Stochastic response of reinforced concrete buildings using high dimensional model representation

Abstract Dynamic responses of structures are random in nature due to the uncertainties in geometry, material properties, and loading. The random dynamic responses can be represented fairly well by stochastic analysis. The methods used for stochastic analysis can be grouped into statistical and non-statistical approaches. Although statistical approaches like Monte Carlo simulation is considered as an accurate method for the stochastic analysis, computationally less intensive yet efficient, simplified non-statistical methods are necessary as an alternative. The present study is an evaluation of a relatively new non-statistical metamodel-based approach known as, High Dimensional Model Representation, with reference to existing response surface methods such as Central Composite Design, Box Behnken Design, and Full Factorial Design, in a dynamic response analysis. The geometry of a reinforced concrete frame is chosen to conduct free vibration and nonlinear dynamic analysis to study the stochastic responses using High Dimensional Model Representation method. This method was found to provide results as good as other methods with less computational effort with regard to the selected case studies.

[1]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[2]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  The impact of modelling uncertainties on the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frame buildings , 2013 .

[3]  Özer Ay,et al.  FRAGILITY BASED ASSESSMENT OF LOW-RISE AND MID-RISE REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME BUILDINGS IN TURKEY , 2006 .

[4]  Murari Lal Gambhir,et al.  Stability Analysis and Design of Structures , 2004 .

[5]  In-Kil Choi,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of system fragility for seismic safety evaluation of NPP , 2011 .

[6]  Kallappa M Koti Optimum stratified sampling using prior information , 1988 .

[7]  Bekir Özer AY,et al.  Vulnerability of Turkish Low-Rise and Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures , 2008 .

[8]  Chen Qiao-sheng,et al.  A Brief Introduction of FEMA P695—Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors , 2013 .

[9]  R. Park,et al.  Flexural Members with Confined Concrete , 1971 .

[10]  Barry J. Goodno,et al.  Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events , 2012 .

[11]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  Reliability of Structures , 2000 .

[12]  Manak Bhavan,et al.  CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES , 2002 .

[13]  Joonam Park,et al.  Rapid seismic damage assessment of railway bridges using the response-surface statistical model , 2014 .

[14]  A. Elnashai,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF ANALYTICAL VULNERABILITY FUNCTIONS TO INPUT AND RESPONSE PARAMETER RANDOMNESS , 2002 .

[15]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[17]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  SEISMIC FRAGILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES USING A RESPONSE SURFACE APPROACH , 2003 .

[18]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges , 2013 .

[19]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Method for Probabilistic Evaluation of Seismic Structural Damage , 1996 .

[20]  Sujith Mangalathu Sivasubramanian Pillai,et al.  Performance based grouping and fragility analysis of box-girder bridges in California , 2017 .

[21]  Barbara Ferracuti,et al.  Response Surface with random factors for seismic fragility of reinforced concrete frames , 2010 .

[22]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models , 2008 .

[23]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .

[24]  A. S. Hoback,et al.  Least weight design of steel pile foundations , 1993 .

[25]  H. Rabitz,et al.  Efficient input-output model representations , 1999 .

[26]  J. Padgett,et al.  Analysis of Covariance to Capture the Importance of Bridge Attributes on the Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model , 2015 .

[27]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[28]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure , 2006 .

[29]  A. M. Prasad,et al.  Development of fragility curves using high‐dimensional model representation , 2013 .

[30]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[31]  Vinay K. Gupta,et al.  WAVELET-BASED GENERATION OF SPECTRUM COMPATIBLE TIME-HISTORIES , 2002 .

[32]  C. F. Jeff Wu,et al.  Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization , 2000 .

[33]  Pedro G. Coelho,et al.  Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[34]  James E. Campbell,et al.  An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part I—Introduction, Input Variable Selection and Preliminary Variable Assessment , 1981 .

[35]  Bruce Ellingwood,et al.  Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58 , 1980 .

[36]  G. Box,et al.  Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables , 1960 .

[37]  D. C. Haran Pragalath,et al.  Multiplication factor for open ground storey buildings–a reliability based evaluation , 2016, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[38]  James L. Beck,et al.  Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables , 2002 .

[39]  K. S. Babu Narayan,et al.  Sensitivity of Pushover Curve to Material and Geometric Modelling—An Analytical Investigation , 2015 .

[40]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  ANCOVA-based grouping of bridge classes for seismic fragility assessment , 2016 .

[41]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Risk methodology for geologic disposal of radioactive waste: small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment , 1980 .

[42]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  Probability density evolution analysis of engineering structures via cubature points , 2012 .

[43]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part II - Ranking of Input Variables, Response Surface Validation, Distribution Effect and Technique Synopsis , 1981 .

[44]  Pradip Sarkar,et al.  Sensitivity and Reliability Analysis of Masonry Infilled Frames , 2016 .

[45]  M. Stein Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling , 1987 .

[46]  Anupam Chakrabarti,et al.  Stochastic free vibration analysis of laminated composite plates using polynomial correlated function expansion , 2016 .

[47]  A. Meher Prasad,et al.  High‐dimensional model representation for structural reliability analysis , 2009 .

[48]  B. Taranath Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2004 .

[49]  Peeranan Towashiraporn,et al.  Building Seismic Fragilities Using Response Surface Metamodels , 2004 .

[50]  Dimitri V. Val,et al.  Reliability evaluation in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete structures , 1997 .