Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: long term reproducibility of the late enhancement signal in patients with chronic coronary artery disease

Objective: To determine long term reproducibility of the late enhancement (LE) signal in contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and potential changes of the signal after revascularisation. Methods: 33 patients (29 men, mean (SD) 61 (11) years) with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction 30 (7)%) underwent two contrast enhanced MRI procedures within 9 (3) months. Fifteen patients (group A: 14 men, 59 (12) years) had no interventions between the two studies. Eighteen patients underwent revascularisation after MRI 1 (group B: 15 men, 62 (9) years). Changes in the LE signal between the first and second MRIs were investigated in both groups as well as intraobserver and interobserver variabilities for delineation of the signal. Results: The LE signal was highly reproducible in groups A and B for segmental analysis (concordance 86% v 82%, respectively; κ  =  0.70 v 0.67) and summed scores (group A: r  =  0.97, p < 0.001; group B: r  =  0.93, p < 0.001). The LE signal was quantified as 27 (27) cm3 in group A versus 30 (16) cm3 in group B in the first MRI and 26 (25) cm3 versus 30 (15) cm3, respectively, for the second MRI (both not significant). Moreover, low intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were observed in segmental analysis (κ  =  0.86 and 0.74, respectively, for group A, and κ  =  0.87 and 0.82, respectively, for group B). Conclusion: In patients with chronic CAD, the LE signal in contrast enhanced MRI is very stable over an extended time period. These results further characterise contrast enhanced MRI as a useful tool for myocardial viability assessment. Low intraobserver and interobserver variabilities promise robustness of the method for clinical application.

[1]  Matthew D. Robson,et al.  Effects of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Surgery on Reversible and Irreversible Myocardial Injury: A Randomized Trial Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Markers , 2004, Circulation.

[2]  R. Kim,et al.  Early Assessment of Myocardial Salvage by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, Circulation.

[3]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Increased mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is associated with increased levels of postoperative creatine kinase-myocardial band isoenzyme release: results from the GUARDIAN trial. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  E. Atalar,et al.  Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms. , 1995, Circulation.

[5]  R. Kim,et al.  Transmural Extent of Acute Myocardial Infarction Predicts Long-Term Improvement in Contractile Function , 2001, Circulation.

[6]  O. Simonetti,et al.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  O. Simonetti,et al.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  B. Schnackenburg,et al.  Assessment of Myocardial Viability With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography , 2002, Circulation.

[9]  S. Neubauer,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and significance of abnormal cardiac enzyme rise in patients treated with bypass surgery in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS). , 2002, Circulation.

[10]  A. Sakamoto,et al.  Minor cardiac troponin T release in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery on a beating heart. , 2000, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[11]  J Knuuti,et al.  Multimodality MR imaging assessment of myocardial viability: combination of first-pass and late contrast enhancement to wall motion dynamics and comparison with FDG PET-initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[12]  R. Jennings,et al.  The Changing Anatomic Reference Base of Evolving Myocardial Infarction: Underestimation of Myocardial Collateral Blood Flow and Overestimation of Experimental Anatomic Infarct Size Due to Tissue Edema, Hemorrhage and Acute Inflammation , 1979, Circulation.

[13]  R O Bonow,et al.  Contrast magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of myocardial viability in patients with stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. , 1998, Circulation.

[14]  Edwin Wu,et al.  Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction , 2001, The Lancet.

[15]  R. Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study , 2003, The Lancet.

[16]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. , 1999, Circulation.

[17]  J Sykes,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced MRI for the assessment of myocardial viability after permanent coronary artery occlusion , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  S. Kathiresan,et al.  A comparison of cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase-MB for patient evaluation after cardiac surgery. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  R. Kim,et al.  Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[20]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Improvement of Regional Myocardial Function in Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2002, Circulation.

[21]  E. Topol,et al.  Association between CK-MB elevation after percutaneous or surgical revascularization and three-year mortality. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  R. Kim,et al.  Reproducibility of Chronic Infarct Size Measurement by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, Circulation.

[23]  Udo Sechtem,et al.  MR imaging of myocardial perfusion and viability. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[24]  Olga Bondarenko,et al.  Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  A de Roos,et al.  Sequential analysis of infarcted and normal myocardium in piglets using in vivo gadolinium-enhanced MR images. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  R. Judd,et al.  Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. , 1995, Circulation.

[27]  H. Rutberg,et al.  Early Identification of Permanent Myocardial Damage after Coronary Surgery is Aided by Repeated Measurements of CK-MB , 2002, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.