High-resolution Bayesian mapping of landslide hazard with unobserved trigger event

Statistical models for landslide hazard enable mapping of risk factors and landslide occurrence intensity by using geomorphological covariates available at high spatial resolution. However, the spatial distribution of the triggering event (e.g., precipitation or earthquakes) is often not directly observed. In this paper, we develop Bayesian spatial hierarchical models for point patterns of landslide occurrences using different types of log-Gaussian Cox processes. Starting from a competitive baseline model that captures the unobserved precipitation trigger through a spatial random effect at slope unit resolution, we explore novel complex model structures that take clusters of events arising at small spatial scales into account, as well as nonlinear or spatially-varying covariate effects. For a 2009 event of around 4000 precipitation-triggered landslides in Sicily, Italy, we show how to fit our proposed models efficiently using the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), and rigorously compare the performance of our models both from a statistical and applied perspective. In this context, we argue that model comparison should not be based on a single criterion, and that different models of various complexity may provide insights into complementary aspects of the same applied problem. In our application, our models are found to have mostly the same spatial predictive performance, implying that key to successful prediction is the inclusion of a slope-unit resolved random effect capturing the precipitation trigger. Interestingly, a parsimonious formulation of space-varying slope effects reflects a physical interpretation of the precipitation trigger: in subareas with weak trigger, the slope steepness is shown to be mostly irrelevant.

[1]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Towards a definition of topographic divisions for Italy , 1994 .

[2]  L. Ayalew,et al.  The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan , 2005 .

[3]  H. Rue,et al.  Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations , 2009 .

[4]  E. Rotigliano,et al.  Exploiting Maximum Entropy method and ASTER data for assessing debris flow and debris slide susceptibility for the Giampilieri catchment (north‐eastern Sicily, Italy) , 2016 .

[5]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[6]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[7]  Finn Lindgren,et al.  Advanced Spatial Modeling with Stochastic Partial Differential Equations Using R and INLA , 2018 .

[8]  J. Besag Statistical Analysis of Non-Lattice Data , 1975 .

[9]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models , 2013, Statistics and Computing.

[10]  G. Fubelli,et al.  Presence-only approach to assess landslide triggering-thickness susceptibility: a test for the Mili catchment (north-eastern Sicily, Italy) , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[11]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Generalised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the Central Apennines, Italy , 1998 .

[12]  S. Leroueil,et al.  The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update , 2014, Landslides.

[13]  Leonhard Held,et al.  Gaussian Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications , 2005 .

[14]  Antonio Francipane,et al.  Effect of raster resolution and polygon-conversion algorithm on landslide susceptibility mapping , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Haavard Rue,et al.  Bayesian Computing with INLA: A Review , 2016, 1604.00860.

[16]  C. Thorne,et al.  Quantitative analysis of land surface topography , 1987 .

[17]  L. Lombardo,et al.  Accounting for covariate distributions in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models. A case study in the alpine environment , 2019, Engineering Geology.

[18]  Haavard Rue,et al.  A toolbox for fitting complex spatial point process models using integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) , 2012, 1301.1817.

[19]  P. Martin Mai,et al.  Geostatistical Modeling to Capture Seismic‐Shaking Patterns From Earthquake‐Induced Landslides , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface.

[20]  H. Rue,et al.  Scaling intrinsic Gaussian Markov random field priors in spatial modelling , 2014 .

[21]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Gis Technology in Mapping Landslide Hazard , 1995 .

[22]  Raphael Huser,et al.  Point process-based modeling of multiple debris flow landslides using INLA: an application to the 2009 Messina disaster , 2017, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[23]  Thomas J. Leininger,et al.  Bayesian Inference and Model Assessment for Spatial Point Patterns Using Posterior Predictive Samples , 2017 .

[24]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[25]  L. Tierney,et al.  Accurate Approximations for Posterior Moments and Marginal Densities , 1986 .

[26]  Raphaël Huser,et al.  Numerical Recipes for Landslide Spatial Prediction Using R-INLA , 2019 .

[27]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[28]  Dani Gamerman,et al.  Space-varying regression models: specifications and simulation , 2001, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[29]  J. Møller,et al.  Log Gaussian Cox Processes , 1998 .

[30]  E. Rotigliano,et al.  Predicting storm-triggered debris flow events: application to the 2009 Ionian Peloritan disaster (Sicily, Italy) , 2015 .

[31]  Ivan Marchesini,et al.  Automatic delineation of geomorphological slope units with r.slopeunits v1.0 and their optimization for landslide susceptibility modeling , 2016 .

[32]  R. Heerdegen,et al.  Quantifying source areas through land surface curvature and shape , 1982 .

[33]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models , 2018 .

[34]  E. Rotigliano,et al.  Exploring relationships between grid cell size and accuracy for debris-flow susceptibility models: a test in the Giampilieri catchment (Sicily, Italy) , 2016, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[35]  H. Rue,et al.  INLA goes extreme: Bayesian tail regression for the estimation of high spatio-temporal quantiles , 2018, Extremes.

[36]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Digital terrain analysis. , 2008 .

[37]  John P. Wilson,et al.  Terrain analysis : principles and applications , 2000 .

[38]  Thomas Opitz,et al.  Latent Gaussian modeling and INLA: A review with focus on space-time applications , 2017, 1708.02723.

[39]  Thiago G. Martins,et al.  Penalising Model Component Complexity: A Principled, Practical Approach to Constructing Priors , 2014, 1403.4630.

[40]  C. F. Sirmans,et al.  Spatial Modeling With Spatially Varying Coefficient Processes , 2003 .

[41]  E. Rotigliano,et al.  A test of transferability for landslides susceptibility models under extreme climatic events: application to the Messina 2009 disaster , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[42]  Alexander Brenning,et al.  Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[43]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts , 2010 .

[44]  Jie Dou,et al.  Handling high predictor dimensionality in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models through LASSO-penalized Generalized Linear Model , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  Paula Moraga,et al.  Geospatial Health Data: Modeling and Visualization with R-Inla and Shiny , 2019 .

[46]  F. Guzzetti,et al.  Space-time landslide predictive modelling , 2019, Earth-Science Reviews.