Genetic Algorithm and Deep Learning to Explore Parametric Trends in Nucleate Boiling Heat Transfer Data

Exploring parametric effects in pool boiling is challenging because the dependence of the resulting surface heat flux is often nonlinear, and the mechanisms can interact in complex ways. Historically, parametric effects in nucleate boiling processes have been deduced by fitting relations obtained from physical models to experimental data and from correlated trends in nondimensionalized data. Using such approaches, observed trends are often influenced by the framing of the analysis that results from the modeling or the collection of dimensionless variables used. Machine learning strategies can be attractive alternatives because they can be constructed either to minimize biases or to emphasize specific biases that reflect knowledge of the system physics. The investigation summarized here explores the use of machine learning methods as a tool for determining parametric trends in boiling heat transfer data and as a means for developing methods to predict boiling heat transfer. Results are presented that demonstrate how a genetic algorithm and deep learning can be used to extract heat flux dependencies of a binary mixture on wall superheat, gravity, Marangoni effects, and pressure. The results provide new insight into how gravity and Marangoni effects interact in boiling processes of this type. The results also demonstrate how machine learning tools can clarify how different mechanisms interact in the boiling process, as well as directly providing the ability to predict heat transfer performance for nucleate boiling. Each technique demonstrated clear advantages depending on whether speed, accuracy, or an explicit mathematical model was prioritized.

[1]  Van P. Carey,et al.  Effects of gravity on the boiling of binary fluid mixtures , 1998 .

[2]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[3]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[4]  H. Guterman,et al.  Knowledge extraction from artificial neural network models , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[5]  V. Carey,et al.  Marangoni effects on the boiling of 2-propanol/water mixtures in a confined space , 2004 .

[6]  Zi-Xiang Tong,et al.  Parametric optimization of H-type finned tube with longitudinal vortex generators by response surface model and genetic algorithm , 2019, Applied Energy.

[7]  W. Rohsenow A Method of Correlating Heat-Transfer Data for Surface Boiling of Liquids , 1952, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[8]  Guanghui Su,et al.  Analysis of CHF in saturated forced convective boiling on a heated surface with impinging jets using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm , 2011 .

[9]  Jungho Kim,et al.  Gravity and Heater Size Effects on Pool Boiling Heat Transfer , 2014 .

[10]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of corrugated tube with loose-fit twisted tape using RSM and NSGA-II , 2019, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.

[11]  S. Zaidi,et al.  Comparative analysis for the prediction of boiling heat transfer coefficient of R134a in micro/mini channels using artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques , 2020, International Journal of Modelling and Simulation.

[12]  Afshin Tatar,et al.  A RBF model for predicting the pool boiling behavior of nanofluids over a horizontal rod heater , 2016 .

[13]  F ROSENBLATT,et al.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. , 1958, Psychological review.

[14]  S. Arabia,et al.  Prediction of Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficients in Pool Boiling of Liquids Using Artificial Neural Network , 2014 .

[15]  Chunlei Zhang,et al.  Generalized neural network correlation for flow boiling heat transfer of R22 and its alternative refrigerants inside horizontal smooth tubes , 2006 .

[16]  V. Carey,et al.  Effects of Gap Geometry and Gravity on Boiling Around a Constrained Bubble in 2-Propanol/Water Mixtures , 2007 .

[17]  Behzad Vaferi,et al.  Estimation of pool boiling heat transfer coefficient of alumina water-based nanofluids by various artificial intelligence (AI) approaches , 2018 .

[18]  Saeed Zeinali Heris,et al.  Prediction of the pressure drop for CuO/(Ethylene glycol-water) nanofluid flows in the car radiator by means of Artificial Neural Networks analysis integrated with genetic algorithm , 2020 .

[19]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Ebrahimi-Moghadam,et al.  Optimizing chevron plate heat exchangers based on the second law of thermodynamics and genetic algorithm , 2019, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[21]  V. Carey,et al.  Effects of Surface Orientation on the Pool Boiling Heat Transfer in Water/2-Propanol Mixtures , 1999 .

[22]  J. McQuillen,et al.  Subcooled Pool Boiling in Variable Gravity Environments , 2009 .

[23]  M. Das,et al.  Heat Flux Estimation at Pool Boiling Processes with Computational Intelligence Methods , 2019 .

[24]  J. McQuillen,et al.  On the Scaling of Pool Boiling Heat Flux With Gravity and Heater Size , 2012 .

[25]  W. McGillis,et al.  On the Role of Marangoni Effects on the Critical Heat Flux for Pool Boiling of Binary Mixtures , 1996 .

[26]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[27]  A. S. Dalkılıç,et al.  Investigation of pool boiling of nanofluids using artificial neural networks and correlation development techniques , 2012 .

[28]  V. Dhir Numerical Simulations of Pool-Boiling Heat Transfer , 2001 .

[29]  Mohd Amiruddin Abd Rahman,et al.  Modeling and prediction of the specific heat capacity of Al2 O3/water nanofluids using hybrid genetic algorithm/support vector regression model , 2019, Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects.

[30]  Xiaobing Luo,et al.  A Bi-Layer compact thermal model for uniform chip temperature control with non-uniform heat sources by genetic-algorithm optimized microchannel cooling , 2019, International Journal of Thermal Sciences.

[31]  V. M. Borishanskiĭ 3 – CORRELATION OF THE EFFECT OF PRESSURE ON THE CRITICAL HEAT FLUX AND HEAT TRANSFER RATES USING THE THEORY OF THERMODYNAMIC SIMILARITY , 1969 .

[32]  K. Stephan,et al.  Heat-transfer correlations for natural convection boiling , 1980 .

[33]  Teresa Wu,et al.  Deep learning strategies for critical heat flux detection in pool boiling , 2021, Applied Thermal Engineering.

[34]  V. Dhir Mechanistic Prediction of Nucleate Boiling Heat Transfer-Achievable or a Hopeless Task? , 2006 .

[35]  Atul Thakur,et al.  Deep learning the sound of boiling for advance prediction of boiling crisis , 2021 .

[36]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  A high-fidelity approach to correlate the nucleate pool boiling data of roughened surfaces , 2021 .

[37]  B. P. Avksentyuk Nucleate boiling , 1981 .

[38]  R. I. Vachon,et al.  Evaluation of Constants for the Rohsenow Pool-Boiling Correlation , 1968 .

[39]  Sepp Hochreiter,et al.  Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs) , 2015, ICLR.

[40]  R. Bostanabad,et al.  Deep learning predicts boiling heat transfer , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[41]  D. E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search , 1989 .