Anthropometrical, physical fitness and maturational characteristics in youth soccer : methodological issues and a longitudinal approach to talent identification and development

From the literature, it has been massively recommended that talent identification, development and selection processes in youth soccer should provide a longitudinal, holistic approach accounting for maturation and relative age. The sport of soccer systematically excludes those players who are later to mature and/or who are later born in the in the selection year, whilst these players might be as gifted as their earlier maturing and/or earlier born peers. There are often no or insufficient objective criteria that could support the evaluation process. The present thesis aimed to gain insight in young soccer players’ development of anthropometrical characteristics, physical fitness and motor coordination parameters with respect to maturation and relative age. Therefore, the conducted research was divided into four different chapters. The first chapter investigated (1) test-retest reliability and validity of the intermittent endurance performance, assessed by the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery test level 1 (YYIR1) in elite, suband non-elite players (study 1, n=228, 10-17 y; study 2, n=36, 13-18 y ), (2) the short- and long-term stability of anthropometrical characteristics and YYIR1 of 42 pubertal soccer players (study 3), and (3) the relationship between invasive (skeletal age) and non-invasive (estimation of age at peak height velocity) protocols to estimate adult stature on the one hand, and the agreement between methods assigning players to somatic maturity categories on the other in a mixed-sample of 160 Belgian and Brazilian elite players (study 4). Combining the results of the first two studies, the YYIR1 seems more reliable at elite level and at older ages (U17-U19) compared with sub-/non-elite level and at younger ages (U13-U15). Also, players with a relatively low YYIR1 performance at the age of 12 years are able to (however partially) catch-up the better performers over a four-year period, suggesting the need for individualization within the training process (study 3). Furthermore, the fourth study demonstrated that invasive and non-invasive protocols correspond well in estimating mature stature, although transforming estimated APHV into somatic maturity categories has proven to be problematic in elite youth soccer players. The second chapter focused on the influence of relative age on both aerobic (YYIR1) (study 5, n=606, U10-U19) and anaerobic performance measures (speed and explosive leg power) (study 6, n=374, U13-U17). A clear overrepresentation of players born in the first part of the selection year was found in both studies, although relative age did not confound aerobic as well as anaerobic performance measures. This might be explained by the fact that (1) the formation of homogenous players in terms of aerobic and anaerobic performances was already manifest before the age of 10 years, and (2) this reflects the variation in maturity status among players within the same age-cohort. The third chapter investigated the longitudinal development of the YYIR1 performance (study 7, n=162, 11-14 y) and explosive leg power (study 8, n=356, 11-14 y; study 9, n=555, 7-20 y) via multilevel analyses. Also, retrospective data were used to predict drop out, contract status and first-team playing time using anthropometrical, maturational, physical fitness and motor coordination characteristics (study 10, n=388, 8-16 y). Generally, the results highlighted that non-specific motor coordination contributed significantly to the development of aerobic and anaerobic performances, and that this parameter could distinguish between future successful and less successful young soccer players. Further, young soccer players possessing higher levels of explosive leg power from the age of 16 years are more likely to sign a professional contract and are receiving more playing minutes at the professional adult level. The final chapter described differences in 744 youth soccer players’ (9 to 18 y) anthropometrical characteristics and general fitness level through aerobic and anaerobic tests according to the playing position on the field (study 11). The results revealed that inherent anthropometrical and physical capacities (i.e., speed, power, agility) might select players in or reject players from certain positions, and the time around peak height velocity seems to be crucial in this selection process. However, the typical characteristics for the different playing positions at senior level are yet not fully developed among young soccer players between 8 and 14 years, although the typical anthropometrical characteristics of goalkeepers (i.e., taller and heavier) were already manifest at young age. In conclusion, the abovementioned studies in this thesis (1) emphasize the use of the YYIR1 as a valid, reliable and maturity-independent tool to assess a players’ intermittent endurance capacity, (2) highlight that the selection process is focused on the formation of homogenous groups of players in terms of anthropometrical, maturational and physical fitness parameters, independent of playing position, and (3) that non-specific motor coordination is essential in the development of physical fitness measures and should be included in the training process.

[1]  J. Lefevre,et al.  Biological maturation, morphology, fitness, and motor coordination as part of a selection strategy in the search for international youth soccer players (age 15–16 years) , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  N. Hirose Relationships among birth-month distribution, skeletal age and anthropometric characteristics in adolescent elite soccer players , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Isokinetic strength and anaerobic power of elite, subelite and amateur French soccer players. , 2001, International journal of sports medicine.

[4]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science , 2000, Sports medicine.

[5]  R. Malina,et al.  Modelling Developmental Changes in Repeated-Sprint Ability by Chronological and Skeletal Ages in Young Soccer Players , 2012, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[6]  A. Coutts,et al.  Relative Age, Biological Maturation and Anaerobic Characteristics in Elite Youth Soccer Players , 2013, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[7]  R. Malina,et al.  Longitudinal predictors of aerobic performance in adolescent soccer players. , 2012, Medicina.

[8]  J. Baker,et al.  Annual Age-Grouping and Athlete Development , 2009, Sports medicine.

[9]  Sean P. Cumming,et al.  Maturity-associated variation in the growth and functional capacities of youth football (soccer) players 13–15 years , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[10]  R. Malina,et al.  A multidisciplinary selection model for youth soccer: the Ghent Youth Soccer Project , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[11]  Beth Hands,et al.  Changes in motor skill and fitness measures among children with high and low motor competence: a five-year longitudinal study. , 2008, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[12]  C. Carling,et al.  Do anthropometric and fitness characteristics vary according to birth date distribution in elite youth academy soccer players? , 2008, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[13]  K. Chardon,et al.  Relationship between vertical jumping performance and anthropometric characteristics during growth in boys and girls , 2009, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[14]  M. Lenoir,et al.  Talent Identification and Development Programmes in Sport , 2008, Sports medicine.

[15]  V. Segers,et al.  Running economy in early and late maturing youth soccer players does not differ , 2008, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[16]  Lauren B Sherar,et al.  Do physical maturity and birth date predict talent in male youth ice hockey players? , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  C. Castagna,et al.  Physiology of Soccer , 2005, Sports medicine.

[18]  A Mark Williams,et al.  The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.

[19]  G. Beunen,et al.  An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  É. Doré,et al.  Short-Term Muscle Power During Growth and Maturation , 2002, Sports medicine.

[21]  R. Malina,et al.  Characteristics of youth soccer players aged 13–15 years classified by skill level , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[22]  G Atkinson,et al.  Update – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research , 2011, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[23]  I. Mujika,et al.  The relative age effect in a professional football club setting , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[24]  R. Malina,et al.  Modeling developmental changes in functional capacities and soccer-specific skills in male players aged 11-17 years. , 2012, Pediatric exercise science.

[25]  Karim Chamari,et al.  Relationship Between Anthropometric and Physiological Characteristics in Youth Soccer Players , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[26]  T. Rowland Is explosive performance influenced by androgen concentrations in young male soccer players , 2010 .

[27]  A F Roche,et al.  Predicting adult stature without using skeletal age: the Khamis-Roche method. , 1994, Pediatrics.

[28]  W. Helsen,et al.  The roles of talent, physical precocity and practice in the development of soccer expertise , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[29]  A. Coutts,et al.  Relative Age Effect and Yo-Yo IR1 in Youth Soccer , 2012, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[30]  C. Bosco,et al.  The effect of extra-load conditioning on muscle performance in athletes. , 1986, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[31]  P. Aerts,et al.  Performing the vertical jump: movement adaptations for submaximal jumping. , 2004, Human movement science.

[32]  R. Malina,et al.  Height, mass and skeletal maturity of elite Portuguese soccer players aged 11–16 years , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[33]  Jochen Musch,et al.  Unequal Competition as an Impediment to Personal Development: A Review of the Relative Age Effect in Sport☆ , 2001 .

[34]  J. Lefevre,et al.  The KörperkoordinationsTest für Kinder: reference values and suitability for 6–12‐year‐old children in Flanders , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[35]  J. Tanner,et al.  Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty. , 1976, Archives of disease in childhood.

[36]  Roel Vaeyens,et al.  The relative age effect in soccer: A match-related perspective , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.

[37]  S. Marshall,et al.  Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[38]  P. Krustrup,et al.  Match performance of high-standard soccer players with special reference to development of fatigue , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[39]  Robert M Malina,et al.  Youth soccer players, 11–14 years: Maturity, size, function, skill and goal orientation , 2009, Annals of human biology.

[40]  A. Thompson,et al.  Birthdate and success in minor hockey: The key to the NHL , 1988 .