Variability of grip strength during isometric contraction.

The use of measures of strength variability as a means of determining sincerity of effort is becoming a more common practice, particularly in medico-legal and rehabilitation settings. The stability of such variability measures, however, has not been documented. This research investigated, in two studies, the trial-to-trial variability of grip strength under maximal and submaximal effort conditions. In the first study, 63 subjects were asked to give 100% grip effort, and in the second study 40 subjects from the original group were asked to give 50% grip effort. The Jamar hand dynamometer was used to measure grip strength in both experiments, and a coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for every three repeat measures at each handle position. Testing was conducted on two separate occasions for both experiments. Although the interoccasion reliability of grip strength was very high, in comparison, the CV was not stable over test occasions, with interoccasion reliability indices close to zero. Factors significantly influencing CV were effort level, with submaximal effort producing larger CVs, and gender, with females having greater strength variability. If the rule is applied that one or more CVs above the 7.5% cut-off value could indicate submaximal effort, then for this sample of subjects giving maximal effort, 97% of females and 64% of males would be misclassified. Applying a single CV classification cut-off value to a mixed sample of subjects appears to unfairly discriminate against the females. Further research into the factors associated with high CV values is essential before the CV can be used with any confidence in a clinical setting as a method for determining sincerity of effort.

[1]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Differentiation of maximal and submaximal knee extension efforts by isokinetic testing. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  B. Fleming,et al.  Test-retest variation in lifting capacity and indices of subject effort. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  An evaluation of rapid exchange and simultaneous grip tests. , 1993, The Journal of hand surgery.

[5]  A Garg,et al.  A comparison of isometric strength and dynamic lifting capability. , 1980, Ergonomics.

[6]  J. Pytel,et al.  Dynamic strength test as a predictor for maximal and acceptable lifting , 1981 .

[7]  W S Marras,et al.  Evaluation of Maximal and Submaximal Static Muscle Exertions , 1981, Human factors.

[8]  C. Bechtol,et al.  Grip test; the use of a dynamometer with adjustable handle spacings. , 1954, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[10]  A Garg,et al.  A method for evaluating the biomechanical stresses resulting from manual materials handling jobs. , 1977, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[11]  R. Adams,et al.  Grip strength testing reliability. , 1994, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[12]  Koichiro Fujimoto,et al.  Validation of a protocol for determining submaximal efforts in back strength assessment , 1992 .

[13]  S Carlsöö,et al.  With what degree of precision can voluntary static muscle force be repeated? , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  P. B. Trossman,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability and Day-to-Day Variability of an Isometric Grip Strength Test Using the Work Simulator , 1990 .

[15]  R W Bohannon,et al.  DIFFERENTIATION OF MAXIMAL FROM SUBMAXIMAL STATIC ELBOW FLEXOR EFFORTS BY MEASUREMENT VARIABILITY , 1987, American journal of physical medicine.

[16]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.