NeuroMark: an adaptive independent component analysis framework for estimating reproducible and comparable fMRI biomarkers among brain disorders

Summary Increasing sharing initiatives on neuroimaging data have provided unprecedented opportunities to study brain disorders. Standardized approaches for capturing reproducible and comparable biomarkers are greatly needed. Here, we propose a method, NeuroMark, which leverages a priori-driven independent component analysis to effectively extract functional brain network biomarkers from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. NeuroMark automatically estimates features adaptable to each individual and comparable across subjects by taking advantage of the replicated brain network templates extracted from 1828 healthy controls as guidance to initialize the individual-level networks. Four studies including 2454 subjects were conducted spanning six brain disorders (schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease) to evaluate the proposed method from different perspectives (replication, cross-study comparison, subtle difference identification, and multi-disorder classification). Results demonstrate the great potential of NeuroMark in its feasibility to link different datasets/studies/disorders and enhance sensitivity in identifying biomarkers for patients with challenging mental illnesses. Significance Statement Increasing evidence highlights that features extracted from resting fMRI data can be leveraged as potential biomarkers of brain disorders. However, it has been difficult to replicate results using different datasets, translate findings across studies, and differentiate brain disorders sharing similar clinical symptoms. It is important to systematically characterize the degree to which unique and similar impaired patterns are reflective of brain disorders. We propose a fully automated method (called NeuroMark) that leverages priori-driven independent component analysis (ICA) using replicated brain network templates to estimate individual-subject network features. Evaluated by four studies involving six different brain disorders, we show that NeuroMark can effectively link the comparison of biomarkers across different studies/datasets/disorders and enable classification between complex brain disorders, while also providing information about relevant aspects of whole brain functional connectivity.

[1]  T. Colibazzi,et al.  Journal Watch review of Research domain criteria (RDoC) , 2014, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[2]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[3]  Bing Chen,et al.  An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics , 2014, Scientific Data.

[4]  J. Wall,et al.  Functional Network Overlap as Revealed by fMRI Using sICA and Its Potential Relationships with Functional Heterogeneity, Balanced Excitation and Inhibition, and Sparseness of Neuron Activity , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[6]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Classification of schizophrenia and bipolar patients using static and dynamic resting-state fMRI brain connectivity , 2016, NeuroImage.

[7]  N. Filippini,et al.  Group comparison of resting-state FMRI data using multi-subject ICA and dual regression , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  D. Meyer,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis of autism and schizophrenia spectrum traits , 2017 .

[9]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[10]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[11]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Hommer,et al.  Schizophrenia and autism-related disorders. , 2015, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[13]  A. Belger,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[14]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Zening Fu,et al.  Altered static and dynamic functional network connectivity in Alzheimer's disease and subcortical ischemic vascular disease: shared and specific brain connectivity abnormalities , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[16]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Source‐based morphometry: The use of independent component analysis to identify gray matter differences with application to schizophrenia , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[17]  C. Keysers,et al.  Increased Functional Connectivity Between Subcortical and Cortical Resting-State Networks in Autism Spectrum Disorder. , 2015, JAMA psychiatry.

[18]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise? , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Comparison of IVA and GIG-ICA in Brain Functional Network Estimation Using fMRI Data , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[20]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Multisubject Independent Component Analysis of fMRI: A Decade of Intrinsic Networks, Default Mode, and Neurodiagnostic Discovery , 2012, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Replicability of time-varying connectivity patterns in large resting state fMRI samples , 2017, NeuroImage.

[22]  Hao He,et al.  Artifact removal in the context of group ICA: A comparison of single‐subject and group approaches , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Semiblind spatial ICA of fMRI using spatial constraints , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Yingli Lu,et al.  Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  Masaki Fukunaga,et al.  Role of subcortical structures on cognitive and social function in schizophrenia , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[27]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[28]  Hao He,et al.  Comparing brain graphs in which nodes are regions of interest or independent components: A simulation study , 2017, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Transient increased thalamic-sensory connectivity and decreased whole-brain dynamism in autism , 2019, NeuroImage.

[30]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Interaction among subsystems within default mode network diminished in schizophrenia patients: A dynamic connectivity approach , 2016, Schizophrenia Research.

[31]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Ten Key Observations on the Analysis of Resting-state Functional MR Imaging Data Using Independent Component Analysis. , 2017, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[33]  V Calhoun,et al.  Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication‐class of response in complex patients , 2018, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[34]  René J. Huster,et al.  A Tutorial Review on Multi-subject Decomposition of EEG , 2017, Brain Topography.

[35]  Dongdong Lin,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity impairments in early schizophrenia and clinical high-risk for psychosis , 2017, NeuroImage.

[36]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Icasso: software for investigating the reliability of ICA estimates by clustering and visualization , 2003, 2003 IEEE XIII Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8718).

[37]  Stephan Heckers,et al.  Thalamocortical dysconnectivity in schizophrenia. , 2012, The American journal of psychiatry.

[38]  Kai Li,et al.  Computational approaches to fMRI analysis , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  The tenth annual MLSP competition: Schizophrenia classification challenge , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP).

[40]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A projection pursuit algorithm to classify individuals using fMRI data: Application to schizophrenia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[41]  Yuhui Du,et al.  Identification of subject specific and functional consistent ROIs using semi-supervised learning , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[42]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[43]  Luis Cuadros-Rodríguez,et al.  Quality performance metrics in multivariate classification methods for qualitative analysis , 2016 .

[44]  Vince D Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of neurocognitive networks in children , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[45]  Lubin Wang,et al.  Association between Thalamocortical Functional Connectivity Abnormalities and Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[46]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI , 2010, Science.

[47]  Shigeki Aoki,et al.  Functional Connectivity of the Caudate in Schizophrenia Evaluated with Simultaneous Resting-State Functional MRI and Electroencephalography Recordings , 2018, Neuropsychobiology.

[48]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Automatic Identification of Functional Clusters in fMRI Data Using Spatial Dependence , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  Yuhui Du,et al.  Group information guided ICA for fMRI data analysis , 2013, NeuroImage.

[50]  M. Dwyer,et al.  Gray matter atrophy patterns in multiple sclerosis: A 10-year source-based morphometry study , 2017, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[51]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  A decade of test-retest reliability of functional connectivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, NeuroImage.

[52]  T. Suppes,et al.  Informing DSM-5: biological boundaries between bipolar I disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[53]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Data sharing in neuroimaging research , 2012, Front. Neuroinform..

[55]  R. Kana,et al.  Aberrant “deep connectivity” in autism: A cortico–subcortical functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging study , 2019, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.