Impedance Measures During in vitro Cochlear Implantation Predict Array Positioning

Objective: Improper electrode placement during cochlear implant (CI) insertion can adversely affect speech perception outcomes. However, the intraoperative methods to determine positioning are limited. Because measures of electrode impedance can be made quickly, the goal of this study was to assess the relationship between CI impedance and proximity to adjacent structures. Methods: An Advanced Bionics CI array was inserted into a clear, plastic cochlea one electrode contact at a time in a saline bath (nine trials). At each insertion depth, response to biphasic current pulses was used to calculate access resistance (Ra), polarization resistance (Rp), and polarization capacitance (Cp). These measures were correlated to actual proximity as assessed by microscopy using linear regression models. Results: Impedance increased with insertion depth and proximity to the inner wall. Specifically, Ra increased, Cp decreased, and Rp slightly increased. Incorporating all impedance measures afforded a prediction model (r = 0.88) while optimizing for sub-mm positioning afforded a model with 78.3% specificity. Conclusion: Impedance in vitro greatly changes with electrode insertion depth and proximity to adjacent structures in a predicable manner. Significance : Assessing proximity of the CI to adjacent structures is a significant first step in qualifying the electrode-neural interface. This information should aid in CI fitting, which should help maximize hearing and speech outcomes with a CI. Additionally, knowledge of the relationship between impedance and positioning could have utility in other tissue implants in the brain, retina, or spinal cord.

[1]  Filiep Vanpoucke,et al.  Assessing the Placement of a Cochlear Electrode Array by Multidimensional Scaling , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of an Image-Guided Cochlear Implant Programming Strategy , 2014, Audiology and Neurotology.

[3]  Sudip Nag,et al.  Sensing of Stimulus Artifact Suppressed Signals From Electrode Interfaces , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[4]  A. Beynon,et al.  Pre-, Per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time , 2012, PloS one.

[5]  Jake J. Abbott,et al.  A Scalable Model for Human Scala-Tympani Phantoms , 2011 .

[6]  Guang Cheng,et al.  Correlation Between Structure and Resistivity Variations of the Live Human Skull , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Lucas H M Mens,et al.  Trends in Amplification , 2022 .

[8]  Claudiu Treaba,et al.  Real‐time measurement of electrode impedance during intracochlear electrode insertion , 2013, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  George B. Wanna,et al.  The importance of electrode location in cochlear implantation , 2016, Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology.

[10]  Marco Mandalà,et al.  Electrocochleography during Cochlear Implantation for Hearing Preservation , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  Filiep Vanpoucke,et al.  Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  P A Busby,et al.  Electrode impedance in adults and children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system , 2002, Cochlear implants international.

[13]  E Lehnhardt,et al.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique]. , 1993, HNO.

[14]  Kristen Rak,et al.  Intraoperative Monitoring Using Cochlear Microphonics in Cochlear Implant Patients With Residual Hearing , 2012, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[15]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system , 2008, Hearing Research.

[16]  C. Buchman,et al.  Round window electrocochleography before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion , 2016, The Laryngoscope.

[17]  Nabil Simaan,et al.  Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements , 2017, The Laryngoscope.

[18]  Johan Frijns,et al.  The Facial Nerve Canal: An Important Cochlear Conduction Path Revealed by Clarion Electrical Field Imaging , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  Jarosław Wysocki,et al.  Dimensions of the human vestibular and tympanic scalae , 1999, Hearing Research.

[20]  Julie Arenberg Bierer,et al.  Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds , 2016, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[21]  Ye Chen,et al.  A semi‐supervised Support Vector Machine model for predicting the language outcomes following cochlear implantation based on pre‐implant brain fMRI imaging , 2015, Brain and behavior.

[22]  C. Buchman,et al.  Round Window Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Subjects: Comparison With Audiometric and Biographical Information , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[23]  Hillel J. Chiel,et al.  Real-Time Stimulus Artifact Rejection Via Template Subtraction , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[24]  Mary S. Dietrich,et al.  Force Perception Thresholds in Cochlear Implantation Surgery , 2016, Audiology and Neurotology.

[25]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Electrode Location and Angular Insertion Depth Are Predictors of Audiologic Outcomes in Cochlear Implantation , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[26]  Michelle L. Hughes,et al.  Objective Measures in Cochlear Implants , 2012 .

[27]  C. Buchman,et al.  Round Window Electrocochleography Just Before Cochlear Implantation: Relationship to Word Recognition Outcomes in Adults , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[28]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.

[29]  G M Clark,et al.  Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[30]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[31]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Threshold, Comfortable Level and Impedance Changes as a Function of Electrode-Modiolar Distance , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[32]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Measurement and Analysis of Access Resistance and Polarization Impedance in Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[33]  A. Ernst,et al.  Intraoperative Electrophysiologic Variations Caused by the Scalar Position of Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[34]  Karen M Mispagel,et al.  Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[35]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. Noble,et al.  Relationship Between Electrode-to-Modiolus Distance and Current Levels for Adults With Cochlear Implants , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.