Optimization of Capacitive Acoustic Resonant Sensor Using Numerical Simulation and Design of Experiment

Optimization of the acoustic resonant sensor requires a clear understanding of how the output responses of the sensor are affected by the variation of different factors. During this work, output responses of a capacitive acoustic transducer, such as membrane displacement, quality factor, and capacitance variation, are considered to evaluate the sensor design. The six device parameters taken into consideration are membrane radius, backplate radius, cavity height, air gap, membrane tension, and membrane thickness. The effects of factors on the output responses of the transducer are investigated using an integrated methodology that combines numerical simulation and design of experiments (DOE). A series of numerical experiments are conducted to obtain output responses for different combinations of device parameters using finite element methods (FEM). Response surface method is used to identify the significant factors and to develop the empirical models for the output responses. Finally, these results are utilized to calculate the optimum device parameters using multi-criteria optimization with desirability function. Thereafter, the validating experiments are designed and deployed using the numerical simulation to crosscheck the responses.

[1]  Airfares 2002Q,et al.  MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION , 2006, Statistical Methods for Biomedical Research.

[2]  P. Gill,et al.  Sequential Quadratic Programming Methods , 2012 .

[3]  R. Bahloul,et al.  Sheet metal bending optimisation using response surface method, numerical simulation and design of experiments , 2006 .

[4]  M. A. Sanromán,et al.  Application of central composite face-centered design and response surface methodology for the optimization of electro-Fenton decolorization of Azure B dye , 2012, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[5]  S. Durand,et al.  Analytical and numerical modeling of an axisymmetrical electrostatic transducer with interior geometrical discontinuity. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  André I. Khuri,et al.  Response surface methodology , 2010 .

[7]  Krish Ahuja,et al.  A Review of the Role of Acoustic Sensors in the Modern Battlefield , 2005 .

[8]  G. Derringer,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables , 1980 .

[9]  Gisela Hess,et al.  A subminiature condenser microphone with silicon nitride membrane and silicon back plate , 1989 .

[10]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Dynamic behavior of the circular membrane of an electrostatic microphone: effect of holes in the backing electrode. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Zhen-Zhun Shu,et al.  Design and fabrication of condenser microphone using wafer transfer and micro-electroplating technique , 2008, 2008 Symposium on Design, Test, Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS.

[12]  Wouter Olthuis,et al.  A review of silicon microphones , 1994 .

[13]  S. Glantz,et al.  Multiple Linear Regression: Accounting for Multiple Simultaneous Determinants of a Continuous Dependent Variable , 2008, Circulation.

[14]  Jacqueline K. Telford,et al.  A Brief Introduction to Design of Experiments , 2007 .

[15]  Miko Elwenspoek,et al.  Q-factor and Frequency Shift of Resonating Silicon Diaphragms in Air , 1990 .

[16]  Xiaodong Sun,et al.  A Micromachined Pressure Sensor with Integrated Resonator Operating at Atmospheric Pressure , 2013, Sensors.

[17]  O. Oralkan,et al.  Optimum design of circular CMUT membranes for high quality factor in air , 2008, 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[18]  Zhijian Li,et al.  Design and fabrication of silicon condenser microphone using corrugated diaphragm technique , 1996 .

[19]  S. Durand,et al.  Miniaturized electrostatic receiver with small-sized backing electrode , 2013 .

[20]  A. Bower Applied Mechanics of Solids , 2009 .

[21]  H. S. Wolff,et al.  iRun: Horizontal and Vertical Shape of a Region-Based Graph Compression , 2022, Sensors.

[22]  Ben Wang,et al.  Resin transfer molding process optimization using numerical simulation and design of experiments approach , 2003 .

[23]  Dimitrios Chatzopoulos Modeling the performance of MEMS based directional microphones , 2008 .

[24]  Roger Phan-Tan-Luu,et al.  Pharmaceutical Experimental Design , 1998 .

[25]  W. K. Miller,et al.  Response-surface co-optimization of reaction conditions in clinical chemical methods. , 1979, Clinical chemistry.

[26]  Kensall D. Wise,et al.  A high sensitivity polysilicon diaphragm condenser microphone , 1998, Proceedings MEMS 98. IEEE. Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Systems (Cat. No.98CH36176.