Non-linear spatial Timoshenko beam element with curvature interpolation

The paper presents a spatial Timoshenko beam element with a total Lagrangian formulation. The element is based on curvature interpolation that is independent of the rigid-body motion of the beam element and simplifies the formulation. The section response is derived from plane section kinematics. A two-node beam element with constant curvature is relatively simple to formulate and exhibits excellent numerical convergence. The formulation is extended to N-node elements with polynomial curvature interpolation. Models with moderate discretization yield results of sufficient accuracy with a small number of iterations at each load step. Generalized second-order stress resultants are identified and the section response takes into account non-linear material behaviour. Green–Lagrange strains are expressed in terms of section curvature and shear distortion, whose first and second variations are functions of node displacements and rotations. A symmetric tangent stiffness matrix is derived by consistent linearization and an iterative acceleration method is used to improve numerical convergence for hyperelastic materials. The comparison of analytical results with numerical simulations in the literature demonstrates the consistency, accuracy and superior numerical performance of the proposed element. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Crisfield A consistent co-rotational formulation for non-linear, three-dimensional, beam-elements , 1990 .

[2]  Stuart S. Antman,et al.  Kirchhoff’s problem for nonlinearly elastic rods , 1974 .

[3]  Carlos A. Felippa,et al.  A three‐dimensional non‐linear Timoshenko beam based on the core‐congruential formulation , 1993 .

[4]  K. Bathe,et al.  Large displacement analysis of three‐dimensional beam structures , 1979 .

[5]  E. Dvorkin,et al.  On a non‐linear formulation for curved Timoshenko beam elements considering large displacement/rotation increments , 1988 .

[6]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I , 1985 .

[7]  M. Géradin,et al.  A beam finite element non‐linear theory with finite rotations , 1988 .

[8]  H BarrAlan,et al.  Smooth interpolation of orientations with angular velocity constraints using quaternions , 1992 .

[9]  Leonard R. Herrmann,et al.  Elastic Torsional Analysis of Irregular Shapes , 1965 .

[10]  J. P. Ward Quaternions and Cayley Numbers , 1997 .

[11]  W. E. Schmitendorf,et al.  Analytical dynamics of discrete systems , 1977 .

[12]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects , 1986 .

[13]  ShoemakeKen Animating rotation with quaternion curves , 1985 .

[14]  Ken Shoemake,et al.  Animating rotation with quaternion curves , 1985, SIGGRAPH.

[15]  K. Spring Euler parameters and the use of quaternion algebra in the manipulation of finite rotations: A review , 1986 .

[16]  F. Filippou,et al.  Generalized Warping Torsion Formulation , 1998 .

[17]  John F. Hughes,et al.  Smooth interpolation of orientations with angular velocity constraints using quaternions , 1992, SIGGRAPH.

[18]  Ziad M. Elias Theory and methods of structural analysis , 1986 .

[19]  M. Gurtin,et al.  An introduction to continuum mechanics , 1981 .

[20]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures , 1991 .

[21]  Kjell Mattiasson,et al.  Numerical results from large deflection beam and frame problems analysed by means of elliptic integrals , 1981 .

[22]  K. Washizu Variational Methods in Elasticity and Plasticity , 1982 .

[24]  R. A. Spurrier Comment on " Singularity-Free Extraction of a Quaternion from a Direction-Cosine Matrix" , 1978 .

[25]  J. Argyris An excursion into large rotations , 1982 .

[26]  R. H. Mallett,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Nonlinear Structures , 1968 .

[27]  E. Reissner On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: The plane problem , 1972 .

[28]  S. Timoshenko History of strength of materials , 1953 .