Cultural Differences in Brand Extension Evaluation: The Influence of Analytic versus Holistic Thinking

Consumers evaluate brand extensions by judging how well they fit with the parent brand. We examine this process across cultures. We predict that consumers from Eastern cultures, characterized by holistic thinking, perceive higher brand extension fit and evaluate brand extensions more favorably than do Western consumers, characterized by analytic thinking. Study 1 supports the existence of these cultural differences, with study 2 providing support for styles of thinking (analytic vs. holistic) as the drivers of cultural differences in brand extension evaluations.

[1]  S. Shavitt,et al.  Issues and New Directions in Global Consumer Psychology , 2000 .

[2]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  Accessibility or Diagnosticity? Disentangling the Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes , 2000 .

[3]  C. Chiu,et al.  Multicultural minds. A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[4]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact? , 1993 .

[5]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Consumer Response to Brand Extensions: Does Culture Matter? , 2004 .

[6]  Richard A. Shweder,et al.  Thinking Through Cultures: Expe-ditions in Cultural Psychology , 1991 .

[7]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  “I” Value Freedom, but “We” Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment , 1999 .

[8]  P. Bottomley,et al.  Do We Really Know how Consumers Evaluate Brand Extensions? Empirical Generalizations Based on Secondary Analysis of Eight Studies , 2001 .

[9]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Branding and brand equity , 2002 .

[10]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. , 1999 .

[11]  L. Chiu.  A CROSS‐CULTURAL COMPARISON OF COGNITIVE STYLES IN CHINESE AND AMERICAN CHILDREN , 1972 .

[12]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[13]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Planning Technology Investments for High Payoffs: A Rational Expectations Approach to Gauging Potential and Realized Value in a Changing Environment , 2007 .

[14]  B. Hannover,et al.  The semantic--procedural interface model of the self: the role of self-knowledge for context-dependent versus context-independent modes of thinking. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  J. G. Miller.  Culture and development of everyday social explanation. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Product-Category Dynamics and Corporate Identity in Brand Extensions: A Comparison of Hong Kong and U.S. Consumers , 1996 .

[17]  R. Dalal,et al.  Culture and judgment of causal relevance. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  R. Nisbett,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Attending Holistically Versus Analytically: Comparing the Context Sensitivity of Japanese and Americans , 2004 .

[19]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  “I” Seek Pleasures and “We” Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion , 2001 .

[20]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  Reasons as Carriers of Culture: Dynamic vs. Dispositional Models of Cultural Influence on Decision Making. Рассуждения как носители культуры: динамическая и диспозитная модели культурного влияния на принятие решений , 2000 .

[21]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[22]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.