Shared neural resources between music and language indicate semantic processing of musical tension-resolution patterns.

Harmonic tension-resolution patterns have long been hypothesized to be meaningful to listeners familiar with Western music. Even though it has been shown that specifically chosen musical pieces can prime meaningful concepts, the empirical evidence in favor of such a highly specific semantic pathway has been lacking. Here we show that 2 event-related potentials in response to harmonic expectancy violations, the early right anterior negativity (ERAN) and the N500, could be systematically modulated by simultaneously presented language material containing either a syntactic or a semantic violation. Whereas the ERAN was reduced only when presented concurrently with a syntactic language violation and not with a semantic language violation, this pattern was reversed for the N500. This is the first piece of evidence showing that tension- resolution patterns represent a route to meaning in music.

[1]  C. Krumhansl,et al.  The representation of harmonic structure in music: Hierarchies of stability as a function of context , 1983, Cognition.

[2]  Petr Janata,et al.  ERP Measures Assay the Degree of Expectancy Violation of Harmonic Contexts in Music , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  B. Tillmann,et al.  Effect of global structure and temporal organization on chord processing , 1999 .

[4]  F. Lerdahl,et al.  Perception of musical tension in short chord sequences: The influence of harmonic function, sensory dissonance, horizontal motion, and musical training , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Walter A. Siebel,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.12 December 2005 Towards , 2022 .

[6]  H. Kolk,et al.  Accessing world knowledge: evidence from N400 and reaction time priming. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Processing of Musical Syntax Tonic versus Subdominant: An Event-related Potential Study , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Language, music, syntax and the brain , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Leonard B. Meyer Emotion and Meaning in Music , 1957 .

[10]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  C. Krumhansl The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  C. Krumhansl,et al.  Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. , 1982 .

[15]  F. Macar,et al.  An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  The Role of Harmonic Expectancy Violations in Musical Emotions: Evidence from Subjective, Physiological, and Neural Responses , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Friederici,et al.  Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: an MEG study , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  B. Tillmann,et al.  Implicit learning of tonality: a self-organizing approach. , 2000, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Bharucha,et al.  Reaction time and musical expectancy: priming of chords. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[21]  A. Friederici,et al.  Music, language and meaning: brain signatures of semantic processing , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Friederici,et al.  Processing Tonal Modulations: An ERP Study , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  C. Krumhansl,et al.  Measuring and Modeling Real-Time Responses to Music: The Dynamics of Tonality Induction , 2003, Perception.

[24]  A. Friederici,et al.  Brain Indices of Music Processing: Nonmusicians are Musical , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[27]  C. Krumhansl A Perceptual Analysis of Mozart's Piano Sonata K. 282: Segmentation, Tension, and Musical Ideas , 1996 .

[28]  R. Peereman,et al.  Musical structure modulates semantic priming in vocal music , 2005, Cognition.

[29]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Musical structure is processed in “language” areas of the brain: a possible role for Brodmann Area 47 in temporal coherence , 2003, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Ullman A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  S. Koelsch Neural substrates of processing syntax and semantics in music , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  M. Woldorff,et al.  Effects of attention on the neural processing of harmonic syntax in Western music. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  S. Bookheimer Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Interaction between Syntax Processing in Language and in Music: An ERP Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  A Generative Theory of Tonal Music , 1985 .

[36]  C. Krumhansl Music: A Link Between Cognition and Emotion , 2002 .

[37]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .