuses revealed by magnetoencephalographic recordings.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate fetal brain development of growth-restricted fetuses with auditory evoked responses (AER) that were recorded by the noninvasive magnetoencephalographic technique. STUDY DESIGN Serial fetal recordings that started at 27 weeks of gestation were conducted on a fetal magnetoencephalographic device that was especially designed for obstetric assessment. Fifteen normotrophic fetuses were compared with 14 hypotrophic fetuses. After birth, 10 of the hypotrophic fetuses were diagnosed with asymmetric growth restriction; 4 fetuses were classified as symmetrically small for gestational age. RESULTS Fetal AER latencies in both groups showed an average developmental decrease of 12.74 msec/wk (P = .0035). Hypotrophic fetuses had longer age-adjusted latencies compared with normotrophic fetuses, with a difference of 73.5 msec (P = .034). The subgroup of symmetrically growth-restricted fetuses showed the longest latencies for age, with a difference from the normotrophic fetuses of 120.0 msec (P = .045). CONCLUSION The results indicate that biomagnetically recorded AER can be used to monitor functional brain development in growth-restricted fetuses.

[1]  A. Johnson,et al.  Clinical associations of prenatal ischaemic white matter injury. , 1994, Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition.

[2]  R. Wakai,et al.  Fetal auditory evoked responses detected by magnetoencephalography. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Development of auditory evoked fields in human fetuses and newborns: A longitudinal MEG study , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Wakai,et al.  Improved neuromagnetic detection of fetal and neonatal auditory evoked responses , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  A. Baschat,et al.  Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Fetal magnetoencephalography: a non‐invasive method for the assessment of fetal neuronal maturation , 2001, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  N Shinozuka,et al.  Prenatal detection of a high‐risk group for intrauterine growth restriction based on sonographic fetal biometry , 2000, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[8]  A. vanWassenaer Neurodevelopmental consequences of being born SGA. , 2005 .

[9]  B. Maassen,et al.  Detectability of auditory evoked response components in preterm infants. , 1991, Early human development.

[10]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Optimal reduction of MCG in fetal MEG recordings , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Cognitive and neurologic development of the premature, small for gestational age infant through age 6: comparison by birth weight and gestational age. , 1996, Pediatrics.

[12]  R. Littell SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[13]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Serial magnetoencephalographic study of fetal and newborn auditory discriminative evoked responses. , 2007, Early human development.

[14]  J D Wilson,et al.  Challenges of recording human fetal auditory-evoked response using magnetoencephalography. , 2000, The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine.

[15]  Uwe Schneider,et al.  Developmental changes of auditory-evoked fields in fetuses , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[16]  H. Preissl,et al.  Fetal magnetoencephalography: viewing the developing brain in utero. , 2005, International review of neurobiology.

[17]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. , 1991, Radiology.

[18]  E. Saling,et al.  First magnetoencephalographic recordings of the brain activity of a human fetus , 1985, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  D. F. Stegeman,et al.  The maturation of the central auditory conduction in preterm infants until three months post term. V. The auditory cortical response (ACR) , 1987, Hearing Research.

[20]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Short-term serial magnetoencephalography recordings offetal auditory evoked responses , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  D. Holtzman,et al.  Selective Vulnerability of Late Oligodendrocyte Progenitors to Hypoxia–Ischemia , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Burke,et al.  Ischaemic cerebral injury, intrauterine growth retardation, and placental infarction , 1997, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[23]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Fetal MEG redistribution by projection operators , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.