A Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Eulerian-Eulerian Two-Fluid Model based Multiphase-CFD Solver. Part I: Methodology

This paper is the second part of a two-part series, which introduces and demonstrates a Validation and Uncertainty Quantification (VUQ) framework that serves two major purposes: i). quantify the uncertainties of the closure relation parameters and predictions of the Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics (MCFD) solver; ii). evaluate the agreement between the solver predictions and the experimental measurements. The framework, with the corresponding theory and method, are outlined in the first part paper. In this paper, the workflow of the framework is implemented and demonstrated for two relevant case studies: the wall boiling heat transfer in subcooled boiling flow and the adiabatic bubbly flow. The influential closure relation parameters for multiple quantities of interest (QoIs) are identified through two different global sensitivity analysis (GSA) methods: Morris screening and Sobol indices. The model form uncertainty and model parameter uncertainty of relevant closure relations are evaluated using the modular Bayesian approach. The uncertainties of QoIs are quantified by propagating the obtained uncertainties through the solver. The agreement between solver predicted QoIs and the experimental measurement are evaluated using two different validation metrics: confidence interval and area metric. The results demonstrate the applicability of the framework.

[1]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[2]  Chul-Hwa Song,et al.  A bubble dynamics-based model for wall heat flux partitioning during nucleate flow boiling , 2017 .

[3]  D. Kenning,et al.  Subcooled flow boiling at high heat flux , 1985 .

[4]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Development of one-group interfacial area transport equation in bubbly flow systems , 2002 .

[5]  D. Higdon,et al.  Computer Model Calibration Using High-Dimensional Output , 2008 .

[6]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Polynomial Response Surface Approximations for the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a High Speed Civil Transport , 2001 .

[7]  Emilio Baglietto,et al.  A self-consistent, physics-based boiling heat transfer modeling framework for use in computational fluid dynamics , 2017 .

[8]  Eckhard Krepper,et al.  CFD for Subcooled Flow Boiling: Parametric Variations , 2013 .

[9]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2002 .

[10]  Eckhard Krepper,et al.  CFD modelling of subcooled boiling—Concept, validation and application to fuel assembly design , 2007 .

[11]  Dave Higdon,et al.  Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Foundation of the interfacial area transport equation and its closure relations , 1995 .

[13]  I. Sobol Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[14]  S. Cheung,et al.  Modeling subcooled flow boiling in vertical channels at low pressures – Part 2: Evaluation of mechanistic approach , 2014 .

[15]  V. Dhir,et al.  Effect of Surface Wettability on Active Nucleation Site Density During Pool Boiling of Water on a Ve , 1993 .

[16]  Warren M. Rohsenow,et al.  Heat Transfer with Boiling , 1963 .

[17]  W. E. Ranz,et al.  Evaporation from drops , 1952 .

[18]  Robert Youngblood,et al.  Demonstration of Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of Safety Analysis Codes: Theory and Formulation , 2015 .

[19]  Heikki Haario,et al.  DRAM: Efficient adaptive MCMC , 2006, Stat. Comput..

[20]  Pietro Poesio,et al.  Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of mechanistic one-dimensional models and flow pattern transition boundaries predictions for two-phase pipe flows , 2017 .

[21]  James O. Berger,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of the thermal challenge problem , 2008 .

[22]  W. Oberkampf,et al.  Validation of imprecise probability models , 2009 .

[23]  Eckhard Krepper,et al.  The inhomogeneous MUSIG model for the simulation of polydispersed flows , 2008 .

[24]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Active nucleation site density in boiling systems , 2003 .

[25]  Qiqi Wang,et al.  Erratum: Active Subspace Methods in Theory and Practice: Applications to Kriging Surfaces , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[26]  Emilio Baglietto,et al.  Assessment of a simplified set of momentum closure relations for low volume fraction regimes in STAR-CCM+ and OpenFOAM , 2017 .

[27]  M. Guingo,et al.  Computational multi-fluid dynamics predictions of critical heat flux in boiling flow , 2016 .

[28]  Michael Z. Podowski,et al.  MULTIDIMENSIONAL EFFECTS IN FORCED CONVECTION SUBCOOLED BOILING , 1990 .

[29]  G. Kocamustafaogullari,et al.  Pressure dependence of bubble departure diameter for water , 1983 .

[30]  P. Roache QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS , 1997 .

[31]  Tomasz Kozlowski,et al.  Inverse uncertainty quantification of TRACE physical model parameters using sparse gird stochastic collocation surrogate model , 2017 .

[32]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[33]  R. Pitchumani,et al.  QUICKER: Quantifying Uncertainty In Computational Knowledge Engineering Rapidly—A rapid methodology for uncertainty analysis , 2014 .

[34]  H. T. Banks,et al.  Parameter selection methods in inverse problem formulation , 2020, 2004.07821.

[35]  Franz Mayinger,et al.  Measurement of heat transfer at the phase interface of condensing bubbles , 1992 .

[36]  J. C. R. Hunt,et al.  The force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady non-uniform rotational flow , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[37]  T. Kozlowski,et al.  Inverse uncertainty quantification of reactor simulations under the Bayesian framework using surrogate models constructed by polynomial chaos expansion , 2017 .

[38]  W. Oberkampf,et al.  Model validation and predictive capability for the thermal challenge problem , 2008 .

[39]  Yuan Guo-xing,et al.  Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing Code , 2010 .

[40]  Igor A. Bolotnov,et al.  Evaluation of bubble-induced turbulence using direct numerical simulation , 2017 .

[41]  Tadashi Sakaguchi,et al.  Drag Coefficients of Single Bubbles under Normal and Micro Gravity Conditions , 1998 .

[42]  R. Cole Bubble frequencies and departure volumes at subatmospheric pressures , 1967 .

[43]  Qinggong Wang,et al.  Computation and validation of the interphase force models for bubbly flow , 2016 .

[44]  Chul H. Song,et al.  Modeling of bubble coalescence and break-up considering turbulent suppression phenomena in bubbly two-phase flow , 2013 .

[45]  George Yadigaroglu,et al.  CMFD and the critical-heat-flux grand challenge in nuclear thermal–hydraulics – A letter to the Editor of this special issue , 2014 .

[46]  N. Zuber,et al.  Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows , 1979 .

[47]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations , 1998 .

[48]  T. Frank,et al.  The Favre Averaged Drag Model for Turbulent Dispersion in Eulerian Multi-Phase Flows , 2004 .

[49]  Matthew F. Barone,et al.  Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: Validation metrics , 2004, J. Comput. Phys..

[50]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[51]  S. Yang,et al.  A mathematical model of the pool boiling nucleation site density in terms of the surface characteristics , 1988 .

[52]  Saman A. Aryana,et al.  A Bayesian model selection analysis of equilibrium and nonequilibrium models for multiphase flow in porous media , 2017 .

[53]  R. Mei,et al.  A unified model for the prediction of bubble detachment diameters in boiling systems—II. Flow boiling , 1993 .

[54]  A. D. Gosman,et al.  Multidimensional modeling of turbulent two‐phase flows in stirred vessels , 1992 .

[55]  Wei Yao,et al.  Volumetric interfacial area prediction in upward bubbly two-phase flow , 2004 .

[56]  Michael Fairweather,et al.  Accuracy of Eulerian–Eulerian, two-fluid CFD boiling models of subcooled boiling flows , 2016 .

[57]  Wei Chen,et al.  Toward a Better Understanding of Model Validation Metrics , 2011 .

[58]  G. Tryggvason,et al.  Using statistical learning to close two-fluid multiphase flow equations for bubbly flows in vertical channels , 2016 .

[59]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  Assessment Criteria for Computational Fluid Dynamics Model Validation Experiments , 2017 .