Emission-based estimation of lung attenuation coefficients for attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET/MR

In standard segmentation-based MRI-guided attenuation correction (MRAC) of PET data on hybrid PET/MRI systems, the inter/intra-patient variability of linear attenuation coefficients (LACs) is ignored owing to the assignment of a constant LAC to each tissue class. This can lead to PET quantification errors, especially in the lung regions. In this work, we aim to derive continuous and patient-specific lung LACs from time-of-flight (TOF) PET emission data using the maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) algorithm. The MLAA algorithm was constrained for estimation of lung LACs only in the standard 4-class MR attenuation map using Gaussian lung tissue preference and Markov random field smoothness priors. MRAC maps were derived from segmentation of CT images of 19 TOF-PET/CT clinical studies into background air, lung, soft tissue and fat tissue classes, followed by assignment of predefined LACs of 0, 0.0224, 0.0864 and 0.0975 cm(-1), respectively. The lung LACs of the resulting attenuation maps were then estimated from emission data using the proposed MLAA algorithm. PET quantification accuracy of MRAC and MLAA methods was evaluated against the reference CT-based AC method in the lungs, lesions located in/near the lungs and neighbouring tissues. The results show that the proposed MLAA algorithm is capable of retrieving lung density gradients and compensate fairly for respiratory-phase mismatch between PET and corresponding attenuation maps. It was found that the mean of the estimated lung LACs generally follow the trend of the reference CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) method. Quantitative analysis revealed that the MRAC method resulted in average relative errors of -5.2 ± 7.1% and -6.1 ± 6.7% in the lungs and lesions, respectively. These were reduced by the MLAA algorithm to -0.8 ± 6.3% and -3.3 ± 4.7%, respectively. In conclusion, we demonstrated the potential and capability of emission-based methods in deriving patient-specific lung LACs to improve the accuracy of attenuation correction in TOF PET/MR imaging, thus paving the way for their adaptation in the clinic.

[1]  Jean Théberge,et al.  Variable Lung Density Consideration in Attenuation Correction of Whole-Body PET/MRI , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Til Aach,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Bernd J Pichler,et al.  Principles of PET/MR Imaging , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure. , 1991, Anesthesiology.

[5]  H. Zaidi Is MR-guided attenuation correction a viable option for dual-modality PET/MR imaging? , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  R. Günther,et al.  Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  L Kreel,et al.  Pulmonary tissue attenuation with computed tomography: comparison of inspiration and expiration scans. , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  John Butler,et al.  Description and assessment of a registration-based approach to include bones for attenuation correction of whole-body PET/MRI. , 2013, Medical physics.

[12]  Yi Zheng,et al.  Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Diagnostic Classification Models , 2016, Psychometrika.

[13]  M. Defrise,et al.  Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  I. Buvat,et al.  A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Ilja Bezrukov,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Whole-Body PET/MRI: Quantitative Evaluation of Segmentation- and Atlas-Based Methods , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Jae Sung Lee,et al.  Comparison of Segmentation-Based Attenuation Correction Methods for PET/MRI: Evaluation of Bone and Liver Standardized Uptake Value with Oncologic PET/CT Data , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  R. Holen,et al.  The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification. , 2011, Medical physics.

[18]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Clinical Assessment of Emission- and Segmentation-Based MR-Guided Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  MR-Based PET attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging. , 2013, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[20]  S. D. Wollenweber,et al.  Estimation of mean lung attenuation for use in generating PET attenuation maps , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[21]  Å. Wheelock,et al.  Lung density on high resolution computer tomography (HRCT) reflects degree of inflammation in smokers , 2014, Respiratory Research.

[22]  V. Schulz,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for a whole-body sequential PET/MR system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[23]  J. Fessler,et al.  Joint maximum likelihood estimation of emission and attenuation densities in PET , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[24]  G Glatting,et al.  Simultaneous iterative reconstruction of emission and attenuation images in positron emission tomography from emission data only. , 2002, Medical physics.

[25]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  ML-reconstruction for TOF-PET with simultaneous estimation of the attenuation factors , 2014, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[26]  Eduard Schreibmann,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET-MR brain imaging systems using deformable image registration. , 2010, Medical physics.

[27]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  N. Alpert,et al.  Bias Atlases for Segmentation-Based PET Attenuation Correction Using PET-CT and MR , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[29]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MRI-based attenuation correction , 2015 .

[30]  James E. Bowsher,et al.  An EM algorithm for estimating SPECT emission and transmission parameters from emission data only , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  LSO background radiation as a transmission source using time of flight information , 2013 .

[32]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Assessment of Emission-and Segmentation-Based MR-Guided Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body Time-of-Flight PET / MR Imaging , 2015 .

[33]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Quantification Errors in MR Imaging–Based Attenuation Correction , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Sabrina S Wilson Radiology , 1938, Glasgow Medical Journal.

[35]  A. V. Bronnikov,et al.  Reconstruction of attenuation map using discrete consistency conditions , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  MRI-based pseudo-CT generation using sorted atlas images in whole-body PET/MRI , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[37]  Mark T. Madsen,et al.  Emission based attenuation correction of PET images of the thorax , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[38]  Marcel Zeelenberg,et al.  Data analysis 2 , 2016 .

[39]  M E Casey,et al.  Simultaneous reconstruction of emission activity and attenuation coefficient distribution from TOF data, acquired with external transmission source , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Adam Johansson,et al.  CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time. , 2011, Medical physics.

[41]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MR-Based Attenuation Correction Methods for Improved PET Quantification in Lesions Within Bone and Susceptibility Artifact Regions , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  Christian Michel,et al.  Application of discrete data consistency conditions for selecting regularization parameters in PET attenuation map reconstruction. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Aggelos K. Katsaggelos,et al.  General choice of the regularization functional in regularized image restoration , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[44]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[45]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Joint Estimation of Activity and Attenuation in Whole-Body TOF PET/MRI Using Constrained Gaussian Mixture Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[46]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation in Time-of-Flight PET , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[47]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Investigation of 3D UTE MRI for lung PET attenuation correction , 2014 .

[48]  Krzysztof Kacperski Attenuation correction in SPECT without attenuation map , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[49]  Orazio Schillaci,et al.  18F-choline PET/CT physiological distribution and pitfalls in image interpretation: experience in 80 patients with prostate cancer , 2010, Nuclear medicine communications.

[50]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  Charles C. Watson,et al.  Supplemental transmission method for improved PET attenuation correction on an integrated MR/PET , 2014 .

[52]  H. Quick,et al.  Magnetic Resonance–Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MR Hybrid Imaging Using Continuous Valued Attenuation Maps , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[53]  Vincent Keereman,et al.  Improvement of Attenuation Correction in Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging with a Positron-Emitting Source , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[54]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Clinical Assessment of MR-Guided 3-Class and 4-Class Attenuation Correction in PET/MR , 2015, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[55]  M. Conti Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[56]  Rolf Clackdoyle,et al.  Attenuation correction in PET using consistency information , 1998 .

[57]  Yannick Berker,et al.  Lung attenuation coefficient estimation using Maximum Likelihood reconstruction of attenuation and activity for PET/MR attenuation correction , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).