Genetic diversity and the agony of choice

[1]  Pekka Pamilo,et al.  Evolutionary patterns in some putative Australian species in the ant genus Rhytidoponera , 1986 .

[2]  M. Nei Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[3]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[4]  J. Felsenstein CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  C. Daugherty,et al.  Neglected taxonomy and continuing extinctions of tuatara (Sphenodon) , 1990, Nature.

[6]  Robert M. May,et al.  Taxonomy as destiny , 1990, Nature.

[7]  A. Meyer,et al.  Monophyletic origin of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes suggested by mitochondrial DNA sequences , 1990, Nature.

[8]  P. Pamilo STATISTICAL TESTS OF PHENOGRAMS BASED ON GENETIC DISTANCES , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  A. Dickerman,et al.  BOOTSTRAP ANALYSIS OF PHYLOGENETIC TREES DERIVED FROM DNA HYBRIDIZATION DISTANCES , 1990 .

[10]  A. Templeton MECHANISMS OF SPECIATION­ A POPULATION GENETIC APPROACH , 1981 .

[11]  D. Faith Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[12]  W. Wheeler,et al.  Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: evolutionary and phylogenetic implications. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  A. Templeton ANALYSIS OF HEAD SHAPE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TWO INTERFERTILE SPECIES OF HAWAIIAN DROSOPHILA , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. , 1988, Annual review of genetics.

[15]  R. Crozier Molecular Methods for Insect Phylogenetics , 1993 .