Methods for knowledge synthesis: an overview.

[1]  Sharon Kaasalainen,et al.  Caregivers’ contributions to heart failure self-care: A systematic review , 2015, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  Kelly D. Stamp,et al.  Transitional Care Programs Improve Outcomes for Heart Failure Patients: An Integrative Review , 2014, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[3]  Paul A Estabrooks,et al.  Assessing the Internal and External Validity of Mobile Health Physical Activity Promotion Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review Using the RE-AIM Framework , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  S. Oliver,et al.  Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[5]  E. Friedmann,et al.  Effects of interventions on depression in heart failure: a systematic review. , 2012, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[6]  A. Tricco,et al.  What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[7]  D. Gough,et al.  Clarifying differences between review designs and methods , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[8]  David Moher,et al.  Establishing a new journal for systematic review products , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[9]  Gagandeep Kang,et al.  Analysis of human immune responses in quasi-experimental settings: tutorial in biostatistics , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[10]  G. Eysenbach.  CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  C. Pope,et al.  Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. , 2011, Health technology assessment.

[12]  N. Mutrie,et al.  The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2011, Health technology assessment.

[13]  P. Estabrooks,et al.  Understanding the Internal and External Validity of Health Literacy Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review Using the RE-AIM Framework , 2011, Journal of health communication.

[14]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Using qualitative synthesis to explore heterogeneity of complex interventions , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[15]  L. Monasta,et al.  Early-life determinants of overweight and obesity: a review of systematic reviews , 2011 .

[16]  Karen Ritchie,et al.  A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews , 2011 .

[17]  F. McAlister,et al.  Meta-analysis: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Patients With Less Symptomatic Heart Failure , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  Rebecca Armstrong,et al.  Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[19]  M. Clarke,et al.  Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[20]  Elena Losina,et al.  Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: A simulation study , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[21]  M. Crowther,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. , 2010, Blood.

[22]  D. Levac,et al.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[23]  Karin Hannes,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Three Online Appraisal Instruments’ Ability to Assess Validity in Qualitative Research , 2010, Qualitative health research.

[24]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[25]  Denise Thomson,et al.  The evolution of a new publication type: Steps and challenges of producing overviews of reviews , 2010, Research synthesis methods.

[26]  E. Tacconelli.  Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[27]  J. Brug,et al.  Early‐life determinants of overweight and obesity: a review of systematic reviews , 2010, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[28]  John P.A. Ioannidis,et al.  Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[29]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, PloS one.

[30]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  P. Pluye,et al.  A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[32]  Jennie Popay,et al.  Qualitative Research and Cochrane Reviews , 2008 .

[33]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[34]  David R Thompson,et al.  Living with chronic heart failure: a review of qualitative studies of older people. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[35]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Recent developments in meta‐analysis , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[36]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[37]  E. Elm,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, The Lancet.

[38]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports , 2007 .

[40]  R. Haynes,et al.  Search Strategies for Identifying Qualitative Studies in CINAHL , 2007, Qualitative health research.

[41]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[42]  O. Gureje,et al.  Making sense of evidence , 2007, International review of psychiatry.

[43]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Retrieving Qualitative Studies in PsycINFO , 2006, Evaluation & the health professions.

[44]  Margarete Sandelowski,et al.  Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research , 2006 .

[45]  Leslie A. Walters,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Retrieving Clinically Relevant Qualitative Studies in EMBASE , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[46]  R. Whittemore,et al.  The integrative review: updated methodology. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[47]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[48]  A. Harden,et al.  Methodological Issues in Combining Diverse Study Types in Systematic Reviews , 2005 .

[49]  A. Liberati,et al.  Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[50]  S. Downe,et al.  Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[51]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[52]  R. Whittemore,et al.  Combining Evidence in Nursing Research: Methods and Implications , 2005, Nursing research.

[53]  M. Jones.  Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. , 2004, Journal of advanced nursing.

[54]  V. Bykerk,et al.  Consensus Statement , 2004, Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines & Policies.

[55]  D. Altman,et al.  CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[56]  Don C Des Jarlais,et al.  Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[57]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[58]  D. Finfgeld,et al.  Metasynthesis: The State of the Art—So Far , 2003, Qualitative health research.

[59]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[60]  G. Antes,et al.  Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review , 2003, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[61]  Lisa M Klesges,et al.  Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[62]  Christian Gluud,et al.  Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[63]  J. Sterne,et al.  Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[64]  D. Altman,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care : meta-analysis in context , 2001 .

[65]  R. Glasgow,et al.  The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? , 2001, Patient education and counseling.

[66]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. , 2001, BMJ.

[67]  R. Whittemore,et al.  Validity in Qualitative Research , 2001, Qualitative health research.

[68]  Sally Thorne,et al.  Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis , 2001 .

[69]  Rosaline S Barbour,et al.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[70]  P. Lee,et al.  Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[71]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[72]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[73]  J. Popay,et al.  Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research , 1998, Qualitative health research.

[74]  M. Kearney.  Ready-to-wear: discovering grounded formal theory. , 1998, Research in nursing & health.

[75]  G. Smith,et al.  Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise , 1997, BMJ.

[76]  M. Kirkevold.  Integrative nursing research--an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.

[77]  D. Cook,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[78]  A R Jadad,et al.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[79]  M. Sandelowski.  Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. , 1993, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[80]  E Stullenbarger,et al.  A prototype for integrative review and meta-analysis of nursing research. , 1991, Journal of advanced nursing.

[81]  T C Chalmers,et al.  A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. , 1981, Controlled clinical trials.

[82]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[83]  Andy Tattersall,et al.  Resources and Tools , 2015 .

[84]  J. Tetzlaff,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2014 .

[85]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential , 2013 .

[86]  黄亚明（整理）,et al.  Equator network , 2012 .

[87]  W. Kamps,et al.  BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2009 .

[88]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[89]  K. Finlayson,et al.  Qualitative meta-synthesis: a guide for the novice. , 2008, Nurse researcher.

[90]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  ' s response to reviews Title : Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials : meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no-treatment , placebo and active intervention , 2008 .

[91]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies. , 2006, Research in the schools : a nationally refereed journal sponsored by the Mid-South Educational Research Association and the University of Alabama.

[92]  Catherine Pope,et al.  Moving Beyond Effectiveness in evidence Synthesis: methodological issues in the synthesis of diverse sources of evidence , 2006 .

[93]  N. Wilczynski,et al.  Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Relevant Qualitative Studies in MEDLINE , 2004, MedInfo.

[94]  Jennie Popay,et al.  Synthesising research evidence. , 2001 .

[95]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods , 2001 .

[96]  B. Paterson,et al.  Meta-study of qualitative health research : a practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis , 2001 .

[97]  W Foege,et al.  Guide to Community Preventive Services: harnessing the science. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[98]  N. Mays,et al.  Assessing quality in qualitative research , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[99]  G. Noblit,et al.  Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies , 1988 .

[100]  K. Shashok,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Content and Communication: How Can Peer Review Provide Helpful Feedback about the Writing? , 2022 .