Bayesian uncertainty assessment of a semi-distributed integrated catchment model of phosphorus transport.

Process-based models of nutrient transport are often used as tools for management of eutrophic waters, as decision makers need to judge the potential effects of alternative remediation measures, under current conditions and with future land use and climate change. All modelling exercises entail uncertainty arising from various sources, such as the input data, selection of parameter values and the choice of model itself. Here we perform Bayesian uncertainty assessment of an integrated catchment model of phosphorus (INCA-P). We use an auto-calibration procedure and an algorithm for including parametric uncertainty to simulate phosphorus transport in a Norwegian lowland river basin. Two future scenarios were defined to exemplify the importance of parametric uncertainty in generating predictions. While a worst case scenario yielded a robust prediction of increased loading of phosphorus, a best case scenario only gave rise to a reduction in load with probability 0.78, highlighting the importance of taking parametric uncertainty into account in process-based catchment scale modelling of possible remediation scenarios. Estimates of uncertainty can be included in information provided to decision makers, thus making a stronger scientific basis for sound decisions to manage water resources.

[1]  S. Anthony,et al.  Description of nine nutrient loss models: capabilities and suitability based on their characteristics. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[2]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[3]  J. Freer,et al.  Diffuse phosphorus models in the United States and europe: their usages, scales, and uncertainties. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models , 2003 .

[5]  P G Whitehead,et al.  Using the INCA-Hg model of mercury cycling to simulate total and methyl mercury concentrations in forest streams and catchments. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  W. Bouten,et al.  Towards reduced uncertainty in catchment nitrogen modelling: quantifying the effect of field observation uncertainty on model calibration , 2004 .

[7]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[8]  Jasper A Vrugt,et al.  Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  B Grizzetti,et al.  Basin characteristics and nutrient losses: the EUROHARP catchment network perspective. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[10]  Keith Beven,et al.  On doing better hydrological science , 2008 .

[11]  E. J. Wilson,et al.  A semi-distributed integrated flow and nitrogen model for multiple source assessment in catchments (INCA): Part II — application to large river basins in south Wales and eastern England , 1998 .

[12]  George Kuczera,et al.  Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm , 1998 .

[13]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Model identification for hydrological forecasting under uncertainty , 2005 .

[14]  Véronique Beaujouan,et al.  A nitrogen model for European catchments: INCA, new model structure and equations , 2002 .

[15]  George M. Hornberger,et al.  On modeling the mechanisms that control in‐stream phosphorus, macrophyte, and epiphyte dynamics: An assessment of a new model using general sensitivity analysis , 2001 .

[16]  Katri Rankinen,et al.  An application of the GLUE methodology for estimating the parameters of the INCA-N model. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters , 2002 .

[18]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? , 2009 .

[19]  Andrew J. Wade,et al.  The Integrated Catchments model of Phosphorus dynamics (INCA-P), a new approach for multiple source assessment in heterogeneous river systems: model structure and equations , 2002 .

[20]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods , 2000 .

[22]  K. Beven,et al.  Managing the impacts of nutrient enrichment on river systems: dealing with complex uncertainties in risk analyses , 2012 .

[23]  H. Paerl,et al.  Controlling Eutrophication: Nitrogen and Phosphorus , 2009, Science.

[24]  E. J. Wilson,et al.  A semi-distributed ntegrated itrogen model for multiple source assessment in tchments (INCA): Part I — model structure and process equations , 1998 .

[25]  A. Wade,et al.  Understanding hydrological and nitrogen interactions by sensitivity analysis of a catchment-scale nitrogen model , 2005 .

[26]  J. Refsgaard,et al.  Operational Validation and Intercomparison of Different Types of Hydrological Models , 1996 .

[27]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[28]  R. Spear.  Eutrophication in peel inlet—II. Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis , 1980 .

[29]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[30]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[31]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[32]  Tuomo Saloranta,et al.  Highlighting the model code selection and application process in policy-relevant water quality modelling , 2006 .

[33]  A. Wade,et al.  Modelling phosphorus dynamics in multi-branch river systems: a study of the Black River, Lake Simcoe, Ontario, Canada. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of a process-based integrated catchment model of phosphorus , 2009 .

[35]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Hydraulic properties of a model dike from coupled Bayesian and multi-criteria hydrogeophysical inversion , 2010 .

[36]  Heikki Haario,et al.  DRAM: Efficient adaptive MCMC , 2006, Stat. Comput..

[37]  Martyn N. Futter,et al.  Modeling the mechanisms that control in‐stream dissolved organic carbon dynamics in upland and forested catchments , 2007 .

[38]  K. Beven.  On undermining the science? , 2006 .

[39]  W. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[40]  M. Bechmann,et al.  Soil erosion and phosphorus losses under variable land use as simulated by the INCA‐P model , 2013 .