Sensitivity of U.S. surface ozone to future emissions and climate changes

The relative contributions of projected future emissions and climate changes to U.S. surface ozone concentrations are investigated focusing on California, the Midwest, the Northeast, and Texas. By 2050 regional average ozone concentrations increase by 2–15% under the IPCC SRES A1Fi (“dirty”) scenario, and decrease by 4–12% under the B1 (relatively “clean”) scenario. However, the magnitudes of ozone changes differ significantly between major metropolitan and rural areas. These ozone changes are dominated by the emissions changes in 61% area of the contiguous U.S. under the B1 scenario, but are largely determined by the projected climate changes in 46% area under the A1Fi scenario. In the ozone responses to climate changes, the biogenic emissions changes contribute strongly over the Northeast, moderately in the Midwest, and negligibly in other regions.

[1]  Allison L. Steiner,et al.  Influence of future climate and emissions on regional air quality in California , 2006 .

[2]  R. Vautard,et al.  Future global tropospheric ozone changes and impact on European air quality , 2006 .

[3]  Jianping Pan,et al.  Regional climate model downscaling of the U.S. summer climate and future change , 2006 .

[4]  P. Hess,et al.  How does climate change contribute to surface ozone change over the United States , 2006 .

[5]  Ho‐Chun Huang.  Seasonal simulation of tropospheric ozone over the Eastern U.S.: An application of a coupled regional climate and air quality modeling system , 2005 .

[6]  Kenneth E. Kunkel,et al.  Regional climate model simulation of summer precipitation diurnal cycle over the United States , 2004 .

[7]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Simulating changes in regional air pollution over the eastern United States due to changes in global and regional climate and emissions , 2004 .

[8]  K. Kunkel,et al.  Regional Climate Model Simulation of U.S. Precipitation during 1982–2002. Part I: Annual Cycle , 2004 .

[9]  D. Wuebbles,et al.  A summer simulation of biogenic contributions to ground‐level ozone over the continental United States , 2003 .

[10]  Richard G. Derwent,et al.  Fresh air in the 21st century? , 2003 .

[11]  David G. Streets,et al.  Linking ozone pollution and climate change: The case for controlling methane , 2002 .

[12]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[13]  Jeffrey M. Vukovich,et al.  Emission inventory development and processing for the Seasonal Model for Regional Air Quality (SMRAQ) project , 2000 .

[14]  Robin L. Dennis,et al.  Influence of increased isoprene emissions on regional ozone modeling , 1998 .

[15]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions , 1995 .

[16]  S. Roselle,et al.  Effects of biogenic emission uncertainties on regional photochemical modeling of control strategies , 1994 .

[17]  W. G. Strand,et al.  Parallel climate model (PCM) control and transient simulations , 2000 .

[18]  Lake Springfield,et al.  Illinois State Water Survey , 1991 .

[19]  T. W. Tesche,et al.  Improvement of procedures for evaluating photochemical models , 1990 .