A scalable approach to determine cervical cancer screening needs among emergency department patients in the United States

[1]  Yenan Zhu,et al.  Assessment of US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline–Concordant Cervical Cancer Screening Rates and Reasons for Underscreening by Age, Race and Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, Rurality, and Insurance, 2005 to 2019 , 2022, JAMA network open.

[2]  M. Phipps,et al.  Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[3]  A. Stone,et al.  PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  C. Klabunde,et al.  Cancer Screening Test Use — United States, 2013 , 2015, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[5]  C. Klabunde,et al.  Challenges in Meeting Healthy People 2020 Objectives for Cancer-Related Preventive Services, National Health Interview Survey, 2008 and 2010 , 2014, Preventing chronic disease.

[6]  Daniel J Buysse,et al.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  J. Fries,et al.  Items, Instruments, Crosswalks, and PROMIS , 2009, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[8]  E. Franco,et al.  Process of care failures in invasive cervical cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[9]  J. Fries,et al.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group During its First Two Years , 2007, Medical care.

[10]  J F Fries,et al.  The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. , 2005, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.